Editorial Comment: Study of kidney morphologic and structural changes related to different ischemia times and types of clamping of the renal vascular pedicle

L. Favorito
{"title":"Editorial Comment: Study of kidney morphologic and structural changes related to different ischemia times and types of clamping of the renal vascular pedicle","authors":"L. Favorito","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0559.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mazzeo and collegues from Sao Paulo Brazil shows in a very interesting paper the morphologic and structural changes of renal parenchyma during the clamping of the renal pedicle. Partial nephrectomy (open, laparoscopic or robotic) is considered the gold standard for treating localized renal tumors (1-6). Warm renal ischemia is commonly performed during partial nephrectomy to achieve a bloodless surgical field, however renal ischemia has been associated with renal function impairment (7). Previous studies shows that the swine is the most adequate model for comparison to human kidney anatomy and physiology (8, 9). Traditionally, 30 minutes is considered the maximum safe time for renal warm ischemia. In a recent study with swine model (10), the renal warm ischemia of 30 minutes by arterial clamping did not caused significant glomerular damage or nephron loss, but if an artery and vein (en bloc) clamping was used, the 30 minutes of warm ischemia caused a decrease in the number of glomeruli. In the present paper the authors shows that the number of renal parenchymal lesions derived from ischemia is associated with the duration of the insult, but a interesting result was the significant difference between the types of clamping, and the group with clamping of artery and vein presented a lower frequency of injuries than the group with only the renal artery clamping. According the results of this experimental study during a partial nephrectomy, the en bloc clamping for warm ischemia should be favored over only the renal artery clamping to minimize renal injury after partial nephrectomies, but more studies will be necessary in the future to confirm these results. EDITORIAL COMMENT Vol. 45 (4): 763-764, July August, 2019 doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0559.1","PeriodicalId":13674,"journal":{"name":"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology","volume":"50 1","pages":"763 - 764"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0559.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mazzeo and collegues from Sao Paulo Brazil shows in a very interesting paper the morphologic and structural changes of renal parenchyma during the clamping of the renal pedicle. Partial nephrectomy (open, laparoscopic or robotic) is considered the gold standard for treating localized renal tumors (1-6). Warm renal ischemia is commonly performed during partial nephrectomy to achieve a bloodless surgical field, however renal ischemia has been associated with renal function impairment (7). Previous studies shows that the swine is the most adequate model for comparison to human kidney anatomy and physiology (8, 9). Traditionally, 30 minutes is considered the maximum safe time for renal warm ischemia. In a recent study with swine model (10), the renal warm ischemia of 30 minutes by arterial clamping did not caused significant glomerular damage or nephron loss, but if an artery and vein (en bloc) clamping was used, the 30 minutes of warm ischemia caused a decrease in the number of glomeruli. In the present paper the authors shows that the number of renal parenchymal lesions derived from ischemia is associated with the duration of the insult, but a interesting result was the significant difference between the types of clamping, and the group with clamping of artery and vein presented a lower frequency of injuries than the group with only the renal artery clamping. According the results of this experimental study during a partial nephrectomy, the en bloc clamping for warm ischemia should be favored over only the renal artery clamping to minimize renal injury after partial nephrectomies, but more studies will be necessary in the future to confirm these results. EDITORIAL COMMENT Vol. 45 (4): 763-764, July August, 2019 doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0559.1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
编辑评论:不同缺血时间和肾血管蒂夹持方式对肾脏形态学和结构变化的影响研究
来自巴西圣保罗的Mazzeo及其同事在一篇非常有趣的论文中展示了肾蒂夹紧过程中肾实质的形态和结构变化。部分肾切除术(开放、腹腔镜或机器人)被认为是治疗局部肾肿瘤的金标准(1-6)。热肾缺血通常在部分肾切除术期间进行,以实现无血手术区,然而肾缺血与肾功能损害有关(7)。先前的研究表明,猪是与人类肾脏解剖和生理比较最合适的模型(8,9)。传统上,30分钟被认为是肾热缺血的最大安全时间。在最近的猪模型研究中(10),动脉夹持肾热缺血30分钟没有引起明显的肾小球损伤或肾单位损失,但如果采用动脉和静脉(整体)夹持,热缺血30分钟导致肾小球数量减少。在本文中,作者发现肾实质损伤的数量与损伤的持续时间有关,但一个有趣的结果是夹紧类型之间存在显著差异,动脉和静脉夹紧组的损伤频率低于仅肾动脉夹紧组。根据本实验研究结果,在部分肾切除术中,热缺血的整体夹持比仅肾动脉夹持更有利于减少部分肾切除术后肾损伤,但需要更多的研究来证实这些结果。编辑评论卷45(4):763-764,2019年7月8日doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0559.1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advocating hormonal treatment to prevent adult infertility in patients diagnosed with congenital undescended testes REPLY TO THE AUTHORS: Re: One-day voiding diary in the evaluation of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in children Vesical imaging reporting and data system (VI-RADS) in bladder cancer diagnosis in review in this number of International Brazilian Journal of Urology The evolution of stress urinary incontinence treatment techniques of the last three decades Impact of artificial urinary sphincter erosion in the reimplantation of the device
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1