Życie pęknięte w "Notatkach z Podziemia" Dostojewskiego

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia Pub Date : 2019-06-30 DOI:10.18778/1689-4286.45.04
Paweł Pieniążek
{"title":"Życie pęknięte w \"Notatkach z Podziemia\" Dostojewskiego","authors":"Paweł Pieniążek","doi":"10.18778/1689-4286.45.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The broken life in Dostoevsky’s Notes from the Underground This article is dedicated to a philosophical interpretation of Dostoevsky’s Notes from the Underground . In contrast to the existential interpretation proposed by Shestov (in Philosophy of tragedy ) the author defends the thesis that Dostoevsky’s novel has to be interpreted from the perspective of modernity, and the tragedy of his hero, the underground man, has to be interpreted in categories of alienation and inauthentic existence. From that perspective the divide between normal life and underground life expresses the fundamental contradiction of the modern world. The author indicates the proximity between Dostoevsky’s and Kierkegaard’s and Nietzsche’s analyses of modernity. He then shows that Dostoevsky contrasts the arbitrariness of the underground man to a deterministic, scientistic vision of the world and makes it an important premise of his understanding of an authentic existence based on freedom and faith.","PeriodicalId":30478,"journal":{"name":"HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.45.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The broken life in Dostoevsky’s Notes from the Underground This article is dedicated to a philosophical interpretation of Dostoevsky’s Notes from the Underground . In contrast to the existential interpretation proposed by Shestov (in Philosophy of tragedy ) the author defends the thesis that Dostoevsky’s novel has to be interpreted from the perspective of modernity, and the tragedy of his hero, the underground man, has to be interpreted in categories of alienation and inauthentic existence. From that perspective the divide between normal life and underground life expresses the fundamental contradiction of the modern world. The author indicates the proximity between Dostoevsky’s and Kierkegaard’s and Nietzsche’s analyses of modernity. He then shows that Dostoevsky contrasts the arbitrariness of the underground man to a deterministic, scientistic vision of the world and makes it an important premise of his understanding of an authentic existence based on freedom and faith.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文致力于对陀思妥耶夫斯基的《地下笔记》进行哲学解读。与舍斯托夫(《悲剧哲学》)提出的存在主义解释相反,作者主张陀思妥耶夫斯基的小说必须从现代性的角度来解释,他的主人公地下人的悲剧必须从异化和不真实的存在的范畴来解释。从这个角度来看,正常生活和地下生活之间的鸿沟表达了现代世界的根本矛盾。作者指出陀思妥耶夫斯基和克尔凯郭尔对现代性的分析与尼采的分析有相似之处。然后,他表明陀思妥耶夫斯基将地下人的随意性与决定论的、科学的世界观进行了对比,并将其作为他理解基于自由和信仰的真实存在的重要前提。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Teologiczne konsekwencje darwinizmu — „Bóg Darwina” Corneliusa G. Huntera Co to za świat? The Limits of Liberalism. Tradition, Individualism, and the crisis of freedom, Mark. T. Mitchell, University of Notre Dame Press, Indiana 2019, ss. 328 – Artykuł Recenzyjny Teoria interpretacji Paula Ricoeura i Hansa-Georga Gadamera. Analiza porównawcza Ideologia w edukacji. Spojrzenie opisowe, negatywne i pozytywne na przykładzie wybranych stanowisk pedagogiki katolickiej i krytycznej
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1