RU WARE POTTERY AND THE PRINCIPLES OF MINIMALISM: TO THE PROBLEM OF THE SENSE OF FORM

E. V. Vasil’eva, Y. Bu
{"title":"RU WARE POTTERY AND THE PRINCIPLES OF MINIMALISM: TO THE PROBLEM OF THE SENSE OF FORM","authors":"E. V. Vasil’eva, Y. Bu","doi":"10.17223/22220836/42/4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The comparison of various artistic phenomena, which are separated geographically and chronologically, is a complicated analytical precedent. The matching requires stable criteria, and a distance (spatial, temporal, cultural or artistic) makes the difficulties to the formulation of analytical principles. Different historical epochs form their own independent systems, which do not always imply the possibility of the direct comparison. At the same time, such juxtaposition gives possibility to identify common pictorial and ideological principles of artistic structures, which don’t have the strict identical forms. The comparison of separated artistic phenomena allows to determine the common platform of culture and to discover the integral principle of various artistic systems. This article is devoted to the comparing of two independent art systems. The Chinese Ru ware pottery of the Song dynasty and the international minimalism of the 1960s and 1980s are distanced one from another both territorially and chronologically. At the same time, they are close artistic systems, where the unifying factor is the idea and the sense of form. Within the framework of the article, the very possibility of comparing different artistic systems is considered. The text examines the possible criteria of such comparison. It raises the questions on the principles of the artistic relations. The starting point of the work is the specification of the basic characteristics for the Ru ware pottery and the determination of the basic principles of international minimalism of the 1960s and 1980s. The article examines the specific features and peculiarities of Ru ware pottery, which, despite its popularity, is not enough studied in the Russian analytical space. Besides, the text indicates the specific features of European and American minimalism. This direction also presents material for systematic study. One of the main tasks for this work is the presentation of key parameters related to the form elements of Ru ware pottery and the description of conceptual components related to the international minimalism. Comparing these two systems, authors refer to the basic categories of European theory of art, which appearance is associated with the names of Wilhelm Vorringer and Henry Welflin. The main criteria that allows to compare these artistic trends is «the sense of form» - the concept that was determined in German art-theory in the first half of the XXth century. The use of this categories and the discovery of the concept of the sense of form, allows to show a parallel between the principles of Ru ware pottery and the system of international minimalism of the second half of the XXth century.","PeriodicalId":41702,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Kulturologiya i Iskusstvovedenie-Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Kulturologiya i Iskusstvovedenie-Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/22220836/42/4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The comparison of various artistic phenomena, which are separated geographically and chronologically, is a complicated analytical precedent. The matching requires stable criteria, and a distance (spatial, temporal, cultural or artistic) makes the difficulties to the formulation of analytical principles. Different historical epochs form their own independent systems, which do not always imply the possibility of the direct comparison. At the same time, such juxtaposition gives possibility to identify common pictorial and ideological principles of artistic structures, which don’t have the strict identical forms. The comparison of separated artistic phenomena allows to determine the common platform of culture and to discover the integral principle of various artistic systems. This article is devoted to the comparing of two independent art systems. The Chinese Ru ware pottery of the Song dynasty and the international minimalism of the 1960s and 1980s are distanced one from another both territorially and chronologically. At the same time, they are close artistic systems, where the unifying factor is the idea and the sense of form. Within the framework of the article, the very possibility of comparing different artistic systems is considered. The text examines the possible criteria of such comparison. It raises the questions on the principles of the artistic relations. The starting point of the work is the specification of the basic characteristics for the Ru ware pottery and the determination of the basic principles of international minimalism of the 1960s and 1980s. The article examines the specific features and peculiarities of Ru ware pottery, which, despite its popularity, is not enough studied in the Russian analytical space. Besides, the text indicates the specific features of European and American minimalism. This direction also presents material for systematic study. One of the main tasks for this work is the presentation of key parameters related to the form elements of Ru ware pottery and the description of conceptual components related to the international minimalism. Comparing these two systems, authors refer to the basic categories of European theory of art, which appearance is associated with the names of Wilhelm Vorringer and Henry Welflin. The main criteria that allows to compare these artistic trends is «the sense of form» - the concept that was determined in German art-theory in the first half of the XXth century. The use of this categories and the discovery of the concept of the sense of form, allows to show a parallel between the principles of Ru ware pottery and the system of international minimalism of the second half of the XXth century.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如陶与极简主义原则:以形式感为问题
各种艺术现象的比较,在地理上和时间上是分开的,是一个复杂的分析先例。匹配需要稳定的标准,而距离(空间、时间、文化或艺术)给分析原则的制定带来了困难。不同的历史时代形成了自己独立的体系,这并不总是意味着直接比较的可能性。同时,这种并置也使我们有可能识别出艺术结构的共同的图像和思想原则,这些原则并没有严格的相同形式。通过对分离的艺术现象的比较,可以确定文化的共同平台,发现各种艺术系统的整体原理。本文致力于两种独立艺术体系的比较。中国宋代的汝陶器与20世纪60年代和80年代的国际极简主义在地域和年代上都是有距离的。同时,它们又是紧密的艺术系统,统一的因素是理念和形式感。在文章的框架内,考虑了比较不同艺术系统的可能性。本文探讨了这种比较的可能标准。它提出了关于艺术关系原则的问题。作品的出发点是对汝陶器的基本特征进行了规范,确定了上世纪六八十年代国际极简主义的基本原则。本文考察了汝陶器的具体特征和特点,尽管它很受欢迎,但在俄罗斯的分析空间中却没有足够的研究。此外,本文还指出了欧美极简主义的具体特点。这个方向也提供了系统研究的材料。这项工作的主要任务之一是呈现与汝陶器的形式元素相关的关键参数,并描述与国际极简主义相关的概念成分。比较这两种体系,作者参考了欧洲艺术理论的基本范畴,其外观与威廉·沃林格和亨利·韦夫林的名字有关。比较这些艺术趋势的主要标准是“形式感”——这是20世纪上半叶德国艺术理论中确定的概念。这种分类的使用和形式感概念的发现,可以显示出汝器陶器原则与20世纪下半叶国际极简主义体系之间的平行关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Color in the art of the traditional costume of the indigenous small nations of the tyumen north (on the example of the analysis of museum exhibits) Photography as part of the media culture Preparation and conduct of the first mongolian expedition G.N. Potanina (based on letters from 1874-1878) The gotokaku leaf horn in iconography of japanese mandalas of Muromachi and Edo periods Education as an event: event nature of the university corporativity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1