Teachers’ Views on Taboo Concepts in Philosophical Discussions with Children

Nihan AKKOCAOĞLU ÇAYIR
{"title":"Teachers’ Views on Taboo Concepts in Philosophical Discussions with Children","authors":"Nihan AKKOCAOĞLU ÇAYIR","doi":"10.14689/enad.35.1677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to determine the taboo concepts that teachers tend to avoid during philosophical discussions with children and why these concepts are considered taboo. We focus on teachers’ experiences using phenomenology, a qualitative research design. For this purpose, we used the snowball sampling method to reach 73 teachers and they answered a questionnaire consisting of 5 open-ended questions. We carried out semi-structured interviews with 7 of these teachers to get in-depth responses and to reflect different views on the subject. Accordingly, 65 teachers had one or more taboos, while 8 teachers did not have any taboos. Death, religion, and sexuality emerged as the most prominent taboo concepts. According to the participants, taboos are formed because of children, teachers, and society. The participants expressed that taboos could have a negative impact on the child, the discussion environment, and the teacher, and they offered solutions. Teachers need to develop a better level of competence in engaging in philosophical discussions with children in order to overcome taboo concepts. Teacher training sessions can be organized to address how to approach taboo concepts and how to select children’s books that contain such concepts. Research can be conducted on engaging taboo concepts in philosophical discussions with children. This body of research can explore the impact of questioning such concepts on children’s perspectives toward them.","PeriodicalId":41153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Qualitative Research in Education-Egitimde Nitel Arastirmalar Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Qualitative Research in Education-Egitimde Nitel Arastirmalar Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.35.1677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to determine the taboo concepts that teachers tend to avoid during philosophical discussions with children and why these concepts are considered taboo. We focus on teachers’ experiences using phenomenology, a qualitative research design. For this purpose, we used the snowball sampling method to reach 73 teachers and they answered a questionnaire consisting of 5 open-ended questions. We carried out semi-structured interviews with 7 of these teachers to get in-depth responses and to reflect different views on the subject. Accordingly, 65 teachers had one or more taboos, while 8 teachers did not have any taboos. Death, religion, and sexuality emerged as the most prominent taboo concepts. According to the participants, taboos are formed because of children, teachers, and society. The participants expressed that taboos could have a negative impact on the child, the discussion environment, and the teacher, and they offered solutions. Teachers need to develop a better level of competence in engaging in philosophical discussions with children in order to overcome taboo concepts. Teacher training sessions can be organized to address how to approach taboo concepts and how to select children’s books that contain such concepts. Research can be conducted on engaging taboo concepts in philosophical discussions with children. This body of research can explore the impact of questioning such concepts on children’s perspectives toward them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师对儿童哲学讨论中禁忌概念的看法
本研究旨在确定教师在与儿童进行哲学讨论时倾向于避免的禁忌概念,以及为什么这些概念被认为是禁忌。我们使用现象学,一种定性的研究设计来关注教师的经验。为此,我们采用滚雪球抽样的方法,对73名教师进行了问卷调查,问卷由5个开放式问题组成。我们对其中7位教师进行了半结构化访谈,以获得深入的回应,并反映出对该主题的不同看法。相应的,65位老师有一个或多个禁忌,8位老师没有任何禁忌。死亡、宗教和性成为最突出的禁忌概念。根据参与者的说法,禁忌是由孩子、老师和社会形成的。与会者表示,禁忌可能会对孩子、讨论环境和老师产生负面影响,并提出了解决方案。为了克服禁忌概念,教师需要提高与孩子进行哲学讨论的能力。可以组织教师培训课程,讨论如何接触禁忌概念以及如何选择包含这些概念的儿童书籍。可以研究在与儿童进行哲学讨论时涉及禁忌概念。这个研究机构可以探索质疑这些概念对儿童对它们的看法的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Teacher's Classroom Practices in the Context of Vygotsky's Cultural-Historical Theory The Connection Between Forest School and Preschool Programs: A Comparison Study Management of Artistic Practice Pedagogies of Interdisciplinary Art Students With Critical Analysis Learning Method Online Counseling through the Eyes of University Students Uzaktan Eğitim Kapsamında İlkokul İkinci Sınıf Türkçe Dersinde Çocuklar İçin Felsefe Eğitimi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1