Dinesh D’Souza as a Comprador Intellectual: Punditry, Media and Neocolonialism

Q4 Social Sciences Socialism and Democracy Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1080/08854300.2020.1828700
G. Andrade
{"title":"Dinesh D’Souza as a Comprador Intellectual: Punditry, Media and Neocolonialism","authors":"G. Andrade","doi":"10.1080/08854300.2020.1828700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The neo-conservative movement in the United States has strong intellectual origins. Many of its founding members were radicals – heavily influenced by Leon Trotsky – who eventually became disillusioned with the New Left and the Counterculture movement (Stintson 2010). Thus, a growing number of college professors and other scholars eventually gathered into a group that began in the 1970s to lobby Republican governments. Neoconservatives shifted to the right, but they never moved away from Trotsky’s internationalism. Thus, they began to embrace a neocolonial perspective in their intellectual struggle against Soviet Communism. They enthusiastically supported American military interventions abroad. Their influence grew significantly under Ronald Reagan. One of the younger members of the neoconservative movement, Dinesh D’Souza, was fascinated by Reagan’s political style. D’Souza would go on to develop an academic career, and in his writings andmedia appearances, has consistently praised Reagan’s legacy (D’Souza 1999). Neoconservatives, in turn, also began to mold their movement with many of Reagan’s principles, most notably unregulated capitalism. By the 2000s, the neoconservatives in American policy were hegemonic in the White House, and George W. Bush’s administration employed many of its representatives as advisors and executives. It is fairly certain that the neoconservatives’ intellectual influence was a significant driving force in the American invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq (Vaisse 2010). The Republican candidate John McCain lost the election in 2008, and neoconservatives naturally did not have the same influence as Socialism and Democracy, 2020 Vol. 34, Nos. 2–3, 61–83, https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2020.1828700","PeriodicalId":40061,"journal":{"name":"Socialism and Democracy","volume":"1 1","pages":"61 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialism and Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2020.1828700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The neo-conservative movement in the United States has strong intellectual origins. Many of its founding members were radicals – heavily influenced by Leon Trotsky – who eventually became disillusioned with the New Left and the Counterculture movement (Stintson 2010). Thus, a growing number of college professors and other scholars eventually gathered into a group that began in the 1970s to lobby Republican governments. Neoconservatives shifted to the right, but they never moved away from Trotsky’s internationalism. Thus, they began to embrace a neocolonial perspective in their intellectual struggle against Soviet Communism. They enthusiastically supported American military interventions abroad. Their influence grew significantly under Ronald Reagan. One of the younger members of the neoconservative movement, Dinesh D’Souza, was fascinated by Reagan’s political style. D’Souza would go on to develop an academic career, and in his writings andmedia appearances, has consistently praised Reagan’s legacy (D’Souza 1999). Neoconservatives, in turn, also began to mold their movement with many of Reagan’s principles, most notably unregulated capitalism. By the 2000s, the neoconservatives in American policy were hegemonic in the White House, and George W. Bush’s administration employed many of its representatives as advisors and executives. It is fairly certain that the neoconservatives’ intellectual influence was a significant driving force in the American invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq (Vaisse 2010). The Republican candidate John McCain lost the election in 2008, and neoconservatives naturally did not have the same influence as Socialism and Democracy, 2020 Vol. 34, Nos. 2–3, 61–83, https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2020.1828700
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为买办知识分子的迪内什·德索萨:权威、媒体和新殖民主义
美国的新保守主义运动有很强的思想根源。它的许多创始成员都是激进分子——深受莱昂·托洛茨基的影响——他们最终对新左派和反文化运动感到幻灭(斯廷森,2010)。因此,从20世纪70年代开始,越来越多的大学教授和其他学者最终聚集成一个游说共和党政府的团体。新保守主义者转向右翼,但他们从未离开托洛茨基的国际主义。因此,他们开始在反对苏联共产主义的思想斗争中接受新殖民主义的观点。他们热情地支持美国的海外军事干预。在罗纳德·里根的领导下,他们的影响力显著增强。新保守主义运动的年轻成员迪内什·德索萨(Dinesh D 'Souza)被里根的政治风格所吸引。D 'Souza将继续发展自己的学术生涯,在他的著作和媒体露面中,他一直赞扬里根的遗产(D 'Souza 1999)。反过来,新保守主义者也开始用里根的许多原则来塑造他们的运动,最明显的是不受管制的资本主义。到21世纪初,美国政策中的新保守主义者在白宫占据了主导地位,乔治·w·布什(George W. Bush)政府聘用了许多新保守主义者的代表担任顾问和高管。相当肯定的是,新保守主义者的思想影响是美国入侵阿富汗和伊拉克的重要推动力(Vaisse 2010)。共和党候选人约翰·麦凯恩在2008年的选举中失败,新保守主义者自然没有社会主义与民主那样的影响力,2020年第34卷,第2-3期,61-83期,https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2020.1828700
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Socialism and Democracy
Socialism and Democracy Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Socialism and Democracy is committed to showing the continuing relevance of socialist politics and vision. Socialism and Democracy brings together the worlds of scholarship and activism, theory and practice, to examine in depth the core issues and popular movements of our time. The perspective is broadly Marxist, encouraging not only critique of the status quo, but also informed analysis of the many different approaches to bringing about fundamental change, and seeking to integrate issues of race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity and nationality with the traditional focus on class. Articles reflect many disciplines; our geographical scope is global; authors include activists and independent scholars as well as academics.
期刊最新文献
Communism, Poetry: Communicating Vessels (Some Insubordinate Essays, 1999–2018)Darko Suvin, Communism, Poetry: Communicating Vessels (Some Insubordinate Essays, 1999–2018) (Toronto: Political Animal Press, 2020, 280 pp., $29.99) The Old Mole and the New Democratic Party: Why the NDP is an Impediment to Social Progress in Canada On N. K. Jemisin and Speculative Fiction as a Liberatory Space The Impact of Censorship on COVID-19 Policy Formation in the United States Tracing Homelands: Israel, Palestine, and the Claims of BelongingLinda Dittmar, Tracing Homelands: Israel, Palestine, and the Claims of Belonging (Northampton, MA: Olive Branch Press, 2023, 240 pp., $20)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1