Applicability and accuracy of Bacterial Meningitis Score in a resource-limited hospital setting in Thailand

Wassana Pattarawanich , Rachanee Saksawad , Montida Veeravigrom
{"title":"Applicability and accuracy of Bacterial Meningitis Score in a resource-limited hospital setting in Thailand","authors":"Wassana Pattarawanich ,&nbsp;Rachanee Saksawad ,&nbsp;Montida Veeravigrom","doi":"10.1016/j.pid.2016.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Several studies have determined that Bacterial Meningitis<span> Score (BMS) has a high sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing bacterial meningitis from aseptic meningitis<span>. Thus, the authors conducted a cross-sectional study in 252 children with clinical suspected meningitis in the Hatyai Hospital located in the Southern part of Thailand. In this study, BMS has 100% sensitivity (95%CI; 0.799–1) and 62.1% specificity (95%CI; 0.554–0.682). Positive predictive value (PPV) was 18.5% (95%CI; 0.119–0.273) and negative predictive value (NPV) was 100% (95%CI; 0.967–1). BMS is a useful screening tool for early diagnosis of bacterial meningitis before cerebrospinal fluid culture<span> result is known, especially when latex agglutination is not available. BMS is not recommended as a diagnostic confirmation tool because of its low specificity.</span></span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":19984,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Infectious Disease","volume":"8 4","pages":"Pages 130-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pid.2016.07.005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212832816300443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several studies have determined that Bacterial Meningitis Score (BMS) has a high sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing bacterial meningitis from aseptic meningitis. Thus, the authors conducted a cross-sectional study in 252 children with clinical suspected meningitis in the Hatyai Hospital located in the Southern part of Thailand. In this study, BMS has 100% sensitivity (95%CI; 0.799–1) and 62.1% specificity (95%CI; 0.554–0.682). Positive predictive value (PPV) was 18.5% (95%CI; 0.119–0.273) and negative predictive value (NPV) was 100% (95%CI; 0.967–1). BMS is a useful screening tool for early diagnosis of bacterial meningitis before cerebrospinal fluid culture result is known, especially when latex agglutination is not available. BMS is not recommended as a diagnostic confirmation tool because of its low specificity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
细菌性脑膜炎评分在泰国一家资源有限的医院的适用性和准确性
一些研究已经确定细菌性脑膜炎评分(BMS)在区分细菌性脑膜炎和无菌性脑膜炎方面具有很高的敏感性和特异性。因此,作者在位于泰国南部的Hatyai医院对252名临床疑似脑膜炎的儿童进行了横断面研究。在本研究中,BMS具有100%的敏感性(95%CI;0.799-1)和62.1%的特异性(95%CI;0.554 - -0.682)。阳性预测值(PPV)为18.5% (95%CI;0.119 ~ 0.273),阴性预测值(NPV)为100% (95%CI;0.967 - 1)。在脑脊液培养结果已知之前,BMS是一种有用的早期诊断细菌性脑膜炎的筛查工具,特别是在胶乳凝集不可用的情况下。由于BMS的特异性较低,不推荐作为诊断确认工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Resurgence of Mumps among Lower Socioeconomic Class of Children in Ahmedabad: A Cross-sectional Study of 115 Cases in a Tertiary Care Center C-Tb Skin Test: A Step Toward Tuberculosis Eradication Similarities and Differences between Coronavirus Disease 2019-related Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children and Kawasaki Disease in Indian Patients Molecular Tools for Diagnosis of Pediatric Infectious Diseases Nonimmune Hydrops Fetalis and Early Skeletal Changes in Congenital Syphilis: Case Series and Review of Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1