Cryptocurrency: Towards Regulating the Unruly Enigma of Fintech in Nigeria and South Africa

F. Ukwueze
{"title":"Cryptocurrency: Towards Regulating the Unruly Enigma of Fintech in Nigeria and South Africa","authors":"F. Ukwueze","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2021/v24i0a10743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most modern inventions of financial technology (FinTech) since after the global financial crisis of 2008 is the crypto or virtual currency/asset. Since the creation of the first cryptocurrency, the Bitcoin, in 2009, it is estimated that over five thousand variants of the Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have emerged. Virtual currencies have become widespread across the globe but their legal status and uses in various countries have remained uncertain. They have been variously classified as currencies, securities, properties, assets, commodities and tokens, and used as means of exchange but are not legally recognised as legal tender. In many jurisdictions their emergence was greeted with scepticism and express or tacit rejection by financial and securities markets regulators, but over time, owing to their increasing popularity, characteristics, positive and negative potentials, there has been a gradual shift towards their formal recognition and regulation. Regulatory authorities in many countries are now grappling with designing appropriate policy and regulatory framework for the crypto phenomenon. This paper interrogates the current legal status and efforts to regulate cryptocurrencies in two leading African nations, Nigeria and South Africa, and highlights the challenges of designing an appropriate regulatory framework for this enigmatic technology. The paper adopts the doctrinal legal research methodology, employing the descriptive, analytical, and comparative approaches. It follows a structured review and analysis of relevant extant legislation on currencies and securities in the countries to ascertain whether they cover cryptocurrencies. It then compares the current position of the law on the subject in the two countries. Bearing in mind that it may not be possible to totally ban dealing in cryptocurrencies, the paper concludes that regulation has become imperative. Drawing from the position on the subject in more developed nations, the United States of America (US) and the European Union (EU), this paper proposes a model of regulation of virtual currency not only for Nigeria and South Africa but also for other African countries.","PeriodicalId":13701,"journal":{"name":"International Corporate Finance eJournal","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Corporate Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2021/v24i0a10743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

One of the most modern inventions of financial technology (FinTech) since after the global financial crisis of 2008 is the crypto or virtual currency/asset. Since the creation of the first cryptocurrency, the Bitcoin, in 2009, it is estimated that over five thousand variants of the Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have emerged. Virtual currencies have become widespread across the globe but their legal status and uses in various countries have remained uncertain. They have been variously classified as currencies, securities, properties, assets, commodities and tokens, and used as means of exchange but are not legally recognised as legal tender. In many jurisdictions their emergence was greeted with scepticism and express or tacit rejection by financial and securities markets regulators, but over time, owing to their increasing popularity, characteristics, positive and negative potentials, there has been a gradual shift towards their formal recognition and regulation. Regulatory authorities in many countries are now grappling with designing appropriate policy and regulatory framework for the crypto phenomenon. This paper interrogates the current legal status and efforts to regulate cryptocurrencies in two leading African nations, Nigeria and South Africa, and highlights the challenges of designing an appropriate regulatory framework for this enigmatic technology. The paper adopts the doctrinal legal research methodology, employing the descriptive, analytical, and comparative approaches. It follows a structured review and analysis of relevant extant legislation on currencies and securities in the countries to ascertain whether they cover cryptocurrencies. It then compares the current position of the law on the subject in the two countries. Bearing in mind that it may not be possible to totally ban dealing in cryptocurrencies, the paper concludes that regulation has become imperative. Drawing from the position on the subject in more developed nations, the United States of America (US) and the European Union (EU), this paper proposes a model of regulation of virtual currency not only for Nigeria and South Africa but also for other African countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加密货币:对尼日利亚和南非金融科技难以驾驭之谜的监管
自2008年全球金融危机以来,金融技术(FinTech)最现代的发明之一是加密货币或虚拟货币/资产。自2009年第一种加密货币比特币诞生以来,据估计,比特币和其他加密货币已经出现了5000多种变体。虚拟货币已经在全球范围内广泛使用,但它们在各个国家的法律地位和用途仍然不确定。它们被不同地归类为货币、证券、财产、资产、商品和代币,并被用作交换手段,但在法律上不被视为法定货币。在许多司法管辖区,它们的出现受到金融和证券市场监管机构的怀疑和明示或默示的拒绝,但随着时间的推移,由于它们越来越受欢迎,特征,积极和消极的潜力,逐渐转向对它们的正式承认和监管。许多国家的监管机构正在努力为加密现象设计适当的政策和监管框架。本文探讨了尼日利亚和南非这两个主要非洲国家目前在监管加密货币方面的法律地位和努力,并强调了为这一神秘技术设计适当监管框架的挑战。本文采用理论法学研究方法,采用描述法、分析法和比较法。它遵循对各国现行货币和证券相关立法的结构化审查和分析,以确定它们是否涵盖加密货币。然后比较了两国在这一问题上的法律现状。考虑到完全禁止加密货币交易可能是不可能的,该论文得出的结论是,监管已变得势在必行。根据更发达国家,美利坚合众国(US)和欧盟(EU)在这一问题上的立场,本文提出了一种不仅适用于尼日利亚和南非,而且适用于其他非洲国家的虚拟货币监管模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Supply Chain Channel of Government Credit Pass-through Two Investors, Two Trees, Two Goods The Role of Exchange Rate in Monetary Policy Rules: A Welfare-Based Re-Examination Home–Host Distance in Governance Quality, Foreign Banks’ Lending, and Emerging Host Markets’ Resilience The ESG Home Bias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1