Activity in post-pyrogenic soils in the Utrish State Nature Reserve (Russia) in the early succession stages

IF 1.2 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Nature Conservation Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.24189/ncr.2023.019
V. Vilkova, K. Kazeev, Dariya A. Privizentseva, M. Nizhelsky, S. Kolesnikov
{"title":"Activity in post-pyrogenic soils in the Utrish State Nature Reserve (Russia) in the early succession stages","authors":"V. Vilkova, K. Kazeev, Dariya A. Privizentseva, M. Nizhelsky, S. Kolesnikov","doi":"10.24189/ncr.2023.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the increasing frequency of fires, the study of the influence of the pyrogenic factor on the state of forest ecosystems is becoming an increasingly relevant research topic for scientists around the world. Of particular interest in the study is not only the direct wildfire impact, but also its indirect influence, which manifests itself in the early stages of succession. The study has been conducted in the Utrish State Nature Reserve, located on the Abrau Peninsula, northwestern part of the Black Sea coast of the Western Caucasus. The area of the State Nature Reserve «Utrish» is similar to the territory of the entire zone of the Mediterranean climate. The wildfire of 2020 has destroyed 4800 trees, and considerably changed biological properties of brown soils that led to a violation of their ecological functions. Changes in soil properties in the first few years after the wildfire impact are studied insufficiently compared to long-term changes. This study was aimed to investigate the activity of soil enzymes from the oxidase and hydrolase classes in the Utrish State Nature Reserve, immediately after the fire impact (2020), one year later (2021), and two years later (2022). During the field surveys, nine monitoring plots were established, i.e. three plots on each site under weak, medium, and strong degrees of the fire-induced damage. During the study, 81 soil samples were collected, i.e. three soil samples from each monitoring plot. Such enzymes as catalase, peroxidase, invertase, urease, and phosphatase were investigated. To assess the ecological condition of soils, we calculated the Integral Indicator of Biological State (IIBS), and determined the content of organic carbon. The results obtained were compared with the control values, typical for the background area of the forest. A correlation and factor analysis have been carried out. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to assess the reliability of the data obtained. The enzyme response depends on the type of enzyme and the degree of fire-induced damage. Immediately after the fire impact (2020), a significant decrease (by 53% in average) in catalase, urease, and invertase activity was found on the sites under weak, medium, and strong degrees of damage. Phosphatase activity did not change significantly, while peroxidase activity increased on average by 47%. In 2020, the ecological condition of soils was determined as unfavourable, with the IIBS equal to 82–90%. The activity of catalase, invertase, urease, and phosphatase increased by an average of 31% for soils with a weak degree of fire-induced damage. In 2021, a decrease in activity of the studied enzymes was noted in post-pyrogenic soils under medium and strong damage degree, but to a lesser extent than in 2020. The activity of catalase and urease decreased for all investigated impacts by 47%. The activity of peroxidase and phosphatase was higher in relation to the control values by 55%. For the weak degree of fire-induced damage, a decrease in phosphatase activity by 16% was found. In 2022 (two years after the fire impact), the ecological condition of soils was still recognised as unfavourable, with the IIBS decreased to 89%. However, it was demonstrated that the activity of enzymes from the class of hydrolases two years after the fire impact was closer to the control values than the activity of oxidases. Understanding the relationships between the nature of damage and the response of ecosystem components, such as soil, can allow us to predict the response of ecosystems after forest fires.","PeriodicalId":54166,"journal":{"name":"Nature Conservation Research","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Conservation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2023.