Ransomware Mitigation in the Modern Era: A Comprehensive Review, Research Challenges, and Future Directions

Timothy R. McIntosh, A. Kayes, Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen, Alex Ng, P. Watters
{"title":"Ransomware Mitigation in the Modern Era: A Comprehensive Review, Research Challenges, and Future Directions","authors":"Timothy R. McIntosh, A. Kayes, Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen, Alex Ng, P. Watters","doi":"10.1145/3479393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although ransomware has been around since the early days of personal computers, its sophistication and aggression have increased substantially over the years. Ransomware, as a type of malware to extort ransom payments from victims, has evolved to deliver payloads in different attack vectors and on multiple platforms, and creating repeated disruptions and financial loss to many victims. Many studies have performed ransomware analysis and/or presented detection, defense, or prevention techniques for ransomware. However, because the ransomware landscape has evolved aggressively, many of those studies have become less relevant or even outdated. Previous surveys on anti-ransomware studies have compared the methods and results of the studies they surveyed, but none of those surveys has attempted to critique on the internal or external validity of those studies. In this survey, we first examined the up-to-date concept of ransomware, and listed the inadequacies in current ransomware research. We then proposed a set of unified metrics to evaluate published studies on ransomware mitigation, and applied the metrics to 118 such studies to comprehensively compare and contrast their pros and cons, with the attempt to evaluate their relative strengths and weaknesses. Finally, we forecast the future trends of ransomware evolution, and propose future research directions.","PeriodicalId":7000,"journal":{"name":"ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)","volume":"31 1","pages":"1 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3479393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Although ransomware has been around since the early days of personal computers, its sophistication and aggression have increased substantially over the years. Ransomware, as a type of malware to extort ransom payments from victims, has evolved to deliver payloads in different attack vectors and on multiple platforms, and creating repeated disruptions and financial loss to many victims. Many studies have performed ransomware analysis and/or presented detection, defense, or prevention techniques for ransomware. However, because the ransomware landscape has evolved aggressively, many of those studies have become less relevant or even outdated. Previous surveys on anti-ransomware studies have compared the methods and results of the studies they surveyed, but none of those surveys has attempted to critique on the internal or external validity of those studies. In this survey, we first examined the up-to-date concept of ransomware, and listed the inadequacies in current ransomware research. We then proposed a set of unified metrics to evaluate published studies on ransomware mitigation, and applied the metrics to 118 such studies to comprehensively compare and contrast their pros and cons, with the attempt to evaluate their relative strengths and weaknesses. Finally, we forecast the future trends of ransomware evolution, and propose future research directions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代勒索软件缓解:全面回顾、研究挑战和未来方向
尽管勒索软件早在个人电脑出现的早期就已经存在,但它的复杂性和攻击性在过去几年里大幅增加。勒索软件作为一种向受害者勒索赎金的恶意软件,已经发展到以不同的攻击媒介和多个平台提供有效载荷,并给许多受害者造成反复的中断和经济损失。许多研究已经进行了勒索软件分析和/或提出了勒索软件的检测、防御或预防技术。然而,由于勒索软件领域的迅猛发展,许多研究已经变得不那么相关,甚至过时了。之前关于反勒索软件研究的调查比较了他们所调查的研究的方法和结果,但这些调查都没有试图批评这些研究的内部或外部有效性。在本调查中,我们首先检查了勒索软件的最新概念,并列出了当前勒索软件研究的不足之处。然后,我们提出了一套统一的指标来评估已发表的勒索软件缓解研究,并将这些指标应用于118项此类研究,以全面比较和对比它们的优缺点,并试图评估它们的相对优势和劣势。最后,对勒索软件的未来发展趋势进行了预测,并提出了未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experimental Comparisons of Clustering Approaches for Data Representation On the Structure of the Boolean Satisfiability Problem: A Survey A Brief Overview of Universal Sentence Representation Methods: A Linguistic View The Eye in Extended Reality: A Survey on Gaze Interaction and Eye Tracking in Head-worn Extended Reality A Comprehensive Report on Machine Learning-based Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease using Multi-modal Neuroimaging Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1