Realtime Drilling Geomechanics Aids Safe Drilling through Unstable Shales and Channel Sands of Wara Formations, Minagish Field, West Kuwait

Dakhil Rasheed Al Enezi, M. Hajeri, S.. Gholum, Swetalina Nath, T. Ahmad, Z. Ramadan, Showkat Osman, A. Ahmed, N. Al-Hamad, D. Kumar, M. Siam, S. Abdelbaset
{"title":"Realtime Drilling Geomechanics Aids Safe Drilling through Unstable Shales and Channel Sands of Wara Formations, Minagish Field, West Kuwait","authors":"Dakhil Rasheed Al Enezi, M. Hajeri, S.. Gholum, Swetalina Nath, T. Ahmad, Z. Ramadan, Showkat Osman, A. Ahmed, N. Al-Hamad, D. Kumar, M. Siam, S. Abdelbaset","doi":"10.2118/200929-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As part of any successful development plan of any hydrocarbon field, drilling boreholes safely is a key factor to make the entire process safe, economic and environmentally friendly. One of the main factors that dictates whether a borehole is going to be drilled safely or not is to understand the geomichanical behavior of the different formation to be penetrated. A definition of geomechanics could be stated as the science that studies the relationship between each of; in-situ stresses, rock mechanics, and the drilling fluid properties. In Kuwait and during the course of efforts to develop Wara channel sands in Minagish Field to the west of the country, Kuwait Oil Company (KOC) realized that continuing to drill development wells using conventional drilling practices is not any more an easy task. Considerable non-productive time has been recorded due encountering events such as shale carvings and pack off leading to stuck pipe. In addition, partial to total lost circulation were faced while drilling through Mutriba Formation which added to the complexity of problem.\n This study involved gathering data from offset wells to build a mechanical earth model for the area where the new well is going to be drilled. The main objective of having the model built is to perform wellbore stability analysis (WBS) and compute the quantitative mud window values to insure stable and safe borehole drilling.\n As the case of any study, performing reliable WBS analysis requires accurate modeling of earth stresses and rock mechanical properties. This process is primarily based on sonic logs (compressional and shear slowness), formation bulk density and lithology distribution. The study started with an audit of the available data sets in the region to select the best offset wells and generating empirical correlations to fill- up any missing and/or poor-quality data zones. Initially,7offset wells were identified, based on the geological distribution and data availability.Out of them, only four wells were found to have compressional slowness and three with bulk density measurements. However, it is worth mentioning that no shear slowness measurements were available in any of the offset wells in the region. Due to this, a correlation based compressional-shear relationship from nearby wells was proposed for the pre-drill study.\n The mechanical properties were characterized using the tri-axial core test results available from Wara and Burgan Formations. Empirical correlations were developed to obtain static mechanical properties from the dynamical mechanical ones and log responses. In addition, horizontal stresses in the region were constrained with formation integrity test data to have better control on the model. Finally, after the WBS model was built,it was compared to the available caliper data from the offset wells for calibration purposes.\n The resulted pre-drill geomechanics model was used to advise on the drilling parameters (mud weight) to be used in drilling the new development well. Moreover, and being the first realtime drilling geomechanics (RTDG) job in in Kuwait, an LWD sonic was used while drilling to supply the pre-drill model with realtime compressional and shear slowness measurements. Having the model updated in realtime with data from the formation at the borehole location resulted in optimizing the mud weight window limits by the geomechanics engineers as the well was being drilled. Following these mud weight recommendations based on the updated pre-drill model resulted in a smooth landing and horizontal sections in which all the wiper trips until the final pull out of hole were smooth.","PeriodicalId":11075,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, June 28, 2021","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, June 28, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/200929-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As part of any successful development plan of any hydrocarbon field, drilling boreholes safely is a key factor to make the entire process safe, economic and environmentally friendly. One of the main factors that dictates whether a borehole is going to be drilled safely or not is to understand the geomichanical