A “Labyrinth of Uncertainties”: Penobscot River Islands, Land Assignments, and Indigenous Women Proprietors in Nineteenth-Century Maine

Micah A. Pawling
{"title":"A “Labyrinth of Uncertainties”: Penobscot River Islands, Land Assignments, and Indigenous Women Proprietors in Nineteenth-Century Maine","authors":"Micah A. Pawling","doi":"10.5250/AMERINDIQUAR.42.4.0454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In 1835 a unique dual property system developed within the Penobscot Indian Nation in Maine that involved a combination of individual land lots or private property holdings with reservation lands held in common for communal benefit. This dual land system permitted married women and couples to hold island lots at a time when, by the law of coverture, non-Native married women lost all property rights upon marriage. The coexistence of Penobscot reservation islands held in common with individual or family lots created a distinct land tenure that reinforced tribal ownership in powerful ways. The origin of the Penobscot land system reveals multiple Penobscot views of their changing homeland. Components of the Penobscot property system represented Indigenous values, specifically by guaranteeing to Penobscot married women and often their spouses the ability to own land at a time when few non-Native married women could legally own property in Maine. Penobscot families struggled with land transfers and the inheritance of lots under state supervision. By 1883 state commissioners had attempted to resolve competing claims as they affirmed Penobscot land title, a process that hindered further dispossession. Under this land system, many Penobscots expressed strong attachment to specific locations on their reservation islands, showing that their changing perceptions about land and property and, equally important, their connections to particular places were reminiscent of a much older view of their homeland, which was comprised of family hunting territories.","PeriodicalId":22216,"journal":{"name":"The American Indian Quarterly","volume":"53 1","pages":"454 - 487"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Indian Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5250/AMERINDIQUAR.42.4.0454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:In 1835 a unique dual property system developed within the Penobscot Indian Nation in Maine that involved a combination of individual land lots or private property holdings with reservation lands held in common for communal benefit. This dual land system permitted married women and couples to hold island lots at a time when, by the law of coverture, non-Native married women lost all property rights upon marriage. The coexistence of Penobscot reservation islands held in common with individual or family lots created a distinct land tenure that reinforced tribal ownership in powerful ways. The origin of the Penobscot land system reveals multiple Penobscot views of their changing homeland. Components of the Penobscot property system represented Indigenous values, specifically by guaranteeing to Penobscot married women and often their spouses the ability to own land at a time when few non-Native married women could legally own property in Maine. Penobscot families struggled with land transfers and the inheritance of lots under state supervision. By 1883 state commissioners had attempted to resolve competing claims as they affirmed Penobscot land title, a process that hindered further dispossession. Under this land system, many Penobscots expressed strong attachment to specific locations on their reservation islands, showing that their changing perceptions about land and property and, equally important, their connections to particular places were reminiscent of a much older view of their homeland, which was comprised of family hunting territories.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“不确定的迷宫”:19世纪缅因州的佩诺布斯科特河群岛、土地分配和土著妇女业主
摘要:1835年,缅因州佩诺布斯科特印第安民族形成了一种独特的双重财产制度,将个人土地或私有财产与公共保留土地相结合,以实现公共利益。这种双重土地制度允许已婚妇女和夫妇拥有岛屿土地,而根据土地所有权法,非土著已婚妇女在结婚后失去了所有财产权利。佩诺布斯科特保留岛屿与个人或家庭共同拥有的土地共存,创造了一种独特的土地权属,以强有力的方式加强了部落所有权。佩诺布斯考特人土地制度的起源揭示了佩诺布斯考特人对他们不断变化的家园的多种看法。佩诺布斯科特财产制度的组成部分代表了土著价值观,特别是保证佩诺布斯科特已婚妇女及其配偶拥有土地的能力,而当时在缅因州,很少有非土著已婚妇女能够合法拥有财产。佩诺布斯考特家族在土地转让和国家监督下的土地继承问题上挣扎。到1883年,州专员们试图通过确认佩诺布斯考特人的土地所有权来解决争议,这一过程阻止了进一步的剥夺。在这种土地制度下,许多佩诺布苏格兰人对其保留岛上的特定地点表现出强烈的依恋,这表明他们对土地和财产的不断变化的看法,同样重要的是,他们与特定地点的联系使人想起他们对家园的更古老的看法,家园是由家庭狩猎领土组成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Doodem and Council Fire: Anishinaabe Governance through Alliance by Heidi Bohaker (review) The Enduring Flame: Stress, Epigenetics, and the California Indian 1769–2000 Strawtown Koteewi: Indiana, NAGPRA, and the Culture of Noncompliance Choctaw Confederates: The American Civil War in Indian Country by Fay A. Yarbrough (review) Native American Rhetoric ed. by Lawrence W. Gross (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1