Reassessing the health impacts of trade and investment agreements: a systematic review of quantitative studies, 2016-20.

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Interfaces Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00047-X
Pepita Barlow, Rujuta Sanap, Amandine Garde, L Alan Winters, Mzwandile A Mabhala, Anne-Marie Thow
{"title":"Reassessing the health impacts of trade and investment agreements: a systematic review of quantitative studies, 2016-20.","authors":"Pepita Barlow, Rujuta Sanap, Amandine Garde, L Alan Winters, Mzwandile A Mabhala, Anne-Marie Thow","doi":"10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00047-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To ensure a high level of health protection, governments must ensure that health and trade policy objectives are aligned. We conducted a systematic review of the health impacts of trade policies, including trade and investment agreements (TIAs), to provide a timely overview of this field. We systematically reviewed studies evaluating the health impacts of trade policies published between Jan 19, 2016, and July 10, 2020. Included studies were quantitative studies evaluating the impact of TIAs and trade policies on health determinants or outcomes. We evaluated methodological quality and performed a narrative synthesis. 21 of 28 067 articles identified via searches met our criteria. Methodologically strong studies found reduced child mortality, deteriorating worker health, rising supplies of sugar, ultra-processed food, tobacco, and alcohol supplies, and increased drug overdoses following trade reforms, compared with the time periods before trade reform. However, associations varied substantially across contexts and socioeconomic characteristics. Our findings show that trade policies, including TIAs, have diverse effects on health and health determinants. These effects vary substantially across contexts and socioeconomic groups. Governments seeking to adopt healthy trade policies should consider these updated findings to ensure that opportunities for health improvement are leveraged and widely shared, while harms are avoided, especially among vulnerable groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":50353,"journal":{"name":"Interfaces","volume":"39 1","pages":"e431-e438"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00047-X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To ensure a high level of health protection, governments must ensure that health and trade policy objectives are aligned. We conducted a systematic review of the health impacts of trade policies, including trade and investment agreements (TIAs), to provide a timely overview of this field. We systematically reviewed studies evaluating the health impacts of trade policies published between Jan 19, 2016, and July 10, 2020. Included studies were quantitative studies evaluating the impact of TIAs and trade policies on health determinants or outcomes. We evaluated methodological quality and performed a narrative synthesis. 21 of 28 067 articles identified via searches met our criteria. Methodologically strong studies found reduced child mortality, deteriorating worker health, rising supplies of sugar, ultra-processed food, tobacco, and alcohol supplies, and increased drug overdoses following trade reforms, compared with the time periods before trade reform. However, associations varied substantially across contexts and socioeconomic characteristics. Our findings show that trade policies, including TIAs, have diverse effects on health and health determinants. These effects vary substantially across contexts and socioeconomic groups. Governments seeking to adopt healthy trade policies should consider these updated findings to ensure that opportunities for health improvement are leveraged and widely shared, while harms are avoided, especially among vulnerable groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新评估贸易和投资协定对健康的影响:2016-20 年定量研究系统回顾。
为确保高水平的健康保护,各国政府必须确保健康与贸易政策目标保持一致。我们对贸易政策(包括贸易和投资协定(TIAs))对健康的影响进行了系统综述,以便及时了解这一领域的情况。我们系统地回顾了 2016 年 1 月 19 日至 2020 年 7 月 10 日期间发表的评估贸易政策对健康影响的研究。纳入的研究均为定量研究,评估了贸易投资协定和贸易政策对健康决定因素或结果的影响。我们对研究方法的质量进行了评估,并进行了叙述性综合。通过检索确定的 28 067 篇文章中有 21 篇符合我们的标准。方法可靠的研究发现,与贸易改革前相比,贸易改革后儿童死亡率降低,工人健康状况恶化,糖、超加工食品、烟草和酒精供应量增加,吸毒过量人数增加。然而,在不同的环境和社会经济特征下,相关性有很大差异。我们的研究结果表明,包括贸易协定在内的贸易政策对健康和健康决定因素有多种影响。这些影响因环境和社会经济群体的不同而大相径庭。寻求采取健康贸易政策的各国政府应考虑这些最新研究结果,以确保利用并广泛分享改善健康的机会,同时避免危害,尤其是对弱势群体的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interfaces
Interfaces 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 months
期刊介绍: The mission of INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics (IJAA) is to publish manuscripts focusing on the practice of operations research (OR) and management science (MS) and the impact this practice has on organizations throughout the world. The most appropriate papers are descriptions of the practice and implementation of OR/MS in commerce, industry, government, or education. The journal publishes papers in all areas of OR/MS including operations management, information systems, finance, marketing, education, quality, and strategy.
期刊最新文献
Individual patterns of functional connectivity in neonates as revealed by surface-based Bayesian modeling. The Sarcophagus and the City: Reflections on Chernobyl and the Dystopian Imagination Ruines et paysages bruts. Sur l’art involontaire Le “corps du poème”. Pour une approche phénoménologique des liens entre poème et expression corporelle dans le bharatanatyam, style de danse traditionnelle de l’Inde du Sud A tour of Nancy Holt’s ruins: from entropic monuments to system works
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1