Special Issue on “Recent Net Neutrality Polices in Europe and the US”

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Review of Network Economics Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI:10.1515/rne-2019-0029
Wolfgang Briglauer
{"title":"Special Issue on “Recent Net Neutrality Polices in Europe and the US”","authors":"Wolfgang Briglauer","doi":"10.1515/rne-2019-0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue presents five selected contributions from well-known scholars and policy experts to provide both academia and policy makers from the ICT sector with an overview of the economic impacts of recent net neutrality policy changes in the EU and the US. In both jurisdictions, fundamental policy shifts have been implemented in the last two decades with lengthy and controversial decision-making processes with strong political party affiliations on both sides of the Atlantic. This issue focuses on the history of net neutrality policy making in the EUand theUSwith a particular emphasis on themore recent 2015–2018 period duringwhichmajor policy changes occurred: The European net neutrality legislation was enacted in 2015. Its aim is to “guarantee the continued functioning of the internet ecosystem as an engine of innovation” by imposing net neutrality policies that prohibit any discriminatory uses of networkmanagement practices (such as blocking or throttling of lawful content) by Internet access service providers. In 2015, the US regulatory authority (Federal Communications Commission, FCC) enacted its 2015 Open Internet Order, in which the agency imposed the heavyhanded approach of adopting the 1930s-era rules for regulating monopoly telephone companies on broadband services. According to the Open Internet Order, strict net neutrality rules prohibit blocking, throttling and paid prioritization. Similar to the reasoning in the EU, the Open Internet Order should enhance a virtuous circle where “innovations at the edges of the network enhance consumer demand, leading to expanded investments in broadband infrastructure that, in turn, spark new innovations at the edge.” In 2017, the Federal Communications Commission’s Restoring Internet Freedom Order reversed its 2015 decision. Since then the regulatory regime in the US differs fundamentally from the rather strict regulations imposed in the EU.","PeriodicalId":45659,"journal":{"name":"Review of Network Economics","volume":"3 1","pages":"109 - 114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Network Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rne-2019-0029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This special issue presents five selected contributions from well-known scholars and policy experts to provide both academia and policy makers from the ICT sector with an overview of the economic impacts of recent net neutrality policy changes in the EU and the US. In both jurisdictions, fundamental policy shifts have been implemented in the last two decades with lengthy and controversial decision-making processes with strong political party affiliations on both sides of the Atlantic. This issue focuses on the history of net neutrality policy making in the EUand theUSwith a particular emphasis on themore recent 2015–2018 period duringwhichmajor policy changes occurred: The European net neutrality legislation was enacted in 2015. Its aim is to “guarantee the continued functioning of the internet ecosystem as an engine of innovation” by imposing net neutrality policies that prohibit any discriminatory uses of networkmanagement practices (such as blocking or throttling of lawful content) by Internet access service providers. In 2015, the US regulatory authority (Federal Communications Commission, FCC) enacted its 2015 Open Internet Order, in which the agency imposed the heavyhanded approach of adopting the 1930s-era rules for regulating monopoly telephone companies on broadband services. According to the Open Internet Order, strict net neutrality rules prohibit blocking, throttling and paid prioritization. Similar to the reasoning in the EU, the Open Internet Order should enhance a virtuous circle where “innovations at the edges of the network enhance consumer demand, leading to expanded investments in broadband infrastructure that, in turn, spark new innovations at the edge.” In 2017, the Federal Communications Commission’s Restoring Internet Freedom Order reversed its 2015 decision. Since then the regulatory regime in the US differs fundamentally from the rather strict regulations imposed in the EU.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“欧美近期的网络中立政策”特刊
本期特刊精选了来自知名学者和政策专家的五篇文章,为ICT行业的学术界和政策制定者提供了欧盟和美国近期网络中立政策变化的经济影响概述。在过去20年里,这两个司法管辖区都实施了根本性的政策转变,决策过程漫长而有争议,大西洋两岸的政党关系都很密切。本期重点关注欧盟和美国网络中立政策制定的历史,特别强调最近的2015 - 2018年期间发生的重大政策变化:欧洲网络中立立法于2015年颁布。其目的是通过实施网络中立政策,禁止互联网接入服务提供商歧视性地使用网络管理实践(如阻止或限制合法内容),“保证互联网生态系统作为创新引擎的持续运作”。2015年,美国监管机构(联邦通信委员会,FCC)颁布了《2015年开放互联网令》,该机构采用了20世纪30年代的规则,对宽带服务的垄断电话公司进行了监管。根据《开放互联网秩序》,严格的网络中立规则禁止屏蔽、节流和付费优先。与欧盟的推理类似,开放互联网秩序应该加强一个良性循环,即“网络边缘的创新提高了消费者的需求,导致对宽带基础设施的投资扩大,进而激发边缘的新创新。”2017年,联邦通信委员会的《恢复互联网自由令》推翻了其2015年的决定。从那以后,美国的监管制度与欧盟相当严格的监管制度有着根本的不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Review of Network Economics seeks to help policy makers, academics, and practitioners keep informed of new research and policy debate in network economics and related subjects that are relevant to the study of network industries. By publishing high quality research on topical issues relevant to network industries, it is hoped readers will be able to gain a deeper understanding of the economic issues involved and that this will improve the quality of decision making by private and public organisations, and debate among researchers. The articles can cover specific network industries, or may deal with general issues that have relevance to a number of different network industries, including topics in the economics of networks, regulation, competition law, or industrial organisation. Papers that provide insights into policy debates are especially welcome, as are up-to-date surveys, book reviews, and comments.
期刊最新文献
Reform, Not Revolution, is What is Needed Now for Yardstick Competition The Quality of Interactions in Competition Between Social Media Platforms Mixed Bundling and Mergers Price-Cap Regulation of Firms That Supply Their Rivals A Signaling Theory of the Online Consumer Review Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1