Construction and validation of a cross-national scale of family modernism.

A. Inkeles, K. Miller
{"title":"Construction and validation of a cross-national scale of family modernism.","authors":"A. Inkeles, K. Miller","doi":"10.7312/inke91084-012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As one phase of its research on the social psychology of modernization the Project on Social and Cultural Aspects of Development undertook to construct and validate a cross-nationally applicable scale of family attitudes and behaviors measured on a traditional I modern dimension. The data consisted of 5$00 interviews with male workers in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), India, Israel, Nigeria, Argentina, and Chile. The main sample groups were drawn from among rural cultivators, urban nonindustrial workers, and factory workers, with a range within and across these sample groups of other socially relevant variables. Realms of family life included in the study were the role of the aged, aspirations for children, independence from parents, extended kin obligations, women''s rights, and family planning. Several family modernism scales incorporating these themes were constructed emphasizing several different criteria: theoretical relevance, maximum internal consistency (as measured by the Kuder-Richardson formula), and strict cross-national comparability. Al though we were able to construct scales fully meeting the first and third criteria, all of our scales attained only modest reliability. This result led us to the tentative conclusion, subject to further research, that the realm of family relations is much less internally consistent within and across cultures than other realms involved in modernization. Even given their modest internal consistency, however, our scales were validated in that they consistently correlated significantly and above. 10 with education, occupation, factory experience, urban-rural origin, and mass media exposure.","PeriodicalId":36670,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sociology of the Family","volume":"1 1","pages":"127-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1974-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sociology of the Family","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7312/inke91084-012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

As one phase of its research on the social psychology of modernization the Project on Social and Cultural Aspects of Development undertook to construct and validate a cross-nationally applicable scale of family attitudes and behaviors measured on a traditional I modern dimension. The data consisted of 5$00 interviews with male workers in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), India, Israel, Nigeria, Argentina, and Chile. The main sample groups were drawn from among rural cultivators, urban nonindustrial workers, and factory workers, with a range within and across these sample groups of other socially relevant variables. Realms of family life included in the study were the role of the aged, aspirations for children, independence from parents, extended kin obligations, women''s rights, and family planning. Several family modernism scales incorporating these themes were constructed emphasizing several different criteria: theoretical relevance, maximum internal consistency (as measured by the Kuder-Richardson formula), and strict cross-national comparability. Al though we were able to construct scales fully meeting the first and third criteria, all of our scales attained only modest reliability. This result led us to the tentative conclusion, subject to further research, that the realm of family relations is much less internally consistent within and across cultures than other realms involved in modernization. Even given their modest internal consistency, however, our scales were validated in that they consistently correlated significantly and above. 10 with education, occupation, factory experience, urban-rural origin, and mass media exposure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭现代主义跨国尺度的建构与验证。
作为其关于现代化的社会心理学研究的一个阶段,发展的社会和文化方面项目着手构建和验证一个跨国适用的家庭态度和行为量表,该量表是在传统和现代维度上测量的。这些数据包括对东巴基斯坦(现在的孟加拉国)、印度、以色列、尼日利亚、阿根廷和智利的男性工人进行5次价值500美元的访谈。主要样本群体来自农村农民、城市非工业工人和工厂工人,其他社会相关变量在这些样本群体内部和之间的范围。这项研究涉及的家庭生活领域包括老年人的角色、对孩子的期望、脱离父母的独立性、扩大的亲属义务、妇女的权利和计划生育。几个包含这些主题的家庭现代主义量表被构建,强调几个不同的标准:理论相关性,最大内部一致性(由库德-理查森公式衡量)和严格的跨国可比性。尽管我们能够构建完全符合第一和第三个标准的量表,但我们所有的量表都只有适度的可靠性。这一结果使我们得出了一个初步的结论,需要进一步的研究,即家庭关系领域在文化内部和跨文化的内部一致性远不如现代化所涉及的其他领域。然而,即使考虑到它们适度的内部一致性,我们的量表也得到了验证,因为它们始终显著相关。10 .学历、职业、工厂经验、城乡出身、媒体曝光。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Sociology of the Family
International Journal of Sociology of the Family Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORKS AND POPULATION AGEING IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN. MOTHER'S EMPLOYMENT DEMANDS, WORK-FAMILY CONFLICT, AND ADOLESCENT DEVELOPMENT. The effect of welfare on the family size of single female household heads. Lone-parent families in cross-cultural perspectives: ethnic and immigration issues. A cross-national analysis of family and household structure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1