In-hospital Outcome of Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction with Right Ventricular Dysfunction

Md. Iqbal Hossain, Mohammad Ullah, M. Rahman, Md Bonday Ali, M. A. K. Akanda
{"title":"In-hospital Outcome of Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction with Right Ventricular Dysfunction","authors":"Md. Iqbal Hossain, Mohammad Ullah, M. Rahman, Md Bonday Ali, M. A. K. Akanda","doi":"10.3329/cardio.v14i2.58777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), attention paid mainly to the left ventricle. The predictive significance of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in patients with anterior STEMI has been frequently neglected. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic effect of RV dysfunction on in-hospital outcomes in patients with first anterior STEMI.\nMethods: Present study is based on the analysis of 77 patients admitted to Coronary care unit of the Sir Salimullah Medical College & Mitford Hospital, Dhaka during April, 2019 to March, 2020, with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. 12 lead ECG with thorough physical examination was done along with echocardiographic assessment of RV and LV function within index hospitalization, preferably within 24 hours of admission. Patients were divided into two groups depending on right ventricular function assessment. Group I included anterior MI with right ventricular dysfunction and group II included anterior MI without right ventricular dysfunction. In hospital outcomes were observed and compared between two groups.\nResults: Patients with RV dysfunction had statistically significant higher incidence of cardiogenic shock (22.2 % vs. 2.4%, p < 0.05), acute heart failure (69.4% vs. 24.4%, p < 0.05), arrhythmia (11.1% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.05), increase length of hospital stay in patients of RV dysfunction group. In-hospital mortality was non significantly higher in RV dysfunction group (8.3% vs. 2.4%, p > 0.305).\nConclusion: In this study, we observed that in-hospital outcomes were worse in patients with anterior STEMI with RV dysfunction and demands more intense invasive management. Thus, special care should be given for the assessment function of right ventricle in anterior STEMI.\nCardiovasc j 2022; 14(2): 128-134","PeriodicalId":9438,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/cardio.v14i2.58777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), attention paid mainly to the left ventricle. The predictive significance of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in patients with anterior STEMI has been frequently neglected. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic effect of RV dysfunction on in-hospital outcomes in patients with first anterior STEMI. Methods: Present study is based on the analysis of 77 patients admitted to Coronary care unit of the Sir Salimullah Medical College & Mitford Hospital, Dhaka during April, 2019 to March, 2020, with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. 12 lead ECG with thorough physical examination was done along with echocardiographic assessment of RV and LV function within index hospitalization, preferably within 24 hours of admission. Patients were divided into two groups depending on right ventricular function assessment. Group I included anterior MI with right ventricular dysfunction and group II included anterior MI without right ventricular dysfunction. In hospital outcomes were observed and compared between two groups. Results: Patients with RV dysfunction had statistically significant higher incidence of cardiogenic shock (22.2 % vs. 2.4%, p < 0.05), acute heart failure (69.4% vs. 24.4%, p < 0.05), arrhythmia (11.1% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.05), increase length of hospital stay in patients of RV dysfunction group. In-hospital mortality was non significantly higher in RV dysfunction group (8.3% vs. 2.4%, p > 0.305). Conclusion: In this study, we observed that in-hospital outcomes were worse in patients with anterior STEMI with RV dysfunction and demands more intense invasive management. Thus, special care should be given for the assessment function of right ventricle in anterior STEMI. Cardiovasc j 2022; 14(2): 128-134
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性前壁心肌梗死合并右室功能障碍的住院疗效
背景:在st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)中,人们主要关注左心室。右心室功能障碍在STEMI前路患者中的预测意义经常被忽视。在这项研究中,我们评估了右心室功能障碍对首次前路STEMI患者住院预后的影响。方法:本研究基于2019年4月至2020年3月在达卡Sir Salimullah医学院& Mitford医院冠状动脉监护室收治的77例急性前壁心肌梗死患者的分析。12导联心电图伴全面体格检查,超声心动图评估左室和左室功能,最好在入院24小时内完成。根据右心室功能评分将患者分为两组。I组为前路心肌梗死伴右室功能不全组,II组为前路心肌梗死伴右室功能不全组。观察两组的住院情况并进行比较。结果:右心室功能障碍组心源性休克发生率(22.2% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.05)、急性心力衰竭发生率(69.4% vs. 24.4%, p < 0.05)、心律失常发生率(11.1% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.05)、住院时间延长均有统计学意义。右心室功能障碍组住院死亡率无显著性增高(8.3% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.05)。结论:在本研究中,我们观察到伴有左心室功能障碍的STEMI前路患者的住院预后更差,需要更强的侵入性治疗。因此,在评估STEMI前路右心室功能时应特别注意。心血管病杂志[j] 2022;14 (2): 128 - 134
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Early Outcome of Off-Pump Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery in Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in a Specialized center in Bangladesh Historic photos related to Cardiac Surgery in Bangladesh Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcome Between Intermittent Intravenous Heparin versus Continuous Heparin Infusion after Initial Bolus Dose during Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Use of the Left Ventricular Internal Dimension at End-Diastole and the Mitral Valve E-Point Septal Separation Ratio in the Prediction of the Left Ventricular Systolic Function Remembering Christiaan Barnard in Philately
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1