COMPARISON OF TRIGGER POINT THERAPY AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL THERAPY IN TENSION TYPE HEADACHES

S. Aslam, Aqeel Ahmed, Sundas Zia, Noureen Farooq
{"title":"COMPARISON OF TRIGGER POINT THERAPY AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL THERAPY IN TENSION TYPE HEADACHES","authors":"S. Aslam, Aqeel Ahmed, Sundas Zia, Noureen Farooq","doi":"10.52567/trj.v3i01.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the effectiveness of trigger point release and conventional physical therapy in tension type headaches. Materials & Methods: Randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted from 18th February 2017 to 13 July 2018, at Isra institute of Rehabilitation Sciences (IIRS) Isra University, Islamabad Campus, Pakistan. A total of n=31 healthy individuals with tension type headache below the age of 50 years, were selected through non probability convenient sampling technique and randomly divided into conventional physical therapy and trigger point therapy group. The pain and Headache disability index data was compared at baseline and during and after the intervention while quality of life was measured pre and post the sessions. For within the groups changes RM-ANOVA was used and for between the groups differences independent sample t-test was used. Results: The results showed that pain was significantly reduced at the end of intervention in conventional physical therapy group as compare to trigger point therapy group (1.31±0.47 ver. 2.13±0.64, p<0.001). Regarding headache disability index, at the end of intervention trigger point therapy group show better results as compare to conventional physical therapy group (32.75±12.83 ver. 53.27±26.57, p=0.01). While comparing quality of life between the groups, no significant difference was observed after intervention. Conclusion: It was concluded that both conventional physical therapy and trigger point therapy are effective in the management of tension type headache. It decreased pain and disability caused by headache but no effect on quality of life due to shorter duration of study. Keywords: Tension type headache, trigger point therapy, stretching exercises.","PeriodicalId":90985,"journal":{"name":"The open rehabilitation journal","volume":"2005 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open rehabilitation journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52567/trj.v3i01.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of trigger point release and conventional physical therapy in tension type headaches. Materials & Methods: Randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted from 18th February 2017 to 13 July 2018, at Isra institute of Rehabilitation Sciences (IIRS) Isra University, Islamabad Campus, Pakistan. A total of n=31 healthy individuals with tension type headache below the age of 50 years, were selected through non probability convenient sampling technique and randomly divided into conventional physical therapy and trigger point therapy group. The pain and Headache disability index data was compared at baseline and during and after the intervention while quality of life was measured pre and post the sessions. For within the groups changes RM-ANOVA was used and for between the groups differences independent sample t-test was used. Results: The results showed that pain was significantly reduced at the end of intervention in conventional physical therapy group as compare to trigger point therapy group (1.31±0.47 ver. 2.13±0.64, p<0.001). Regarding headache disability index, at the end of intervention trigger point therapy group show better results as compare to conventional physical therapy group (32.75±12.83 ver. 53.27±26.57, p=0.01). While comparing quality of life between the groups, no significant difference was observed after intervention. Conclusion: It was concluded that both conventional physical therapy and trigger point therapy are effective in the management of tension type headache. It decreased pain and disability caused by headache but no effect on quality of life due to shorter duration of study. Keywords: Tension type headache, trigger point therapy, stretching exercises.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
触发点疗法与常规物理疗法治疗紧张性头痛的比较
目的:比较触发点释放法与常规物理疗法治疗紧张性头痛的疗效。材料与方法:随机对照试验(RCT)于2017年2月18日至2018年7月13日在巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡校区以色列大学康复科学研究所(IIRS)进行。采用非概率方便抽样方法,选取50岁以下健康的紧张性头痛患者31例,随机分为常规物理治疗组和触发点治疗组。在基线、干预期间和之后比较疼痛和头痛残疾指数数据,同时测量治疗前后的生活质量。对于组内变化使用RM-ANOVA,对于组间差异使用独立样本t检验。结果:常规物理治疗组与触发点治疗组相比,干预结束时疼痛明显减轻(1.31±0.47);2.13±0.64,p < 0.001)。干预结束时,触发点治疗组头痛失能指数优于常规物理治疗组(32.75±12.83)。53.27±26.57,p = 0.01)。在比较两组患者的生活质量时,干预后无明显差异。结论:常规物理疗法和触发点疗法均可有效治疗紧张性头痛。它减少了由头痛引起的疼痛和残疾,但由于研究时间较短,对生活质量没有影响。关键词:紧张性头痛,触发点疗法,伸展运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-acceptance of low vision aids (LVADs) among patients presented to eye OPD in Poly Clinic Hospital Islamabad Effects of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder symptoms in adults: A randomized controlled trial Empowering pelvic floor rehabilitation: Unveiling technological innovations in the pelvic floor muscle chair; insights and hurdles in the pakistani context Effects of task-oriented balance training with sensory integration in post stroke patients Cases of spinal cord injury: correlation among resilience, social support and psychological well-being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1