Retinal pigment epithelium atrophy after epiretinal membrane and internal limiting membrane peeling: case reports

Nicolás Rivera-Valdivia, Hiroshi Maeda-Yasunaga, Pablo Cabal-López, Carlos Salgado-Cerrate, Carlos Abdala-Caballero
{"title":"Retinal pigment epithelium atrophy after epiretinal membrane and internal limiting membrane peeling: case reports","authors":"Nicolás Rivera-Valdivia, Hiroshi Maeda-Yasunaga, Pablo Cabal-López, Carlos Salgado-Cerrate, Carlos Abdala-Caballero","doi":"10.22336/rjo.2022.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To describe the development of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) atrophy after uncomplicated pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and/or internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in 2 patients. Cases description: Case 1: A 79-years-old female with diagnosis of a full-thickness macular hole in her right eye (OD) with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of: 20/100 and left eye (OS): 20/70. After surgery she developed large RPE hyperplasia and presented hand movement that did not improve with pinhole. Case 2: A 69-years-old female patient who had ERM in her OS with BCVA of 20/30 in both eyes (OU). PPV was assisted with brilliant blue (BB) to better visualize the ILM. During follow-up visits we evidenced RPE atrophy in the zone where peeling was done. In the last control after 2-years, her visual acuity was 20/40 that did not improve with pinhole. Discussion: There are three possible mechanisms to explain this complication: toxic damage, mechanical trauma during the membrane removal with forceps, or a combination of both. In our cases, a combination of them is probably the cause of the presence of RPE atrophy. Conclusion: Vitrectomy with membrane removal is successful in most cases with low rate of complications. Because RPE atrophy is infrequent, our suggestion is to continue performing this technique and if possible, it should be done without dye staining to minimize risks. Abbreviations: ERM = epiretinal membrane, ILM = internal limiting membrane, MH = macular hole, RPE = Retinal pigment epithelium, OD = right eye, BCVA = Best corrected visual acuity, OS = left eye, OU = both eyes, IOL = intraocular lens, OCT = Optical coherence tomography, BB = Brilliant blue, TB = Trypan blue, ICG = indocyanine green","PeriodicalId":21385,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","volume":"14 1","pages":"79 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2022.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the development of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) atrophy after uncomplicated pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and/or internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in 2 patients. Cases description: Case 1: A 79-years-old female with diagnosis of a full-thickness macular hole in her right eye (OD) with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of: 20/100 and left eye (OS): 20/70. After surgery she developed large RPE hyperplasia and presented hand movement that did not improve with pinhole. Case 2: A 69-years-old female patient who had ERM in her OS with BCVA of 20/30 in both eyes (OU). PPV was assisted with brilliant blue (BB) to better visualize the ILM. During follow-up visits we evidenced RPE atrophy in the zone where peeling was done. In the last control after 2-years, her visual acuity was 20/40 that did not improve with pinhole. Discussion: There are three possible mechanisms to explain this complication: toxic damage, mechanical trauma during the membrane removal with forceps, or a combination of both. In our cases, a combination of them is probably the cause of the presence of RPE atrophy. Conclusion: Vitrectomy with membrane removal is successful in most cases with low rate of complications. Because RPE atrophy is infrequent, our suggestion is to continue performing this technique and if possible, it should be done without dye staining to minimize risks. Abbreviations: ERM = epiretinal membrane, ILM = internal limiting membrane, MH = macular hole, RPE = Retinal pigment epithelium, OD = right eye, BCVA = Best corrected visual acuity, OS = left eye, OU = both eyes, IOL = intraocular lens, OCT = Optical coherence tomography, BB = Brilliant blue, TB = Trypan blue, ICG = indocyanine green
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视网膜前膜及内限制膜剥离后视网膜色素上皮萎缩1例
目的:分析2例单纯玻璃体切割(PPV)合并视网膜前膜(ERM)和/或内限制膜(ILM)剥离术后视网膜色素上皮(RPE)萎缩的发生情况。病例描述:病例1:79岁女性,诊断为右眼(OD)全层黄斑孔,最佳矫正视力(BCVA): 20/100,左眼(OS): 20/70。手术后,她出现了大的RPE增生,并表现出手部运动,针孔没有改善。病例2:69岁女性患者,OS有ERM,双眼BCVA为20/30 (OU)。PPV用亮蓝(BB)辅助,以更好地显示ILM。在随访中,我们证实在剥离的区域RPE萎缩。在2年后的最后一次对照中,她的视力为20/40,针孔没有改善。讨论:有三种可能的机制来解释这种并发症:中毒性损伤,钳取膜过程中的机械创伤,或两者的结合。在我们的病例中,它们的组合可能是导致RPE萎缩的原因。结论:玻璃体切除加脱膜手术成功率高,并发症发生率低。由于RPE萎缩并不常见,我们建议继续使用该技术,如果可能的话,应不进行染色以降低风险。缩写词:ERM =视网膜前膜,ILM =内限制膜,MH =黄斑孔,RPE =视网膜色素上皮,OD =右眼,BCVA =最佳矫正视力,OS =左眼,OU =双眼,IOL =人工晶状体,OCT =光学相干断层扫描,BB =亮蓝,TB =台锥蓝,ICG =吲吲胺绿
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rare case report: a 26-year-old man with Eales' disease. Apert Syndrome - caveats of squint management. Assessment of the efficacy of 0.1% cyclosporine A cationic emulsion in the treatment of dry eye disease during COVID-19 pandemic. Dynamics of the association between visual and auditory functional changes in glaucoma. Preliminary results. Decreased perifoveal ganglion cell complex thickness - a first sign for macular damage in patients using hydroxychloroquine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1