MLHarness: A scalable benchmarking system for MLCommons

Yen-Hsiang Chang , Jianhao Pu , Wen-mei Hwu , Jinjun Xiong
{"title":"MLHarness: A scalable benchmarking system for MLCommons","authors":"Yen-Hsiang Chang ,&nbsp;Jianhao Pu ,&nbsp;Wen-mei Hwu ,&nbsp;Jinjun Xiong","doi":"10.1016/j.tbench.2021.100002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the society’s growing adoption of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) for various intelligent solutions, it becomes increasingly imperative to standardize a common set of measures for ML/DL models with large scale open datasets under common development practices and resources so that people can benchmark and compare models’ quality and performance on a common ground. MLCommons has emerged recently as a driving force from both industry and academia to orchestrate such an effort. Despite its wide adoption as standardized benchmarks, MLCommons Inference has only included a limited number of ML/DL models (in fact seven models in total). This significantly limits the generality of MLCommons Inference’s benchmarking results because there are many more novel ML/DL models from the research community, solving a wide range of problems with different inputs and outputs modalities. To address such a limitation, we propose MLHarness, a scalable benchmarking harness system for MLCommons Inference with three distinctive features: (1) it codifies the standard benchmark process as defined by MLCommons Inference including the models, datasets, DL frameworks, and software and hardware systems; (2) it provides an easy and declarative approach for model developers to contribute their models and datasets to MLCommons Inference; and (3) it includes the support of a wide range of models with varying inputs/outputs modalities so that we can scalably benchmark these models across different datasets, frameworks, and hardware systems. This harness system is developed on top of the MLModelScope system, and will be open sourced to the community. Our experimental results demonstrate the superior flexibility and scalability of this harness system for MLCommons Inference benchmarking.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100155,"journal":{"name":"BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations","volume":"1 1","pages":"Article 100002"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772485921000028/pdfft?md5=7f9c2c5bfe8e2572b956bae3089e8207&pid=1-s2.0-S2772485921000028-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772485921000028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

With the society’s growing adoption of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) for various intelligent solutions, it becomes increasingly imperative to standardize a common set of measures for ML/DL models with large scale open datasets under common development practices and resources so that people can benchmark and compare models’ quality and performance on a common ground. MLCommons has emerged recently as a driving force from both industry and academia to orchestrate such an effort. Despite its wide adoption as standardized benchmarks, MLCommons Inference has only included a limited number of ML/DL models (in fact seven models in total). This significantly limits the generality of MLCommons Inference’s benchmarking results because there are many more novel ML/DL models from the research community, solving a wide range of problems with different inputs and outputs modalities. To address such a limitation, we propose MLHarness, a scalable benchmarking harness system for MLCommons Inference with three distinctive features: (1) it codifies the standard benchmark process as defined by MLCommons Inference including the models, datasets, DL frameworks, and software and hardware systems; (2) it provides an easy and declarative approach for model developers to contribute their models and datasets to MLCommons Inference; and (3) it includes the support of a wide range of models with varying inputs/outputs modalities so that we can scalably benchmark these models across different datasets, frameworks, and hardware systems. This harness system is developed on top of the MLModelScope system, and will be open sourced to the community. Our experimental results demonstrate the superior flexibility and scalability of this harness system for MLCommons Inference benchmarking.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MLHarness:一个可扩展的MLCommons基准测试系统
随着社会对各种智能解决方案越来越多地采用机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL),在共同的开发实践和资源下,标准化一套具有大规模开放数据集的ML/DL模型的通用度量变得越来越必要,以便人们可以在共同的基础上基准测试和比较模型的质量和性能。MLCommons最近作为工业界和学术界的一股推动力量出现,以协调这一努力。尽管作为标准化基准被广泛采用,MLCommons Inference只包含了有限数量的ML/DL模型(实际上总共有7个模型)。这极大地限制了MLCommons Inference基准测试结果的通用性,因为研究界有更多新颖的ML/DL模型,用不同的输入和输出模式解决了广泛的问题。为了解决这一限制,我们提出了MLHarness,这是一个可扩展的MLCommons Inference基准测试系统,具有三个显著特征:(1)它将MLCommons Inference定义的标准基准测试过程编码,包括模型、数据集、深度学习框架以及软件和硬件系统;(2)它为模型开发人员提供了一种简单的声明性方法,可以将他们的模型和数据集贡献给MLCommons Inference;(3)它包括对具有不同输入/输出模式的广泛模型的支持,以便我们可以跨不同的数据集、框架和硬件系统对这些模型进行可扩展的基准测试。这个线束系统是在MLModelScope系统的基础上开发的,并将向社区开放源代码。我们的实验结果表明,该控制系统具有优越的灵活性和可扩展性,可用于MLCommons Inference基准测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of mechanical properties of natural fiber based polymer composite Could bibliometrics reveal top science and technology achievements and researchers? The case for evaluatology-based science and technology evaluation Table of Contents BinCodex: A comprehensive and multi-level dataset for evaluating binary code similarity detection techniques Analyzing the impact of opportunistic maintenance optimization on manufacturing industries in Bangladesh: An empirical study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1