In the Name of Humanitarianism: The Interim Federal Health Program and the Irregularization of Refugee Claimants

IF 0.9 Q3 DEMOGRAPHY Refuge Pub Date : 2018-12-10 DOI:10.7202/1055577AR
Laura Connoy
{"title":"In the Name of Humanitarianism: The Interim Federal Health Program and the Irregularization of Refugee Claimants","authors":"Laura Connoy","doi":"10.7202/1055577AR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 1957 Canada’s Interim Federal Health Program (IFHP) has provided health-care coverage to refugee populations. However, from June 2012 to April 2016 the program was drastically revised in ways that restricted or denied access to health-care coverage, specifically to refugee claimants—persons who have fed their country and made an asylum claim in another country. One of the main intentions of the revision was to protect the integrity of Canada’s humanitarian refugee determination system. However, this had a major unintended consequence: within everyday healthcare places like walk-in clinics, doctor’s offices, and hospitals, IFHP recipients were denied access to services, regardless of actual levels of coverage. In this article I analyze how these program restrictions were experienced within Toronto’s everyday health-care places through the concept of irregularization. I discuss how the IFHP, as a humanitarian health-care program, problematizes the presence of refugee claimants in ways that created experiences of vulnerability, insecurity, and anxiety. Building on this view, I conclude with a discussion of how activists who sought to draw attention to the experiences of refugee claimants in the aftermath of the IFHP revisions closed of truly transformative pathways toward social justice.","PeriodicalId":45974,"journal":{"name":"Refuge","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Refuge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1055577AR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 1957 Canada’s Interim Federal Health Program (IFHP) has provided health-care coverage to refugee populations. However, from June 2012 to April 2016 the program was drastically revised in ways that restricted or denied access to health-care coverage, specifically to refugee claimants—persons who have fed their country and made an asylum claim in another country. One of the main intentions of the revision was to protect the integrity of Canada’s humanitarian refugee determination system. However, this had a major unintended consequence: within everyday healthcare places like walk-in clinics, doctor’s offices, and hospitals, IFHP recipients were denied access to services, regardless of actual levels of coverage. In this article I analyze how these program restrictions were experienced within Toronto’s everyday health-care places through the concept of irregularization. I discuss how the IFHP, as a humanitarian health-care program, problematizes the presence of refugee claimants in ways that created experiences of vulnerability, insecurity, and anxiety. Building on this view, I conclude with a discussion of how activists who sought to draw attention to the experiences of refugee claimants in the aftermath of the IFHP revisions closed of truly transformative pathways toward social justice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以人道主义的名义:临时联邦保健方案和难民申请的非正规化
自1957年以来,加拿大的临时联邦保健方案(临保方案)向难民人口提供保健服务。然而,从2012年6月至2016年4月,该方案进行了大幅修订,限制或拒绝获得医疗保险,特别是难民申请人——在本国提供食物并在另一个国家提出庇护申请的人。修订的主要意图之一是保护加拿大人道主义难民确定制度的完整性。然而,这产生了一个意想不到的重大后果:在日常医疗场所,如无预约诊所、医生办公室和医院,临保方案的受助人被拒绝获得服务,无论实际覆盖水平如何。在这篇文章中,我通过不规则化的概念分析了这些计划限制是如何在多伦多的日常医疗保健场所中经历的。我讨论了临保方案作为一项人道主义保健计划,如何以创造脆弱、不安全和焦虑体验的方式,将难民申请者的存在问题化。在这一观点的基础上,我最后讨论了在临保方案修订后,那些试图引起人们注意难民申请人经历的活动家如何关闭了通往社会正义的真正变革之路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Refuge
Refuge DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
(Mis)trusted Contact: Resettlement Knowledge Assets and the Third Space of Refugee Reception Introduction: Special Issue on Private Sponsorship in Canada A Reflexive View of Refugee Integration and Inclusion: A Case Study of the Mennonite Central Committee and the Private Sponsorship of Refugees Program How Do Sponsors Think about "Month 13"? Forging African Communities: Mobility, Integration, and Belonging by Oliver Bakewell and Loren B. Landau (Eds.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1