{"title":"Modeling and structural control of a building with holonomic constraints","authors":"C. Rengifo, Diego A. Bravo","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2022.2049072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this study, we propose to evaluate structural control systems in terms of mechanical impedance and the peak of energy stored by the structure. Our main hypothesis is that the higher the mechanical impedance, the lower the peak of energy reached by the structure. This peak is calculated as the maximum of the difference between the energy injected by the seism and the energy dissipated as heat by viscous dampers. To support our claim, we performed numerical simulations on a three-story planar building comprising 12 revolute and four prismatic joints. Instead of using a linear mass-spring-damper model, we simulated a set of nonlinear equations given by the Newton-Euler (NE) algorithm, which has been widely used in robotics, but rarely in structural control. For energy dissipation, we compared a proportional derivative (PD) with a computed torque control (CTC). Simulation results for the CTC indicate that when all parameters of the structure are perfectly known, the deviations of the revolute and prismatic joints with respect to their nominal values are close to zero. This feature leads to almost null energy dissipation, but also reduces the energy transferred by the seism to the structure.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2022.2049072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT In this study, we propose to evaluate structural control systems in terms of mechanical impedance and the peak of energy stored by the structure. Our main hypothesis is that the higher the mechanical impedance, the lower the peak of energy reached by the structure. This peak is calculated as the maximum of the difference between the energy injected by the seism and the energy dissipated as heat by viscous dampers. To support our claim, we performed numerical simulations on a three-story planar building comprising 12 revolute and four prismatic joints. Instead of using a linear mass-spring-damper model, we simulated a set of nonlinear equations given by the Newton-Euler (NE) algorithm, which has been widely used in robotics, but rarely in structural control. For energy dissipation, we compared a proportional derivative (PD) with a computed torque control (CTC). Simulation results for the CTC indicate that when all parameters of the structure are perfectly known, the deviations of the revolute and prismatic joints with respect to their nominal values are close to zero. This feature leads to almost null energy dissipation, but also reduces the energy transferred by the seism to the structure.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.