Changes in physiological and morphological traits of roots and shoots of wheat in response to different depths of waterlogging

A. Malik, T. Colmer, H. Lambers, M. Schortemeyer
{"title":"Changes in physiological and morphological traits of roots and shoots of wheat in response to different depths of waterlogging","authors":"A. Malik, T. Colmer, H. Lambers, M. Schortemeyer","doi":"10.1071/PP01089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growth reduction of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) during and after waterlogging stress depends on the depth of water from the soil surface. In a pot experiment with 3-week-old plants, soil was waterlogged for 14 d at the surface, or at 100 or 200 mm below the surface, and pots were then drained to assess recovery. A fully drained treatment kept at field capacity served as control. During waterlogging, the relative growth rate of roots decreased more than that of shoots (by 6-27% for shoots, by 15-74% for roots), and plant growth was reduced proportionally as the water level was increased. Light-saturated net photosynthesis was reduced by 70-80% for the two most severe waterlogging treatments, but was little affected for plants in soil waterlogged at 200 mm below the surface. The number of adventitious roots formed per stem in plants grown in waterlogged soil increased up to 1.5 times, but the number of tillers per plant was reduced by 24-62%. The adventitious roots only penetrated 85-116 mm below the water level in all waterlogging treatments. Adventitious root porosity was enhanced up to 10-fold for plants grown in waterlogged soil, depending on water level and position along the roots. Porosity also increased in basal zones of roots above the water level when the younger tissues had penetrated the waterlogged zone. Fourteen days after draining the pots, growth rates of plants where the soil had been waterlogged at 200 mm below the surface had recovered, while those of plants in the more severely waterlogged treatments had only partially recovered. These findings show that the depth of waterlogging has a large impact on the response of wheat both during and after a waterlogging event so that assessment of recovery is essential in evaluating waterlogging tolerance in crops.","PeriodicalId":8650,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Plant Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"185","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Plant Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PP01089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 185

Abstract

The growth reduction of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) during and after waterlogging stress depends on the depth of water from the soil surface. In a pot experiment with 3-week-old plants, soil was waterlogged for 14 d at the surface, or at 100 or 200 mm below the surface, and pots were then drained to assess recovery. A fully drained treatment kept at field capacity served as control. During waterlogging, the relative growth rate of roots decreased more than that of shoots (by 6-27% for shoots, by 15-74% for roots), and plant growth was reduced proportionally as the water level was increased. Light-saturated net photosynthesis was reduced by 70-80% for the two most severe waterlogging treatments, but was little affected for plants in soil waterlogged at 200 mm below the surface. The number of adventitious roots formed per stem in plants grown in waterlogged soil increased up to 1.5 times, but the number of tillers per plant was reduced by 24-62%. The adventitious roots only penetrated 85-116 mm below the water level in all waterlogging treatments. Adventitious root porosity was enhanced up to 10-fold for plants grown in waterlogged soil, depending on water level and position along the roots. Porosity also increased in basal zones of roots above the water level when the younger tissues had penetrated the waterlogged zone. Fourteen days after draining the pots, growth rates of plants where the soil had been waterlogged at 200 mm below the surface had recovered, while those of plants in the more severely waterlogged treatments had only partially recovered. These findings show that the depth of waterlogging has a large impact on the response of wheat both during and after a waterlogging event so that assessment of recovery is essential in evaluating waterlogging tolerance in crops.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小麦根、芽生理形态特征对不同涝渍深度的响应
涝渍胁迫期间和涝渍胁迫后小麦的生长减少程度取决于土壤表层水分的深度。在盆栽试验中,对生长3周的植株,在地表或地表以下100或200毫米处浸水14 d,然后排干盆栽以评估恢复情况。完全排水处理保持在现场容量作为对照。涝渍期间,根系相对生长率下降幅度大于枝条(枝条下降6-27%,根系下降15-74%),植株生长随水位升高成比例下降。两个最严重涝渍处理的光饱和净光合作用降低了70-80%,但对地表以下200 mm土壤涝渍的植物影响不大。在淹水土壤中生长的植株每茎形成的不定根数增加了1.5倍,但每株分蘖数减少了24-62%。在所有涝渍处理中,不定根仅在水位以下85 ~ 116 mm处生根。在浸水土壤中生长的植物不定根孔隙率提高了10倍,这取决于水位和根系的位置。当较年轻的组织穿透涝渍区后,高于水平面的根系基部孔隙度也增加。排水14天后,在地表以下200毫米的土壤中浸水的植物的生长速度恢复了,而在更严重的浸水处理中,植物的生长速度只恢复了部分。这些结果表明,涝渍深度对小麦在涝渍期间和涝渍后的响应有很大影响,因此对作物抗涝能力的评估是评价作物抗涝能力的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Different leaf surface characteristics of three grape cultivars affect leaf optical properties as measured with fibre optics: possible implication in stress tolerance Enhanced shoot regeneration in nine Australian wheat cultivars by spermidine and water stress treatments Effects of manipulation of pyruvate decarboxylase and alcohol dehydrogenase levels on the submergence tolerance of rice Plant water use efficiency of 17 Australian NAD-ME and NADP-ME C₄ grasses at ambient and elevated CO₂ partial pressure Localisation and expression of zeaxanthin epoxidase mRNA in Arabidopsis in response to drought stress and during seed development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1