behavior of the different formation to be penetrated. A definition of geomechanics could be stated as the science that studies the relationship between each of; in-situ stresses, rock mechanics, and the drilling fluid properties. In Kuwait and during the course of efforts to develop Wara channel sands in Minagish Field to the west of the country, Kuwait Oil Company (KOC) realized that continuing to drill development wells using conventional drilling practices is not any more an easy task. Considerable non-productive time has been recorded due encountering events such as shale carvings and pack off leading to stuck pipe. In addition, partial to total lost circulation were faced while drilling through Mutriba Formation which added to the complexity of problem. This study involved gathering data from offset wells to build a mechanical earth model for the area where the new well is going to be drilled. The main objective of having the model built is to perform wellbore stability analysis (WBS) and compute the quantitative mud window values to insure stable and safe borehole drilling. As the case of any study, performing reliable WBS analysis requires accurate modeling of earth stresses and rock mechanical properties. This process is primarily based on sonic logs (compressional and shear slowness), formation bulk density and lithology distribution. The study started with an audit of the available data sets in the region to select the best offset wells and generating empirical correlations to fill- up any missing and/or poor-quality data zones. Initially,7offset wells were identified, based on the geological distribution and data availability.Out of them, only four wells were found to have compressional slowness and three with bulk density measurements. However, it is worth mentioning that no shear slowness measurements were available in any of the offset wells in the region. Due to this, a correlation based compressional-shear relationship from nearby wells was proposed for the pre-drill study. The mechanical properties were characterized using the tri-axial core test results available from Wara and Burgan Formations. Empirical correlations were developed to obtain static mechanical properties from the dynamical mechanical ones and log responses. In addition, horizontal stresses in the region were constrained with formation integrity test data to have better control on the model. Finally, after the WBS model was built,it was compared to the available caliper data from the offset wells for calibration purposes. The resulted pre-drill geomechanics model was used to advise on the drilling parameters (mud weight) to be used in drilling the new development well. Moreover, and being the first realtime drilling geomechanics (RTDG) job in in Kuwait, an LWD sonic was used while drilling to supply the pre-drill model with realtime compressional and shear slowness measurements. Having the model updated in realtime with data from the formation at the borehole location resulted in optimizing the mud weight window limits by the geomechanics engineers as the well was being drilled. Following these mud weight recommendations based on the updated pre-drill model resulted in a smooth landing and horizontal sections in which all the wiper trips until the final pull out of hole were smooth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实时钻井地质力学有助于在科威特西部Minagish油田Wara地层的不稳定页岩和通道砂中安全钻井
作为任何油气田成功开发计划的一部分,安全钻井是确保整个过程安全、经济和环保的关键因素。决定井眼能否安全钻进的主要因素之一是了解不同地层的地质力学行为。地质力学的定义可以被描述为一门研究各种地质因素之间关系的科学;地应力、岩石力学和钻井液性质。在科威特西部Minagish油田,在努力开发Wara水道砂的过程中,科威特石油公司(KOC)意识到,继续使用常规钻井方法钻开发井不再是一件容易的事情。由于遇到页岩雕刻和充填导致卡钻等事件,记录了相当多的非生产时间。此外,在穿过Mutriba地层时,还面临着部分或全部漏失的问题,这增加了问题的复杂性。这项研究包括从邻井收集数据,为新井将要钻探的地区建立一个机械地球模型。建立模型的主要目的是进行井筒稳定性分析(WBS),并计算定量泥浆窗口值,以确保稳定和安全的钻孔。与任何研究一样,进行可靠的WBS分析需要精确的地应力和岩石力学特性建模。该过程主要基于声波测井(压缩和剪切慢度)、地层体积密度和岩性分布。该研究首先对该地区的可用数据集进行审计,以选择最佳的邻井,并生成经验相关性,以填补任何缺失和/或质量较差的数据区域。最初,根据地质分布和数据可用性,确定了7口邻井。在这些井中,只有4口井发现了压缩慢速,3口井测量了体积密度。然而,值得一提的是,该地区的任何一口邻井都没有进行剪切慢度测量。为此,提出了一种基于邻近井压剪关系的相关性方法,用于钻前研究。利用Wara和Burgan地层的三轴岩心测试结果对其力学性能进行了表征。建立了经验相关关系,从动态力学特性和对数响应中获得静态力学特性。此外,地层完整性测试数据约束了该区域的水平应力,以便更好地控制模型。最后,在建立WBS模型后,将其与邻井的现有卡钳数据进行比较,以进行校准。利用所得到的钻前地质力学模型,对新开发井的钻井参数(泥浆比重)提出建议。此外,作为科威特首个实时钻井地质力学(RTDG)作业,在钻井过程中使用了随钻声波测井,为钻前模型提供了实时的纵波和剪切慢度测量数据。利用井眼位置的地层数据实时更新模型,地质力学工程师可以在钻井过程中优化泥浆比重窗口限制。根据这些基于更新的钻前模型的泥浆比重建议,实现了平稳的下入和水平段,直到最终出井为止,所有的刮水器起下钻都是平稳的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prediction of Energy Consumption by Ships at the port using Deep Learning A Review on future challenges and concerns associated with an Internet of Things based automatic health monitoring system Energy Efficient Data Mining Approach for Estimating the Diabetes Comparative Analysis of Modelling for Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Solutions SDN Controller and Blockchain to Secure Information Transaction in a Cluster Structure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1