Informative Role of Recommender Systems in Electronic Marketplaces: A Boon or a Bane for Competing Sellers

MIS Q. Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2020/14614
Lusi Li, Jianqing Chen, Srinivasan Raghunathan
{"title":"Informative Role of Recommender Systems in Electronic Marketplaces: A Boon or a Bane for Competing Sellers","authors":"Lusi Li, Jianqing Chen, Srinivasan Raghunathan","doi":"10.25300/MISQ/2020/14614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recommender systems have become the cornerstone of electronic marketplaces that sell products from competing sellers. Similar to traditional advertising, recommender systems can introduce consumers to new products and increase the market size which benefits sellers. This informative role of recommender systems in electronic marketplaces seems attractive to sellers because sellers do not pay the marketplaces for receiving recommendations. We show that in a marketplace that deploys a recommender system helping consumers discover the product that provides them the highest expected net utility, sellers do not necessarily benefit from the “free” exposure provided by the recommender system. The impacts of the recommender system are the result of a subtle interaction between advertising effect and competition effect. The advertising effect causes sellers to advertise less on their own and the competition effect causes them to decrease prices in the presence of a recommender system. Essentially, sellers “pay” in the form of more intense price competition because of the recommender system. Furthermore, the competition effect is exacerbated by the advertising effect because the recommender system alters a seller’s own strategies related to advertising intensity and price from being strategic substitutes in the absence of the recommender system to being strategic complements in its presence. As a result of these two effects, we find that sellers are more likely to benefit from the recommender system only when it has a high precision. The results do not change qualitatively whether sellers use targeted advertising or uniform advertising. However, we find that a recommender system that benefits sellers when they do not employ targeted advertising may actually hurt them when they adopt targeted advertising with a high precision. On the other hand, in the presence of the recommender system, an increase in sellers’ targeting precision beyond a threshold softens price competition, increases seller profits, and reduces consumer surplus. Finally, we find that when the recommender system assigns a larger weight to product fit than price, the adverse impacts of the recommender system on sellers are mitigated, thereby expanding the region in the parameter space where the recommender system is beneficial to sellers.","PeriodicalId":18743,"journal":{"name":"MIS Q.","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MIS Q.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Recommender systems have become the cornerstone of electronic marketplaces that sell products from competing sellers. Similar to traditional advertising, recommender systems can introduce consumers to new products and increase the market size which benefits sellers. This informative role of recommender systems in electronic marketplaces seems attractive to sellers because sellers do not pay the marketplaces for receiving recommendations. We show that in a marketplace that deploys a recommender system helping consumers discover the product that provides them the highest expected net utility, sellers do not necessarily benefit from the “free” exposure provided by the recommender system. The impacts of the recommender system are the result of a subtle interaction between advertising effect and competition effect. The advertising effect causes sellers to advertise less on their own and the competition effect causes them to decrease prices in the presence of a recommender system. Essentially, sellers “pay” in the form of more intense price competition because of the recommender system. Furthermore, the competition effect is exacerbated by the advertising effect because the recommender system alters a seller’s own strategies related to advertising intensity and price from being strategic substitutes in the absence of the recommender system to being strategic complements in its presence. As a result of these two effects, we find that sellers are more likely to benefit from the recommender system only when it has a high precision. The results do not change qualitatively whether sellers use targeted advertising or uniform advertising. However, we find that a recommender system that benefits sellers when they do not employ targeted advertising may actually hurt them when they adopt targeted advertising with a high precision. On the other hand, in the presence of the recommender system, an increase in sellers’ targeting precision beyond a threshold softens price competition, increases seller profits, and reduces consumer surplus. Finally, we find that when the recommender system assigns a larger weight to product fit than price, the adverse impacts of the recommender system on sellers are mitigated, thereby expanding the region in the parameter space where the recommender system is beneficial to sellers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子市场中推荐系统的信息作用:竞争卖家的福还是祸
推荐系统已经成为电子市场的基石,销售来自竞争卖家的产品。与传统广告类似,推荐系统可以向消费者介绍新产品,扩大市场规模,这对卖家有利。电子市场中推荐系统的这种信息作用似乎对卖家很有吸引力,因为卖家不需要为接受推荐而向市场付费。我们表明,在一个部署了推荐系统的市场中,帮助消费者发现为他们提供最高预期净效用的产品,卖家不一定会从推荐系统提供的“免费”曝光中受益。推荐系统的影响是广告效应和竞争效应微妙互动的结果。广告效应导致卖家减少自己的广告宣传,竞争效应导致他们在有推荐系统的情况下降低价格。从本质上讲,由于推荐系统,卖家以更激烈的价格竞争的形式“支付”。此外,广告效应加剧了竞争效应,因为推荐系统改变了卖家自身的广告强度和价格策略,从没有推荐系统时的战略替代变成了有推荐系统时的战略补充。由于这两种影响,我们发现只有当推荐系统具有较高的精度时,卖家才更有可能从推荐系统中受益。无论卖家使用定向广告还是统一广告,结果都不会发生质的变化。然而,我们发现,当卖家不采用定向广告时,推荐系统会对卖家有利,而当卖家采用高精度的定向广告时,推荐系统可能会对卖家不利。另一方面,在推荐系统存在的情况下,卖家的定位精度提高到阈值以上,会软化价格竞争,增加卖家利润,减少消费者剩余。最后,我们发现当推荐系统赋予产品适合度比价格更大的权重时,推荐系统对卖家的不利影响被减轻,从而扩大了推荐系统在参数空间中对卖家有利的区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unintended Emotional Effects of Online Health Communities: A Text Mining-Supported Empirical Study Understanding the Digital Resilience of Physicians during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study Putting Religious Bias in Context: How Offline and Online Contexts Shape Religious Bias in Online Prosocial Lending Exploiting Expert Knowledge for Assigning Firms to Industries: A Novel Deep Learning Method Attaining Individual Creativity and Performance in Multidisciplinary and Geographically Distributed IT Project Teams: The Role of Transactive Memory Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1