{"title":"Theoretical study on the hydrogen bond interaction of 1:1 supermolecular complexes of protonated adrenaline with formate anion and its derivatives","authors":"Zhangyu Yu , Tao Liu , Dongju Zhang , Chengbu Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.theochem.2010.08.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The hydrogen bond (H-bond) interaction of 1:1 supermolecular complexes of protonated adrenaline (PAd<sup>+</sup>) with formate anion and its derivatives (denoted as RCOO<sup>−</sup>, R<img>H, CH<sub>3</sub>, CH<sub>2</sub>F, CH<sub>2</sub>Cl, and CH<sub>2</sub>Br) has been investigated by performing density functional theory calculations at the B3LYP/6-31G+(d) level. We obtained the most stable three conformations for each complex, which are denoted as PAd<sup>+</sup>–RCOO<sup>−</sup>(I), PAd<sup>+</sup>–RCOO<sup>−</sup>(II), PAd<sup>+</sup>–RCOO<sup>−</sup>(III), respectively, and calculated the interaction energy between PAd<sup>+</sup> and RCOO<sup>−</sup>. In all PAd<sup>+</sup>–RCOO<sup>−</sup> complexes, PAd<sup>+</sup>–CH<sub>3</sub>COO<sup>−</sup> is found to be the most favorable energetically. There exists low-barrier hydrogen bond (LBHB) in PAd<sup>+</sup>–HCOO<sup>−</sup>(III), PAd<sup>+</sup>–CH<sub>2</sub>FCOO<sup>−</sup>(III), PAd<sup>+</sup>–CH<sub>2</sub>ClCOO<sup>−</sup>(III), and PAd<sup>+</sup>–CH<sub>2</sub>Br<sup>−</sup>(III) complexes. The solvent effects on the geometry and energy of the complexes are also considered by using the polarizable continuum model (PCM) model in aqueous solvent. It is found that PAd<sup>+</sup>–R<sup>−</sup> complexes in solution are significantly less stable than those in the gas-phase. The theoretical results for the present model systems will be useful for experimental researchers working in this field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16419,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Structure-theochem","volume":"960 1","pages":"Pages 10-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.theochem.2010.08.017","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Structure-theochem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166128010005373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The hydrogen bond (H-bond) interaction of 1:1 supermolecular complexes of protonated adrenaline (PAd+) with formate anion and its derivatives (denoted as RCOO−, RH, CH3, CH2F, CH2Cl, and CH2Br) has been investigated by performing density functional theory calculations at the B3LYP/6-31G+(d) level. We obtained the most stable three conformations for each complex, which are denoted as PAd+–RCOO−(I), PAd+–RCOO−(II), PAd+–RCOO−(III), respectively, and calculated the interaction energy between PAd+ and RCOO−. In all PAd+–RCOO− complexes, PAd+–CH3COO− is found to be the most favorable energetically. There exists low-barrier hydrogen bond (LBHB) in PAd+–HCOO−(III), PAd+–CH2FCOO−(III), PAd+–CH2ClCOO−(III), and PAd+–CH2Br−(III) complexes. The solvent effects on the geometry and energy of the complexes are also considered by using the polarizable continuum model (PCM) model in aqueous solvent. It is found that PAd+–R− complexes in solution are significantly less stable than those in the gas-phase. The theoretical results for the present model systems will be useful for experimental researchers working in this field.