Improving Writing Skill on Report Text by Using RCG Strategy with PPT for Students of Senior High School

IF 2.5 3区 社会学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES European Journal of Development Research Pub Date : 2022-05-31 DOI:10.28926/jdr.v6i1.218
Dessy Ayu Ardini
{"title":"Improving Writing Skill on Report Text by Using RCG Strategy with PPT for Students of Senior High School","authors":"Dessy Ayu Ardini","doi":"10.28926/jdr.v6i1.218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research, the researchers used Responding, Correcting and Guiding (RCG) Strategy with Power Point (PPT) to solve the students’ problems in writing Report Text. The researchers designed the research problem as follows: How can RCG Strategy with PPT improve writing skill on report text for senior high school students? After applying RCG Strategy in cycle I, the students’ average score result in this cycle was 72.5%. This result was still not satisfying. 55.33% or 8 students could not reach the mean score target of 75. Therefore, the research should continue to the next cycle. In cycle II, the students’ average score was 82.33%. There were only 13.33% or 2 students who got bad scores, it meant that the criteria success had been met and this cycle should be discontinued. Based on the findings, the English teachers were recommended to use RCG for enhancing students’ writing skill by applying all the ways in this strategy, they were: Reacting to the Students’ Work, Correcting to the Students’ Work, Responding to the Students Work, Peer Review, Training Students to Self-Edit and Self-Correct and Making Homework Successful.","PeriodicalId":47650,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Development Research","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Development Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28926/jdr.v6i1.218","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this research, the researchers used Responding, Correcting and Guiding (RCG) Strategy with Power Point (PPT) to solve the students’ problems in writing Report Text. The researchers designed the research problem as follows: How can RCG Strategy with PPT improve writing skill on report text for senior high school students? After applying RCG Strategy in cycle I, the students’ average score result in this cycle was 72.5%. This result was still not satisfying. 55.33% or 8 students could not reach the mean score target of 75. Therefore, the research should continue to the next cycle. In cycle II, the students’ average score was 82.33%. There were only 13.33% or 2 students who got bad scores, it meant that the criteria success had been met and this cycle should be discontinued. Based on the findings, the English teachers were recommended to use RCG for enhancing students’ writing skill by applying all the ways in this strategy, they were: Reacting to the Students’ Work, Correcting to the Students’ Work, Responding to the Students Work, Peer Review, Training Students to Self-Edit and Self-Correct and Making Homework Successful.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用RCG策略提高高中学生PPT报告文本写作水平
在本研究中,研究人员采用响应、纠正和引导(RCG)策略与PPT (PPT)来解决学生在撰写报告文本中的问题。研究者将研究问题设计为:RCG策略配合PPT如何提高高中生报告文本的写作水平?在第一个周期采用RCG策略后,学生在这个周期的平均成绩为72.5%。这个结果仍然不令人满意。55.33%或8名学生未能达到75分的平均分目标。因此,研究应该继续到下一个周期。在第二周期,学生的平均得分为82.33%。只有13.33%或2名学生成绩不佳,这意味着已经达到了成功的标准,这种循环应该停止。在此基础上,建议英语教师运用RCG策略提高学生的写作能力,包括:对学生作业的反应、对学生作业的批改、对学生作业的回应、同侪评议、培养学生的自我编辑和自我纠正以及使作业成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Development Research (EJDR) redefines and modernises what international development is, recognising the many schools of thought on what human development constitutes. It encourages debate between competing approaches to understanding global development and international social development. The journal is multidisciplinary and welcomes papers that are rooted in any mixture of fields including (but not limited to): development studies, international studies, social policy, sociology, politics, economics, anthropology, education, sustainability, business and management. EJDR explicitly links with development studies, being hosted by European Association of Development Institutes (EADI) and its various initiatives. As a double-blind peer-reviewed academic journal, we particularly welcome submissions that improve our conceptual understanding of international development processes, or submissions that propose policy and developmental tools by analysing empirical evidence, whether qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or anecdotal (data use in the journal ranges broadly from narratives and transcripts, through ethnographic and mixed data, to quantitative and survey data). The research methods used in the journal''s articles make explicit the importance of empirical data and the critical interpretation of findings. Authors can use a mixture of theory and data analysis to expand the possibilities for global development. Submissions must be well-grounded in theory and must also indicate how their findings are relevant to development practitioners in the field and/or policy makers. The journal encourages papers which embody the highest quality standards, and which use an innovative approach. We urge authors who contemplate submitting their work to the EJDR to respond to research already published in this journal, as well as complementary journals and books. We take special efforts to include global voices, and notably voices from the global South. Queries about potential submissions to EJDR can be directed to the Editors. EJDR understands development to be an ongoing process that affects all communities, societies, states and regions: We therefore do not have a geographical bias, but wherever possible prospective authors should seek to highlight how their study has relevance to researchers and practitioners studying development in different environments. Although many of the papers we publish examine the challenges for developing countries, we recognize that there are important lessons to be derived from the experiences of regions in the developed world. The EJDR is print-published 6 times a year, in a mix of regular and special theme issues; accepted papers are published on an ongoing basis online. We accept submissions in English and French.
期刊最新文献
Do Behavioral Interventions Enhance the Effects of Cash on Early Childhood Development and Its Determinants? Evidence from a Cluster-Randomized Trial in Madagascar The Role of High-Value Agriculture in Capability Expansion: Qualitative Insights into Smallholder Cash Crop Production in Nepal, Laos and Rwanda Impact of Public Agricultural Investment on Crops Production, Households’ Welfare, and Employment Generation Opportunities in Togo, West Africa ‘Mind the Gaps’: Exploring Regional and Gender Patterns in Threats to Ethiopian Adolescents’ Bodily Integrity Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Limbah Peternakan Ayam Ras Di Kabupaten Muaro Jambi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1