The Roadblock of Contested Recognition: Identity-Based Justice Claims as an Obstacle to Peace Negotiations in Afghanistan

Arvid Bell
{"title":"The Roadblock of Contested Recognition: Identity-Based Justice Claims as an Obstacle to Peace Negotiations in Afghanistan","authors":"Arvid Bell","doi":"10.1163/15718069-12341289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resistance to negotiation and the continuation of violence dictate the course of events in the Afghanistan conflict. However, several studies have thoroughly explored the interests of the main parties to the conflict and a settlement that respects their key demands is possible. The current military situation resembles a “hurting stalemate,” which according to rationalist assumptions should compel the parties to move toward negotiations. This article argues that the main obstacle to negotiation is an underlying and unaddressed conflict of recognition between the United States, the Afghan government, and the Taliban. While each party believes it is driven by justice claims, they perceive their opponents to be driven by a hostile strategy informed by incompatible interests. Relying on the Cultural Theory of International Relations, this article explores the parties’ motives in the conflict, focusing on the need to strive for esteem and honor. It suggests that the reciprocal acknowledgement of legitimate identity-related justice claims could remove a key obstacle to formal negotiation.","PeriodicalId":29704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace","volume":"1997 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-12341289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Resistance to negotiation and the continuation of violence dictate the course of events in the Afghanistan conflict. However, several studies have thoroughly explored the interests of the main parties to the conflict and a settlement that respects their key demands is possible. The current military situation resembles a “hurting stalemate,” which according to rationalist assumptions should compel the parties to move toward negotiations. This article argues that the main obstacle to negotiation is an underlying and unaddressed conflict of recognition between the United States, the Afghan government, and the Taliban. While each party believes it is driven by justice claims, they perceive their opponents to be driven by a hostile strategy informed by incompatible interests. Relying on the Cultural Theory of International Relations, this article explores the parties’ motives in the conflict, focusing on the need to strive for esteem and honor. It suggests that the reciprocal acknowledgement of legitimate identity-related justice claims could remove a key obstacle to formal negotiation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有争议的承认的障碍:身份为基础的正义主张是阿富汗和平谈判的障碍
对谈判的抵制和暴力的继续决定了阿富汗冲突事件的走向。然而,有几项研究彻底探讨了冲突主要各方的利益,一项尊重其主要要求的解决办法是可能的。目前的军事局势类似于“令人痛苦的僵局”,根据理性主义者的假设,这应该迫使各方走向谈判。本文认为,谈判的主要障碍是美国、阿富汗政府和塔利班之间潜在的、尚未解决的承认冲突。虽然两党都认为自己是由正义诉求驱动的,但他们认为对手是由互不相容的利益驱动的敌对战略驱动的。本文以国际关系文化理论为基础,探讨了冲突各方的动机,重点探讨了争取尊重和荣誉的需要。它表明,相互承认与身份有关的合法司法要求可以消除正式谈判的一个关键障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Actioning social justice into the engineering curriculum Autonomía y comunidad: horizonte político de la apropiación tecnológica Autonomía tecnológica: la experiencia de Tosepan Limakxtum en la Sierra Norte de Puebla Diálogos Construcción colectiva de sensores de bajo costo como herramienta para el monitoreo de la calidad del aire y el cuidado de la vida en Puente Aranda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1