Jacob J. Pozin, A. Devonshire, Kevin Tom, M. Makhija, A. M. Singh
{"title":"Legume and Sesame Oral Food Challenge Outcomes","authors":"Jacob J. Pozin, A. Devonshire, Kevin Tom, M. Makhija, A. M. Singh","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-113278/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background: Legume and sesame are emerging food allergens. The utility of specific IgE testing (sIgE) to predict clinical reactivity to these allergens is not well described.Objective: To describe clinical outcomes and sIgE in sesame and legume OFCs. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 74 legume and sesame oral food challenges (OFC) performed between 2007-2017 at the Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago. Clinical data, OFC outcome, and sIgE to legume and sesame were collected. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and logistic regression models predicting OFC outcome were generated. Results: Twenty-eight patients (median age 6.15 years) passed legume OFC (84.85%), and twenty-five patients (median age 5.91 years) passed sesame OFC (60.98%). The median sIgE to legume was 1.41 kUa/L, and 2.34 kUa/L, to sesame. For patients who failed legume OFC, 67% had cutaneous, 16.5% had gastrointestinal, and 16.5% had anaphylaxis. Of these reactions, 80% were controlled with Benadryl alone and 20% required epinephrine. For patients who failed sesame OFC, 53% had cutaneous, 12% had gastrointestinal, and 35% had anaphylaxis. Of these reactions, 6% required epinephrine, 31% were controlled with Benadryl alone, and 63% required additional epinephrine or steroids. Conclusion: Most OFC to legumes were passed and reactions to failed legume OFCs were more likely to be non-severe. Failing an OFC to sesame was almost twice as likely compared to failing a legume OFC, and reactions to failed sesame OFC were often more severe. Sesame sIgE did not correlate with OFC outcome.","PeriodicalId":73751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food allergy","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-113278/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Legume and sesame are emerging food allergens. The utility of specific IgE testing (sIgE) to predict clinical reactivity to these allergens is not well described.Objective: To describe clinical outcomes and sIgE in sesame and legume OFCs. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 74 legume and sesame oral food challenges (OFC) performed between 2007-2017 at the Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago. Clinical data, OFC outcome, and sIgE to legume and sesame were collected. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and logistic regression models predicting OFC outcome were generated. Results: Twenty-eight patients (median age 6.15 years) passed legume OFC (84.85%), and twenty-five patients (median age 5.91 years) passed sesame OFC (60.98%). The median sIgE to legume was 1.41 kUa/L, and 2.34 kUa/L, to sesame. For patients who failed legume OFC, 67% had cutaneous, 16.5% had gastrointestinal, and 16.5% had anaphylaxis. Of these reactions, 80% were controlled with Benadryl alone and 20% required epinephrine. For patients who failed sesame OFC, 53% had cutaneous, 12% had gastrointestinal, and 35% had anaphylaxis. Of these reactions, 6% required epinephrine, 31% were controlled with Benadryl alone, and 63% required additional epinephrine or steroids. Conclusion: Most OFC to legumes were passed and reactions to failed legume OFCs were more likely to be non-severe. Failing an OFC to sesame was almost twice as likely compared to failing a legume OFC, and reactions to failed sesame OFC were often more severe. Sesame sIgE did not correlate with OFC outcome.
背景:豆类和芝麻是新兴的食物过敏原。特异性IgE测试(sIgE)用于预测这些过敏原的临床反应性的效用尚未得到很好的描述。目的:探讨芝麻、豆科OFCs的临床疗效和sIgE。方法:我们对2007-2017年在芝加哥Ann & Robert H. Lurie儿童医院进行的74例豆类和芝麻口腔食物挑战(OFC)进行了回顾性分析。收集临床数据、OFC结果和豆类和芝麻的sIgE。建立预测OFC预后的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)和logistic回归模型。结果:豆科OFC合格率28例(中位年龄6.15岁),占84.85%;芝麻科OFC合格率25例(中位年龄5.91岁),占60.98%。豆科植物的平均sIgE为1.41 kUa/L,芝麻为2.34 kUa/L。对于豆科OFC失败的患者,67%为皮肤过敏,16.5%为胃肠道过敏,16.5%为过敏反应。在这些反应中,80%只用苯海拉明控制,20%需要肾上腺素。对于芝麻OFC失败的患者,53%有皮肤反应,12%有胃肠道反应,35%有过敏反应。在这些反应中,6%需要肾上腺素,31%只用苯海拉明控制,63%需要额外的肾上腺素或类固醇。结论:对豆科植物的OFC大部分通过,对失败的OFC反应更可能是非严重的。芝麻的OFC失败的可能性几乎是豆类OFC失败的两倍,芝麻OFC失败的反应通常更严重。芝麻sIgE与OFC结果无关。