Effects of Problem, Intervention, Evaluation (PIE) training on the Quality of Nursing Documentation Among Students of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

Q4 Social Sciences Strides in Development of Medical Education Pub Date : 2019-01-28 DOI:10.5812/SDME.65204
S. Almasi, F. Cheraghi, M. Dehghani, S. Ehsani, A. Khalili, N. Alimohammadi
{"title":"Effects of Problem, Intervention, Evaluation (PIE) training on the Quality of Nursing Documentation Among Students of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran","authors":"S. Almasi, F. Cheraghi, M. Dehghani, S. Ehsani, A. Khalili, N. Alimohammadi","doi":"10.5812/SDME.65204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Documentation of nursing care is one of the most important professional responsibilities of nurses and one of the major components of medical care and patient record documentation. Objectives: The present study was performed to determine the effect of problem, intervention, evaluation (PIE) training on the quality of nursing students’ documentation. Methods: In this semi-experimental single-group study with a pretest-posttest design, a total of 28 nursing students were selected by simple random sampling. The data collection tools included a demographic questionnaire, PIE documentation form, and documentation quality checklist. First, the students were asked to write two reports using the traditional or narrative method. Then, a training workshop was organized about PIE documentation, and the students were asked to use this method and write two more reports about the same patient on two consecutive days; overall, each student presented four reports. A total of 112 reports were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired t test in SPSS. Results: Basedontheresultsof paired t test,therewasasignificantdifferenceinthemeanscoreof documentationqualitybetween the pretest and posttest (P < 0.001). Also, there was a significant difference in the mean score of documentation quality between the pretest and posttest in terms of both report structure and content (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Useof PIEreportingsystemimprovesthequalityof nursingdocumentation. Therefore,itcanbeasuitablealternative for the current narrative or traditional method.","PeriodicalId":34340,"journal":{"name":"Strides in Development of Medical Education","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strides in Development of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/SDME.65204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Documentation of nursing care is one of the most important professional responsibilities of nurses and one of the major components of medical care and patient record documentation. Objectives: The present study was performed to determine the effect of problem, intervention, evaluation (PIE) training on the quality of nursing students’ documentation. Methods: In this semi-experimental single-group study with a pretest-posttest design, a total of 28 nursing students were selected by simple random sampling. The data collection tools included a demographic questionnaire, PIE documentation form, and documentation quality checklist. First, the students were asked to write two reports using the traditional or narrative method. Then, a training workshop was organized about PIE documentation, and the students were asked to use this method and write two more reports about the same patient on two consecutive days; overall, each student presented four reports. A total of 112 reports were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired t test in SPSS. Results: Basedontheresultsof paired t test,therewasasignificantdifferenceinthemeanscoreof documentationqualitybetween the pretest and posttest (P < 0.001). Also, there was a significant difference in the mean score of documentation quality between the pretest and posttest in terms of both report structure and content (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Useof PIEreportingsystemimprovesthequalityof nursingdocumentation. Therefore,itcanbeasuitablealternative for the current narrative or traditional method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
问题、干预、评价(PIE)培训对伊朗哈马丹医学院学生护理文献质量的影响
背景:护理记录是护士最重要的职业职责之一,也是医疗护理和病案记录的重要组成部分之一。目的:探讨问题、干预、评价(PIE)训练对护生档案质量的影响。方法:采用前测后测设计的半实验单组研究,采用简单随机抽样的方法抽取28名护生。数据收集工具包括人口统计问卷、PIE文档表单和文档质量检查表。首先,学生们被要求用传统的或叙述的方法写两篇报告。然后,组织了一个关于PIE文档的培训工作坊,要求学生使用这种方法连续两天多写两篇关于同一患者的报告;总的来说,每个学生提交了四份报告。采用SPSS统计软件描述性统计和配对t检验对112份报告进行分析。结果:配对t检验结果显示,前测和后测的文献质量均数差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。此外,在报告结构和内容方面,前测和后测的文献质量平均得分也有显著差异(P < 0.001)。结论:采用穿孔系统可提高护理文献的质量。因此,它可以成为当前叙事或传统方法的合适替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation of Consistency Between the Students’ Scores Using Bayesian Intraclass Correlation Coefficient in Postgraduate Students of Kerman University of Medical Sciences in 2013 - 2015 The Relationship of Happiness and Quality of Educational Services with Academic Burnout Among Students of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran A Study of Courses Related to Drug Abuse Prevention in Medical Sciences Curriculum in Iran Lack of Clinical Leadership Competency in Continuing Education Web-Based Learning in Internal Medicine: The First Step in Electronic Clinical Education of the Department of Internal Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1