COVID-19 pneumonia as a risk factor for recurrent pneumothorax.

IF 7.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological Inquiry Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.7861/clinmed.Let.22.2.3
Oscar Jolobe
{"title":"COVID-19 pneumonia as a risk factor for recurrent pneumothorax.","authors":"Oscar Jolobe","doi":"10.7861/clinmed.Let.22.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48327,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Inquiry","volume":"9 1","pages":"188-189"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.Let.22.2.3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 肺炎是复发性气胸的危险因素。
在大流行期间,人们对关键工作者,特别是卫生保健工作者非常赞赏和同情。这方面的一个例子是,全国人民每周团结一致地站起来表达他们的感激之情。第二,选择性活动次数的减少和干预措施的减少意味着并发症的减少和投诉的减少。最后,当医疗保健专业人员被重新部署到他们的专业知识之外的角色时,GMC发布了关于何时应该转介他们是否适合实践的指导。由于沟通不畅,投诉开始下降,随后逐渐增加;暂停访问;院内COVID-19感染;由于疾病和隔离造成工作人员短缺,护理不足;经常在最后一刻取消程序;以及逐渐减弱的同情心。GMC的最新报告显示,三分之二(65%)的医生由于高工作量和倦怠而难以为患者提供足够的护理。一项涉及初级保健临床医生的调查显示,三分之二的人担心面临投诉,超过三分之一的人已经收到了与大流行有关的投诉。最常见的原因是等待时间增加、获得测试的延误、沟通不畅和在线咨询。除非我们找到处理这一流行病影响的有效办法,否则申诉很可能会继续增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Inquiry
Psychological Inquiry PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Psychological Inquiry serves as an international journal dedicated to the advancement of psychological theory. Each edition features an extensive target article exploring a controversial or provocative topic, accompanied by peer commentaries and a response from the target author(s). Proposals for target articles must be submitted using the Target Article Proposal Form, and only approved proposals undergo peer review by at least three reviewers. Authors are invited to submit their full articles after the proposal has received approval from the Editor.
期刊最新文献
How Prevalent is Social Projection? The Future of Social Perception Models: Further Directions for Theoretical Development of the Inductive Reasoning Model Social Projection and Cognitive Differentiation Co-Explain Self-Enhancement and in-Group Favoritism Three Pokes into the Comfort Zone of the Inductive Reasoning Model Inductive Reasoning Renewed: A Reply to Commentators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1