{"title":"Why Tax Planning Without Considering Societal Interests is Unfounded","authors":"Ute Schmiel","doi":"10.1515/ael-2021-0115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The present paper is a commentary on the article “The relationship between Taxation, Accounting and Legal Forms”, which has already been published in AEL: A Convivium. The article deals with Controlled Foreign Corporation rules (CFC rules) from a profit-seeking perspective. It develops tax schemes and assumes them to be adequate means to avoiding the Austrian or German CFC rules. This commentary argues that from the perspective of a critical rationalist methodology, the topic and the findings of the article need to be viewed with some reservation. A substantial objection applies to the article’s statement that the developed tax schemes are adequate to achieve the end of optimising the effective tax rate. However, there is the even more substantial objection that neither the developed tax schemes nor the end of optimising the effective tax rate without taking the interests of society systematically into account are legitimate. However, the article fails to address the major societal issue of how to reduce tax avoidance.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2021-0115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract The present paper is a commentary on the article “The relationship between Taxation, Accounting and Legal Forms”, which has already been published in AEL: A Convivium. The article deals with Controlled Foreign Corporation rules (CFC rules) from a profit-seeking perspective. It develops tax schemes and assumes them to be adequate means to avoiding the Austrian or German CFC rules. This commentary argues that from the perspective of a critical rationalist methodology, the topic and the findings of the article need to be viewed with some reservation. A substantial objection applies to the article’s statement that the developed tax schemes are adequate to achieve the end of optimising the effective tax rate. However, there is the even more substantial objection that neither the developed tax schemes nor the end of optimising the effective tax rate without taking the interests of society systematically into account are legitimate. However, the article fails to address the major societal issue of how to reduce tax avoidance.
摘要本文是对《AEL: a Convivium》上发表的文章《税收、会计和法律形式之间的关系》的评注。本文从逐利的角度探讨受控外国公司规则。它制定了税收计划,并假设这些计划是避免奥地利或德国CFC规则的充分手段。这篇评论认为,从批判理性主义方法论的角度来看,文章的主题和发现需要有所保留。一个实质性的反对适用于文章的声明,即已开发的税收计划足以达到优化有效税率的目的。然而,还有一种更为实质性的反对意见认为,无论是发达的税收计划,还是在不系统地考虑社会利益的情况下优化有效税率的目的,都是不合法的。然而,这篇文章未能解决如何减少避税的主要社会问题。