The Moderating Effect of Scheduling Autonomy on Smartphone Use and Stress Among Older Workers

IF 2.7 2区 经济学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Work Aging and Retirement Pub Date : 2022-07-19 DOI:10.1093/workar/waac017
Jenna A. Van Fossen, Nathan M. Baker, Elizabeth A. Mack, C. Chang, S. Cotten, Isabella Catalano
{"title":"The Moderating Effect of Scheduling Autonomy on Smartphone Use and Stress Among Older Workers","authors":"Jenna A. Van Fossen, Nathan M. Baker, Elizabeth A. Mack, C. Chang, S. Cotten, Isabella Catalano","doi":"10.1093/workar/waac017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Older adults’ smartphone use has been shown to be a double-edged sword, linked to health and social benefits but also creating vulnerabilities. Similarly, the use of smartphones and other information and communication technologies (ICTs) in organizations also affords workers advantages, such as increased flexibility, while exposing them to risks such as exhaustion and distress. This research examines older workers’ smartphone use and identifies a contextual characteristic that may buffer the negative implications of smartphone use for work purposes. Following the job demands–resources (JD-R) model, we hypothesized that older workers’ daily work-related smartphone use is positively related to their experienced stress and negatively related to their mood, and that these relationships would be attenuated by work scheduling autonomy. We conducted an experience sampling method (ESM) study with a sample of 38 workers (ages 50–64) who completed daily measures over 8 days, and tracked their smartphone use objectively using screenshots of time spent using various apps. Contrary to our expectations, smartphone use was not significantly related to stress or mood. There were significant cross-level interactions, such that smartphone use for work was negatively related to experienced stress and positively related to a positive mood for those with lower levels of scheduling autonomy. We interpret these findings and discuss the effects that technology use for work may have on older workers’ well-being through the lens of the JD-R model. Our results suggest that ICT use in the workplace combined with work scheduling autonomy may not be advantageous for workers’ well-being.","PeriodicalId":46486,"journal":{"name":"Work Aging and Retirement","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work Aging and Retirement","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waac017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Older adults’ smartphone use has been shown to be a double-edged sword, linked to health and social benefits but also creating vulnerabilities. Similarly, the use of smartphones and other information and communication technologies (ICTs) in organizations also affords workers advantages, such as increased flexibility, while exposing them to risks such as exhaustion and distress. This research examines older workers’ smartphone use and identifies a contextual characteristic that may buffer the negative implications of smartphone use for work purposes. Following the job demands–resources (JD-R) model, we hypothesized that older workers’ daily work-related smartphone use is positively related to their experienced stress and negatively related to their mood, and that these relationships would be attenuated by work scheduling autonomy. We conducted an experience sampling method (ESM) study with a sample of 38 workers (ages 50–64) who completed daily measures over 8 days, and tracked their smartphone use objectively using screenshots of time spent using various apps. Contrary to our expectations, smartphone use was not significantly related to stress or mood. There were significant cross-level interactions, such that smartphone use for work was negatively related to experienced stress and positively related to a positive mood for those with lower levels of scheduling autonomy. We interpret these findings and discuss the effects that technology use for work may have on older workers’ well-being through the lens of the JD-R model. Our results suggest that ICT use in the workplace combined with work scheduling autonomy may not be advantageous for workers’ well-being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调度自主性对老年员工智能手机使用和压力的调节作用
老年人使用智能手机已被证明是一把双刃剑,它与健康和社会福利有关,但也会造成脆弱性。同样,在组织中使用智能手机和其他信息通信技术(ict)也为员工提供了优势,例如增加了灵活性,同时也使他们面临疲惫和痛苦等风险。这项研究调查了老年员工的智能手机使用情况,并确定了一种背景特征,可以缓冲工作中使用智能手机的负面影响。根据工作需求-资源(JD-R)模型,我们假设老年员工每天使用与工作相关的智能手机与他们的经验压力呈正相关,与他们的情绪负相关,并且这些关系会被工作安排自主权减弱。我们对38名员工(年龄在50-64岁)进行了经验抽样法(ESM)研究,他们在8天内完成了每天的测量,并通过使用各种应用程序的时间截图客观地跟踪了他们的智能手机使用情况。与我们的预期相反,智能手机的使用与压力或情绪没有显著关系。有显著的跨层级互动,比如工作中使用智能手机与经历的压力呈负相关,而对于那些调度自主权水平较低的人来说,使用智能手机与积极情绪呈正相关。我们解释了这些发现,并通过JD-R模型讨论了技术在工作中的使用可能对老年员工的幸福感产生的影响。我们的研究结果表明,在工作场所使用信息通信技术与工作调度自主权相结合,可能不利于工人的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
21.60%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Empowering the Care of Older Adults Through the Use of Technology. Aging Workforce in the Context of Technological Advancements: Toward a Socio-Ecological Model Employment Effects of Incentivized Gradual Retirement Plans The Road to Retirement: A Life Course Perspective on Labor Market Trajectories and Retirement Behaviors Cognitive Health Disparities by Race and Ethnicity: The Role of Occupational Complexity and Occupational Status
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1