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the increasing frequency of fires, the study of the influence of the pyrogenic factor on the state of forest ecosystems is becoming an increasingly relevant research topic for scientists around the world. Of particular interest in the study is not only the direct wildfire impact, but also its indirect influence, which manifests itself in the early stages of succession. The study has been conducted in the Utrish State Nature Reserve, located on the Abrau Peninsula, northwestern part of the Black Sea coast of the Western Caucasus. The area of the State Nature Reserve «Utrish» is similar to the territory of the entire zone of the Mediterranean climate. The wildfire of 2020 has destroyed 4800 trees, and considerably changed biological properties of brown soils that led to a violation of their ecological functions. Changes in soil properties in the first few years after the wildfire impact are studied insufficiently compared to long-term changes. This study was aimed to investigate the activity of soil enzymes from the oxidase and hydrolase classes in the Utrish State Nature Reserve, immediately after the fire impact (2020), one year later (2021), and two years later (2022). During the field surveys, nine monitoring plots were established, i.e. three plots on each site under weak, medium, and strong degrees of the fire-induced damage. During the study, 81 soil samples were collected, i.e. three soil samples from each monitoring plot. Such enzymes as catalase, peroxidase, invertase, urease, and phosphatase were investigated. To assess the ecological condition of soils, we calculated the Integral Indicator of Biological State (IIBS), and determined the content of organic carbon. The results obtained were compared with the control values, typical for the background area of the forest. A correlation and factor analysis have been carried out. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to assess the reliability of the data obtained. The enzyme response depends on the type of enzyme and the degree of fire-induced damage. Immediately after the fire impact (2020), a significant decrease (by 53% in average) in catalase, urease, and invertase activity was found on the sites under weak, medium, and strong degrees of damage. Phosphatase activity did not change significantly, while peroxidase activity increased on average by 47%. In 2020, the ecological condition of soils was determined as unfavourable, with the IIBS equal to 82–90%. The activity of catalase, invertase, urease, and phosphatase increased by an average of 31% for soils with a weak degree of fire-induced damage. In 2021, a decrease in activity of the studied enzymes was noted in post-pyrogenic soils under medium and strong damage degree, but to a lesser extent than in 2020. The activity of catalase and urease decreased for all investigated impacts by 47%. The activity of peroxidase and phosphatase was higher in relation to the control values by 55%. For the weak degree of fire-induced damage, a decrease in phosphatase activity by 16% was found. In 2022 (two years after the fire impact), the ecological condition of soils was still recognised as unfavourable, with the IIBS decreased to 89%. However, it was demonstrated that the activity of enzymes from the class of hydrolases two years after the fire impact was closer to the control values than the activity of oxidases. Understanding the relationships between the nature of damage and the response of ecosystem components, such as soil, can allow us to predict the response of ecosystems after forest fires.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在早期演替阶段,乌特里什国家自然保护区(俄罗斯)后热原土壤的活动
随着火灾的频繁发生,热原因子对森林生态系统状态的影响研究日益成为世界各国科学家关注的研究课题。研究中特别感兴趣的不仅是野火的直接影响,还有它的间接影响,这种影响在演替的早期阶段表现出来。这项研究是在乌特里什国家自然保护区进行的,该保护区位于西高加索黑海海岸西北部的亚伯鲁半岛。国家自然保护区“乌特里什”的面积与整个地中海气候区的面积相似。2020年的野火已经摧毁了4800棵树,并大大改变了棕色土壤的生物特性,导致其生态功能受到破坏。与长期变化相比,野火影响后最初几年土壤性质的变化研究不足。本研究旨在调查Utrish国家自然保护区的氧化酶和水解酶类土壤酶的活性,分别在火灾影响后(2020年)、一年后(2021年)和两年后(2022年)。在现场调查中,建立了9个监测地块,即每个站点分别设置了弱、中、强火害程度监测地块。研究期间共采集土壤样品81份,每个监测地块3份。对过氧化氢酶、过氧化物酶、转化酶、脲酶和磷酸酶等酶进行了研究。为了评价土壤的生态状况,我们计算了生物状态积分指标(IIBS),并测定了有机碳含量。将得到的结果与森林背景区典型的控制值进行了比较。并进行了相关分析和因子分析。使用Mann-Whitney u检验来评估所得数据的可靠性。酶的反应取决于酶的种类和火灾引起的损害程度。火灾发生后(2020年),在弱、中、强损伤位点上,过氧化氢酶、脲酶和转化酶活性显著下降(平均下降53%)。磷酸酶活性变化不显著,过氧化物酶活性平均提高47%。2020年土壤生态条件为不利,ibs为82-90%。火灾损害程度较轻的土壤过氧化氢酶、转化酶、脲酶和磷酸酶活性平均提高31%。2021年,在中、强破坏程度的热原后土壤中,所研究的酶活性下降,但低于2020年。过氧化氢酶和脲酶的活性降低了47%。过氧化物酶和磷酸酶活性较对照提高了55%。对于弱火害程度,磷酸酶活性降低了16%。在2022年(火灾影响的两年后),土壤的生态状况仍然被认为是不利的,ibs下降到89%。然而,研究表明,在火灾发生两年后,水解酶类酶的活性比氧化酶的活性更接近控制值。了解破坏的性质与生态系统组成部分(如土壤)的反应之间的关系,可以使我们预测森林火灾后生态系统的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Conservation Research
Nature Conservation Research BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the threat status of reptile species from Vietnam - Implementation of the One Plan Approach to Conservation Conserving the threatened woody vegetation on dune slopes: Monitoring the decline and designing adaptive strategies for restoration Has climate change hijacked the environmental agenda? Dynamic change of habitat quality and its key driving factors in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China Performance of SNP markers for parentage analysis in the Italian Alpine brown bear using non-invasive samples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1