A Steep Mountain to Cross: Adequacy Assessment Process Through the Eyes of Students of PhD

Ayşe Gülen Ertümer, Ramazan Erdem, Dilruba İzgüden, Sümeyye Güngör, Rabia Fettahoğlu, Zeynep Kuh, Elif Özer, Begüm Ceylan, Hilal Demirhan, Fatma Üzümcü, Ebru Yildiz
{"title":"A Steep Mountain to Cross: Adequacy Assessment Process Through the Eyes of Students of PhD","authors":"Ayşe Gülen Ertümer, Ramazan Erdem, Dilruba İzgüden, Sümeyye Güngör, Rabia Fettahoğlu, Zeynep Kuh, Elif Özer, Begüm Ceylan, Hilal Demirhan, Fatma Üzümcü, Ebru Yildiz","doi":"10.14689/enad.32.749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Türkiye, postgraduate students are required to take the \"Ph.D. proficiency exam\" to pass the thesis stage and complete their education after completing their doctoral course period. The \"proficiency process,\" which manifests itself as a long, difficult and stressful process, seems like a \"steep mountain to cross\" in the lives of doctoral students. This research examines the Ph.D. proficiency process from doctoral students' perspectives and determines the results. The interpretative phenomenological design, one of the qualitative research methods, was used; with the criterion sampling method, which is one of the purposive sampling methods, interviews were conducted with 9 participants and 55 pages of data were obtained, and the data were analyzed with thematic analysis. When the proficiency exam is evaluated as a whole, it has been determined that it has some positive and negative results. At the end of this whole process, the proficiency exam has gained meaning as a \"compelling process,\" \"learning and development process,\" \"great exam,\" \"understanding of inadequacy,\" and \"an indescribable process.\" The information obtained from the research is a guide for students who will take the exam in the future. In addition, based on the research results, suggestions for students and suggestions for the exam are presented.","PeriodicalId":41153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Qualitative Research in Education-Egitimde Nitel Arastirmalar Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Qualitative Research in Education-Egitimde Nitel Arastirmalar Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.32.749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Türkiye, postgraduate students are required to take the "Ph.D. proficiency exam" to pass the thesis stage and complete their education after completing their doctoral course period. The "proficiency process," which manifests itself as a long, difficult and stressful process, seems like a "steep mountain to cross" in the lives of doctoral students. This research examines the Ph.D. proficiency process from doctoral students' perspectives and determines the results. The interpretative phenomenological design, one of the qualitative research methods, was used; with the criterion sampling method, which is one of the purposive sampling methods, interviews were conducted with 9 participants and 55 pages of data were obtained, and the data were analyzed with thematic analysis. When the proficiency exam is evaluated as a whole, it has been determined that it has some positive and negative results. At the end of this whole process, the proficiency exam has gained meaning as a "compelling process," "learning and development process," "great exam," "understanding of inadequacy," and "an indescribable process." The information obtained from the research is a guide for students who will take the exam in the future. In addition, based on the research results, suggestions for students and suggestions for the exam are presented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
要跨过一座陡峭的山:博士生眼中的充分性评估过程
rkiye,研究生需要参加“博士水平考试”,通过论文阶段,并在完成博士课程后完成教育。在博士生的生活中,“熟练过程”是一个漫长、困难和有压力的过程,似乎是一座“难以跨越的高山”。本研究从博士生的角度考察博士熟练度过程,并确定结果。采用定性研究方法之一的解释性现象学设计;采用目的性抽样方法之一的标准抽样方法,对9名参与者进行访谈,获得55页数据,并对数据进行专题分析。当能力考试作为一个整体进行评估时,已经确定它有一些积极和消极的结果。在这整个过程的最后,熟练程度考试获得了“令人信服的过程”、“学习和发展过程”、“伟大的考试”、“了解不足”和“难以形容的过程”的意义。从研究中获得的信息是对将来参加考试的学生的指导。此外,根据研究结果提出了对学生的建议和对考试的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Teacher's Classroom Practices in the Context of Vygotsky's Cultural-Historical Theory The Connection Between Forest School and Preschool Programs: A Comparison Study Management of Artistic Practice Pedagogies of Interdisciplinary Art Students With Critical Analysis Learning Method Online Counseling through the Eyes of University Students Uzaktan Eğitim Kapsamında İlkokul İkinci Sınıf Türkçe Dersinde Çocuklar İçin Felsefe Eğitimi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1