Climate Impact Measurement In Climate Finance and Carbon Markets

Q3 Social Sciences Carbon and Climate Law Review Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.21552/cclr/2020/3/8
J. Macinante
{"title":"Climate Impact Measurement In Climate Finance and Carbon Markets","authors":"J. Macinante","doi":"10.21552/cclr/2020/3/8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Skepticism over aspects of the carbon markets has the potential to infect perceptions of initiatives seeking to engage the private sector in the gargantuan task of financing the transition to a low-carbon global economy. Climate finance, working in tandem with climate markets, is at the core of the Paris Agreement and the financial flows required to give adequate effect to its implementation cannot happen without the commitment of private finance and the private sector being fully engaged. For this to occur, there must be confidence in the design, operation, and governance of markets; and in relation to mitigation, in the validity and environmental integrity of measurable outcomes. The field of climate data analysis is developing to service the demands of the financial sector, driven in part by anticipated regulatory and disclosure requirements. Yet an examination of the current analytical approaches points to an emphasis on the consequences for corporations, investments, assets, and infrastructure from climate-related risk, as opposed to the consequences for the climate of corporate activities, investments, asset or infrastructure development. While both approaches are legitimate subjects for analysis, the paper argues that this risk bifurcation can and should be addressed to ensure the raison d’être of climate finance and climate markets – transition to a low-carbon economy and the mitigation objectives of global climate policy – is given due weight, through the development of accurate, reliable, comparable metrics that provide clear yardsticks on how climate finance investments are contributing to progress towards the goals of the Paris Agreement.","PeriodicalId":52307,"journal":{"name":"Carbon and Climate Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon and Climate Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2020/3/8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Skepticism over aspects of the carbon markets has the potential to infect perceptions of initiatives seeking to engage the private sector in the gargantuan task of financing the transition to a low-carbon global economy. Climate finance, working in tandem with climate markets, is at the core of the Paris Agreement and the financial flows required to give adequate effect to its implementation cannot happen without the commitment of private finance and the private sector being fully engaged. For this to occur, there must be confidence in the design, operation, and governance of markets; and in relation to mitigation, in the validity and environmental integrity of measurable outcomes. The field of climate data analysis is developing to service the demands of the financial sector, driven in part by anticipated regulatory and disclosure requirements. Yet an examination of the current analytical approaches points to an emphasis on the consequences for corporations, investments, assets, and infrastructure from climate-related risk, as opposed to the consequences for the climate of corporate activities, investments, asset or infrastructure development. While both approaches are legitimate subjects for analysis, the paper argues that this risk bifurcation can and should be addressed to ensure the raison d’être of climate finance and climate markets – transition to a low-carbon economy and the mitigation objectives of global climate policy – is given due weight, through the development of accurate, reliable, comparable metrics that provide clear yardsticks on how climate finance investments are contributing to progress towards the goals of the Paris Agreement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气候融资和碳市场中的气候影响测量
对碳市场某些方面的怀疑,有可能影响人们对寻求让私营部门参与到向低碳全球经济转型融资这一艰巨任务中的举措的看法。气候融资与气候市场协同工作,是《巴黎协定》的核心。如果没有私人融资的承诺和私营部门的充分参与,就不可能实现充分落实《巴黎协定》所需的资金流动。要实现这一点,必须对市场的设计、运作和治理抱有信心;在缓解方面,在可测量结果的有效性和环境完整性方面。气候数据分析领域正在发展,以满足金融部门的需求,部分原因是预期的监管和披露要求。然而,对当前分析方法的考察表明,它们强调的是气候相关风险对企业、投资、资产和基础设施的影响,而不是企业活动、投资、资产或基础设施开发对气候的影响。虽然这两种方法都是合理的分析对象,但该文件认为,这种风险分岔能够而且应该得到解决,以确保气候融资和气候市场的理由être——向低碳经济转型和全球气候政策的缓解目标——得到应有的重视,通过制定准确、可靠、可比较的指标,为气候融资投资如何促进实现《巴黎协定》目标提供明确的衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Carbon and Climate Law Review
Carbon and Climate Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
European Union ∙ European Climate Policy: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back Reparations For Climate Harm and The Role of The Loss and Damage Mechanism: Lessons from Other Areas of Law Bringing the Ocean into National Systemic Climate Litigation – Is Due Diligence a Bridge? Regulatory Approaches to Carbon Dioxide Usage and Storage in the European Union Indonesia ∙ The Voluntary Carbon Market and Indonesian Publicly Listed Companies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1