Comparison of Two Obturation Techniques on Adhesion and Proliferation of Human Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences Pub Date : 2022-09-27 DOI:10.15517/ijds.2022.52583
Febe C. Vázquez Vázquez, Lourdes Y. Avalos Piña, Alejandra Rodríguez Hidalgo, A. Pozos-Guillen, Patricia González‐Alva, M. Montero-Aguilar, D. Chavarría-Bolaños, Marco A. Álvarez Pérez
{"title":"Comparison of Two Obturation Techniques on Adhesion and Proliferation of Human Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts","authors":"Febe C. Vázquez Vázquez, Lourdes Y. Avalos Piña, Alejandra Rodríguez Hidalgo, A. Pozos-Guillen, Patricia González‐Alva, M. Montero-Aguilar, D. Chavarría-Bolaños, Marco A. Álvarez Pérez","doi":"10.15517/ijds.2022.52583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aimed to compare the adhesion and proliferation of human periodontal ligament fibroblasts (hPDL) in transverse sections of the teeth sealed with two different obturation techniques, BioRoot RCS/hydraulic obturation (HO) and AH-Plus/continuous-wave condensation (CWC). The techniques were tested using an in vitro model to simulate the interaction between periodontal tissues and the materials. The root canals were instrumented and sterilized. A total of 15 samples were obturated with BioRoot RCS/HO and 15 samples with AH-Plus/CWC. Then, roots were sectioned to obtain obturated teeth slices, and hPDL cells were seeded onto the root slices. The results were obtained at intervals of 4 and 24 h for cell adhesion; and at 3,7,14, and 21 days for cell proliferation. Empty cell culture plates were use as controls. The cell adhesion was increased at 4 and 24 h for both groups, with an increased response observed in the BioRoot RCS/HO group (p<0.05). The difference in cell proliferation was also found between experimental groups. After 14 days of culture, BioRoot RCS/HO group showed an increase response than control and AH-Plus/CWC groups (p<0.05), and after 21 days both groups behaved better than control group, with an increased response observed in the BioRoot RCS/HO group. This study demonstrated that both root canal sealers allow the attach and growth of periodontal ligament fibroblasts, with an increased biological response in the BioRoot RCS/HO group.","PeriodicalId":19450,"journal":{"name":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2022.52583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aimed to compare the adhesion and proliferation of human periodontal ligament fibroblasts (hPDL) in transverse sections of the teeth sealed with two different obturation techniques, BioRoot RCS/hydraulic obturation (HO) and AH-Plus/continuous-wave condensation (CWC). The techniques were tested using an in vitro model to simulate the interaction between periodontal tissues and the materials. The root canals were instrumented and sterilized. A total of 15 samples were obturated with BioRoot RCS/HO and 15 samples with AH-Plus/CWC. Then, roots were sectioned to obtain obturated teeth slices, and hPDL cells were seeded onto the root slices. The results were obtained at intervals of 4 and 24 h for cell adhesion; and at 3,7,14, and 21 days for cell proliferation. Empty cell culture plates were use as controls. The cell adhesion was increased at 4 and 24 h for both groups, with an increased response observed in the BioRoot RCS/HO group (p<0.05). The difference in cell proliferation was also found between experimental groups. After 14 days of culture, BioRoot RCS/HO group showed an increase response than control and AH-Plus/CWC groups (p<0.05), and after 21 days both groups behaved better than control group, with an increased response observed in the BioRoot RCS/HO group. This study demonstrated that both root canal sealers allow the attach and growth of periodontal ligament fibroblasts, with an increased biological response in the BioRoot RCS/HO group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种封闭技术对人牙周韧带成纤维细胞粘附和增殖的影响
本研究旨在比较BioRoot RCS/水力封闭(HO)和AH-Plus/连续波冷凝(CWC)两种不同封闭技术对牙周韧带成纤维细胞(hPDL)在牙横切面的粘附和增殖的影响。采用体外模型模拟牙周组织与材料之间的相互作用,对这些技术进行了测试。根管固定并消毒。共有15个样本用BioRoot RCS/HO封闭,15个样本用AH-Plus/CWC封闭。然后,根切片获得封闭牙片,将hPDL细胞接种到根片上。细胞粘附时间间隔为4、24 h;在3、7、14和21天进行细胞增殖。空细胞培养板作为对照。4、24 h时,两组细胞黏附均增强,且BioRoot RCS/HO组反应增强(p<0.05)。实验组之间的细胞增殖也存在差异。培养14 d后,BioRoot RCS/HO组的应答率显著高于对照组和AH-Plus/CWC组(p<0.05),培养21 d后,两组均优于对照组,其中BioRoot RCS/HO组应答率显著高于对照组。本研究表明,两种根管密封剂都能促进牙周韧带成纤维细胞的附着和生长,BioRoot RCS/HO组的生物反应增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cephalometric Evaluation of the Relationship Between Cervical Vertebral Morphology and Anomalies and the Cranial Base Angle in Different Facial Types and Skeletal Classes Artificial Intelligence in Costa Rican Education Whitening Toothpastes Effect on Enamel Surface Morphology, Chemical Profile and Color: An In Vitro Study Salivary Cytokine Profile in Patients with Oral Lichen Planus Prevalence of Lesions and Oral Mucosal Normal Variations in an Elderly Population in Costa Rica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1