Using national surveys for mental health surveillance of individuals with intellectual disabilities in Canada.

I. Bielska, H. Ouellette-Kuntz, D. Hunter
{"title":"Using national surveys for mental health surveillance of individuals with intellectual disabilities in Canada.","authors":"I. Bielska, H. Ouellette-Kuntz, D. Hunter","doi":"10.24095/HPCDP.32.4.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nIndividuals with intellectual disabilities have a higher prevalence of health problems, including psychiatric and behavioural conditions, than the general population. However, there is little population-based information in Canada about individuals with a dual diagnosis of psychiatric disorder and intellectual impairment. The aim of this study was to determine whether the 2005 Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) and the 2006 Participation and Activity Limitation Survey (PALS) could be used to estimate the prevalence of dual diagnosis in Canada.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe undertook a secondary analysis of two population-based surveys to determine if these could be used to estimate the prevalence of psychiatric or behavioural conditions among adults with intellectual disabilities in Canada.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe surveys reflect prevalence estimates of intellectual disabilities (CCHS: 0.2% and PALS: 0.5%) that are considerably lower than those published in the literature. While it was possible to calculate the proportion of individuals with a dual diagnosis (CCHS: 30.6% and PALS: 44.3%), the surveys were of limited use for detailed analyses. The estimates of prevalence derived from the surveys, especially from the CCHS, were of unacceptable quality due to high sampling variability and selection bias.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe estimates should be interpreted with caution due to concerns regarding the representativeness of the sample with intellectual disabilities in the national surveys.","PeriodicalId":50696,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada","volume":"1 1","pages":"194-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24095/HPCDP.32.4.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Individuals with intellectual disabilities have a higher prevalence of health problems, including psychiatric and behavioural conditions, than the general population. However, there is little population-based information in Canada about individuals with a dual diagnosis of psychiatric disorder and intellectual impairment. The aim of this study was to determine whether the 2005 Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) and the 2006 Participation and Activity Limitation Survey (PALS) could be used to estimate the prevalence of dual diagnosis in Canada. METHODS We undertook a secondary analysis of two population-based surveys to determine if these could be used to estimate the prevalence of psychiatric or behavioural conditions among adults with intellectual disabilities in Canada. RESULTS The surveys reflect prevalence estimates of intellectual disabilities (CCHS: 0.2% and PALS: 0.5%) that are considerably lower than those published in the literature. While it was possible to calculate the proportion of individuals with a dual diagnosis (CCHS: 30.6% and PALS: 44.3%), the surveys were of limited use for detailed analyses. The estimates of prevalence derived from the surveys, especially from the CCHS, were of unacceptable quality due to high sampling variability and selection bias. CONCLUSION The estimates should be interpreted with caution due to concerns regarding the representativeness of the sample with intellectual disabilities in the national surveys.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在加拿大利用国家调查对智障人士进行心理健康监测。
智力残疾者的健康问题,包括精神和行为状况,比一般人群更为普遍。然而,在加拿大,关于精神障碍和智力障碍双重诊断的个体的基于人群的信息很少。本研究的目的是确定2005年加拿大社区健康调查(CCHS)和2006年参与和活动限制调查(PALS)是否可用于估计加拿大双重诊断的患病率。方法:我们对两项基于人群的调查进行了二次分析,以确定这些调查是否可用于估计加拿大智力残疾成人中精神或行为状况的患病率。结果调查反映的智力残疾患病率估计值(CCHS: 0.2%, PALS: 0.5%)明显低于文献中公布的数据。虽然有可能计算出双重诊断的个体比例(CCHS: 30.6%, PALS: 44.3%),但调查对详细分析的用途有限。来自调查的患病率估计,特别是来自CCHS的患病率估计,由于高抽样变异性和选择偏差,其质量是不可接受的。结论由于考虑到智力障碍样本在全国调查中的代表性,应谨慎解释这些估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada
Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Health inequalities associated with neighbourhood deprivation in the Quebec population with hypertension in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Active and safe transportation of elementary-school students: comparative analysis of the risks of injury associated with children travelling by car, walking and cycling between home and school. Developing injury indicators for First Nations and Inuit children and youth in Canada: a modified Delphi approach. Chronic disease and chronic disease risk factors among First Nations, Inuit and Métis populations of northern Canada. Multimorbidity disease clusters in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Caucasian populations in Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1