Theoretical explanation of Sovereignty and Statehood in Islam within the purview of Modern Time

A. Khan, Shaista Naznin, Rizwana Gul
{"title":"Theoretical explanation of Sovereignty and Statehood in Islam within the purview of Modern Time","authors":"A. Khan, Shaista Naznin, Rizwana Gul","doi":"10.26710/sbsee.v4i2.2268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The main theme of the present study was to provide previous empirical and other literature reviews of sovereignty and statehood in Islam and particularly its compression with modern times. \nApproach: Prior study on statehood was examined from various aspects. Findings: It has been releveled that Statehood and sovereignty is one of the important elements of an Islamic state in the modern world. Besides, in Islam, one of the greatest attributes of God is sovereignty. However, the western notion of sovereignty developed by declining God’s sovereignty is rejected on two grounds; the first slam lacks any historical evidence to grant ultimate power to any political authority or ruler. Second, the notion of sovereignty in a specific historical and present social European setting is an attempt to undermine the absolute authority of the church. Notwithstanding, there are three notions of Islamic sovereignty. \nImplications: The study concluded that in the Islamic State, sovereignty belongs to Allah and Allah is the only one who rules which is viewed in the form of divine laws and Jurisprudence. The interpretation of this rule of sovereignty as that there is no concept of people’s sovereignty in Islam is not correct because Allah cannot be an immediate ruler in the political connotation.    ","PeriodicalId":34116,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Business and Society in Emerging Economies","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Business and Society in Emerging Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26710/sbsee.v4i2.2268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The main theme of the present study was to provide previous empirical and other literature reviews of sovereignty and statehood in Islam and particularly its compression with modern times. Approach: Prior study on statehood was examined from various aspects. Findings: It has been releveled that Statehood and sovereignty is one of the important elements of an Islamic state in the modern world. Besides, in Islam, one of the greatest attributes of God is sovereignty. However, the western notion of sovereignty developed by declining God’s sovereignty is rejected on two grounds; the first slam lacks any historical evidence to grant ultimate power to any political authority or ruler. Second, the notion of sovereignty in a specific historical and present social European setting is an attempt to undermine the absolute authority of the church. Notwithstanding, there are three notions of Islamic sovereignty. Implications: The study concluded that in the Islamic State, sovereignty belongs to Allah and Allah is the only one who rules which is viewed in the form of divine laws and Jurisprudence. The interpretation of this rule of sovereignty as that there is no concept of people’s sovereignty in Islam is not correct because Allah cannot be an immediate ruler in the political connotation.    
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代视野下伊斯兰教主权与国家地位的理论阐释
目的:本研究的主要主题是提供伊斯兰主权和国家地位的以往经验和其他文献综述,特别是其与现代的压缩。方法:从多个方面考察前人对国家地位的研究。研究结果表明,国家地位和主权是现代世界伊斯兰国家的重要因素之一。此外,在伊斯兰教中,真主最伟大的属性之一就是主权。然而,西方的主权概念是通过否认上帝的主权而发展起来的,这一概念被拒绝的理由有两点;第一次猛击没有任何历史证据证明任何政治权威或统治者拥有最终权力。其次,主权概念在欧洲特定的历史和当前社会背景下是一种削弱教会绝对权威的尝试。尽管如此,伊斯兰的主权有三种概念。启示:该研究得出结论,在伊斯兰国,主权属于安拉,安拉是唯一的统治者,这被视为神圣的法律和法理学的形式。将这一主权规则解释为伊斯兰教中没有人民主权的概念是不正确的,因为安拉在政治内涵上不可能是一个直接的统治者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Strategic Direction and Firm Performance: Evidence from the SACCO Sector Intervening Role of Sustainability Practices in the Nexuses of Responsible Leadership and Environmental, Task, and Contextual Performance Information Technology Factors Impacting Educators before and during COVID-19: A Study of Developing Countries Impact of Relational Benefit on Customer Loyalty with the Mediating Role of Customer Satisfaction: A Study of Selective Banks of Pakistan Impression of COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Employees: Analyzing the Moderating Effect of Perceived Organizational Support
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1