Graffiti in a Time of Covid-19: Spray Paint and the Law

S. Farran, Rhona K. M. Smith
{"title":"Graffiti in a Time of Covid-19: Spray Paint and the Law","authors":"S. Farran, Rhona K. M. Smith","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2021.1891612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the course of 2020 there have been plenty of restrictions on human rights, but there has also been what might be described as ‘artistic anarchy’. Particularly in the period of March–June 2020 when the UK was in ‘lockdown’, streets became awash with diverse rainbows, teddy bears, ribbons, and graffiti. For ten weeks through the summer of 2020, Thursdays at 8pm became a riotous mix of doorstep clapping, pot bashing, bells, pipes, horns and fireworks. No longer antisocial behaviour, or nuisance, but a community celebration of, and thanksgiving to, all key workers. Small acts of solidarity in a time of national crisis, perhaps, but also a stark U-turn in what is usually deemed acceptable societal behaviour. Graffiti artists played a part. Pieces by Banksy, Rebel Bear, less well-known, and anonymous artists have been lauded by the media and some reports have described such work as ‘murals’ rather than graffiti, thereby conferring a degree of artistic respectability, on what might otherwise be damned as vandalism. The change of perspective was illustrated by the upset caused when routine graffiti cleaning on London underground inadvertently removed a new Banksy. While some of this—as with pre-pandemic graffiti—is in ‘legal spaces’ set aside for graffiti across the country, or commissioned work, much of the graffiti on COVID-19 is in public places, on","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"1 1","pages":"84 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King's law journal : KLJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2021.1891612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the course of 2020 there have been plenty of restrictions on human rights, but there has also been what might be described as ‘artistic anarchy’. Particularly in the period of March–June 2020 when the UK was in ‘lockdown’, streets became awash with diverse rainbows, teddy bears, ribbons, and graffiti. For ten weeks through the summer of 2020, Thursdays at 8pm became a riotous mix of doorstep clapping, pot bashing, bells, pipes, horns and fireworks. No longer antisocial behaviour, or nuisance, but a community celebration of, and thanksgiving to, all key workers. Small acts of solidarity in a time of national crisis, perhaps, but also a stark U-turn in what is usually deemed acceptable societal behaviour. Graffiti artists played a part. Pieces by Banksy, Rebel Bear, less well-known, and anonymous artists have been lauded by the media and some reports have described such work as ‘murals’ rather than graffiti, thereby conferring a degree of artistic respectability, on what might otherwise be damned as vandalism. The change of perspective was illustrated by the upset caused when routine graffiti cleaning on London underground inadvertently removed a new Banksy. While some of this—as with pre-pandemic graffiti—is in ‘legal spaces’ set aside for graffiti across the country, or commissioned work, much of the graffiti on COVID-19 is in public places, on
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Covid-19时期的涂鸦:喷漆和法律
在2020年期间,有很多对人权的限制,但也有可能被描述为“艺术无政府状态”。特别是在2020年3月至6月期间,英国处于“封锁”状态,街头充斥着各种各样的彩虹、泰迪熊、丝带和涂鸦。在2020年夏天的十周时间里,周四晚上8点成为了一个充满狂欢的混合体,包括拍门、砸锅、铃声、笛子、喇叭和烟花。不再是反社会的行为,也不再是讨厌的行为,而是社区对所有关键员工的庆祝和感恩。在国家危机时期,这或许是小小的团结行动,但也可能是通常被视为可接受的社会行为的一个大转弯。涂鸦艺术家也起到了一定作用。班克西(Banksy)、叛逆熊(Rebel Bear)等不太知名的艺术家和匿名艺术家的作品受到了媒体的称赞,一些报道将这些作品描述为“壁画”而不是涂鸦,从而赋予了一定程度的艺术尊严,否则这些作品可能会被诅咒为破坏行为。当伦敦地铁的涂鸦清理工作无意中移走了班克西的一幅新画时,人们的不满情绪就说明了这种观点的转变。虽然其中一些涂鸦——就像大流行前的涂鸦一样——是在全国各地为涂鸦留出的“合法空间”里,或者是委托创作的,但大部分关于COVID-19的涂鸦都是在公共场所
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unity in diversity? Constitutional identities, deliberative processes and a ‘Border Poll’ in Ireland The Nation vs. the People. The unconstitutionality of secessionist referendums under Belgian constitutional law The impact of federalism on secession referendums: comparing Scotland and Québec Assessing the Legitimacy of Referendums as a Vehicle for Constitutional Amendment: Reform and Abolition of the Legislative Councils in Queensland and New South Wales Referendums and representation in democratic constitution making: Lessons from the failed Chilean constitutional experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1