Legume and Sesame Oral Food Challenge Outcomes

Jacob J. Pozin, A. Devonshire, Kevin Tom, M. Makhija, A. M. Singh
{"title":"Legume and Sesame Oral Food Challenge Outcomes","authors":"Jacob J. Pozin, A. Devonshire, Kevin Tom, M. Makhija, A. M. Singh","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-113278/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background: Legume and sesame are emerging food allergens. The utility of specific IgE testing (sIgE) to predict clinical reactivity to these allergens is not well described.Objective: To describe clinical outcomes and sIgE in sesame and legume OFCs. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 74 legume and sesame oral food challenges (OFC) performed between 2007-2017 at the Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago. Clinical data, OFC outcome, and sIgE to legume and sesame were collected. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and logistic regression models predicting OFC outcome were generated. Results: Twenty-eight patients (median age 6.15 years) passed legume OFC (84.85%), and twenty-five patients (median age 5.91 years) passed sesame OFC (60.98%). The median sIgE to legume was 1.41 kUa/L, and 2.34 kUa/L, to sesame. For patients who failed legume OFC, 67% had cutaneous, 16.5% had gastrointestinal, and 16.5% had anaphylaxis. Of these reactions, 80% were controlled with Benadryl alone and 20% required epinephrine. For patients who failed sesame OFC, 53% had cutaneous, 12% had gastrointestinal, and 35% had anaphylaxis. Of these reactions, 6% required epinephrine, 31% were controlled with Benadryl alone, and 63% required additional epinephrine or steroids. Conclusion: Most OFC to legumes were passed and reactions to failed legume OFCs were more likely to be non-severe. Failing an OFC to sesame was almost twice as likely compared to failing a legume OFC, and reactions to failed sesame OFC were often more severe. Sesame sIgE did not correlate with OFC outcome.","PeriodicalId":73751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food allergy","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-113278/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Legume and sesame are emerging food allergens. The utility of specific IgE testing (sIgE) to predict clinical reactivity to these allergens is not well described.Objective: To describe clinical outcomes and sIgE in sesame and legume OFCs. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 74 legume and sesame oral food challenges (OFC) performed between 2007-2017 at the Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago. Clinical data, OFC outcome, and sIgE to legume and sesame were collected. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and logistic regression models predicting OFC outcome were generated. Results: Twenty-eight patients (median age 6.15 years) passed legume OFC (84.85%), and twenty-five patients (median age 5.91 years) passed sesame OFC (60.98%). The median sIgE to legume was 1.41 kUa/L, and 2.34 kUa/L, to sesame. For patients who failed legume OFC, 67% had cutaneous, 16.5% had gastrointestinal, and 16.5% had anaphylaxis. Of these reactions, 80% were controlled with Benadryl alone and 20% required epinephrine. For patients who failed sesame OFC, 53% had cutaneous, 12% had gastrointestinal, and 35% had anaphylaxis. Of these reactions, 6% required epinephrine, 31% were controlled with Benadryl alone, and 63% required additional epinephrine or steroids. Conclusion: Most OFC to legumes were passed and reactions to failed legume OFCs were more likely to be non-severe. Failing an OFC to sesame was almost twice as likely compared to failing a legume OFC, and reactions to failed sesame OFC were often more severe. Sesame sIgE did not correlate with OFC outcome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
豆类和芝麻口腔食品挑战结果
背景:豆类和芝麻是新兴的食物过敏原。特异性IgE测试(sIgE)用于预测这些过敏原的临床反应性的效用尚未得到很好的描述。目的:探讨芝麻、豆科OFCs的临床疗效和sIgE。方法:我们对2007-2017年在芝加哥Ann & Robert H. Lurie儿童医院进行的74例豆类和芝麻口腔食物挑战(OFC)进行了回顾性分析。收集临床数据、OFC结果和豆类和芝麻的sIgE。建立预测OFC预后的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)和logistic回归模型。结果:豆科OFC合格率28例(中位年龄6.15岁),占84.85%;芝麻科OFC合格率25例(中位年龄5.91岁),占60.98%。豆科植物的平均sIgE为1.41 kUa/L,芝麻为2.34 kUa/L。对于豆科OFC失败的患者,67%为皮肤过敏,16.5%为胃肠道过敏,16.5%为过敏反应。在这些反应中,80%只用苯海拉明控制,20%需要肾上腺素。对于芝麻OFC失败的患者,53%有皮肤反应,12%有胃肠道反应,35%有过敏反应。在这些反应中,6%需要肾上腺素,31%只用苯海拉明控制,63%需要额外的肾上腺素或类固醇。结论:对豆科植物的OFC大部分通过,对失败的OFC反应更可能是非严重的。芝麻的OFC失败的可能性几乎是豆类OFC失败的两倍,芝麻OFC失败的反应通常更严重。芝麻sIgE与OFC结果无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The public health burden of parent-reported food allergy-related missed school days among US children. A decade of progress in prevention and management of food allergy and anaphylaxis. A diagnostic approach to IgE-mediated food allergy: A practical algorithm. Anaphylaxis: Definition and criteria. Epinephrine autoinjectors for individuals with food allergy: Who, how many, and when to use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1