Estimated Pulse Wave Velocity Is Associated With All‐Cause Mortality During 8.5 Years Follow‐up in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Angiography

E. Laugesen, K. Olesen, C. Peters, N. Buus, M. Maeng, H. Bøtker, P. L. Poulsen
{"title":"Estimated Pulse Wave Velocity Is Associated With All‐Cause Mortality During 8.5 Years Follow‐up in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Angiography","authors":"E. Laugesen, K. Olesen, C. Peters, N. Buus, M. Maeng, H. Bøtker, P. L. Poulsen","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.121.025173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV) calculated by equations using age and blood pressure has been suggested as a new marker of mortality and cardiovascular risk. However, the prognostic potential of ePWV during long‐term follow‐up in patients with symptoms of stable angina remains unknown. Methods and Results In this study, ePWV was calculated in 25 066 patients without diabetes, previous myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure, or valvular disease (mean age 63.7±10.5 years, 58% male) with stable angina pectoris undergoing elective coronary angiography during 2003 to 2016. Multivariable Cox models were used to assess the association with incident all‐cause mortality, MI, and stroke. Discrimination was assessed using Harrell´s C‐index. During a median follow‐up period of 8.5 years (interquartile range 5.5–11.3 years), 779 strokes, 1233 MIs, and 4112 deaths were recorded. ePWV was associated with all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] per 1 m/s, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.05–1.21) and MI (HR per 1 m/s 1.23, 95% CI, 1.09–1.39) after adjusting for age, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, smoking, estimated glomerular filtration rate, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, antihypertensive treatment, statins, aspirin, and number of diseased coronary arteries. Compared with traditional risk factors, the adjusted model with ePWV was associated with a minor but likely not clinically relevant increase in discrimination for mortality, 76.63% with ePWV versus 76.56% without ePWV, P<0.05. Conclusions In patients with stable angina pectoris, ePWV was associated with all‐cause mortality and MI beyond traditional risk factors. However, the added prediction of mortality was not improved to a clinically relevant extent.","PeriodicalId":17189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.025173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background Estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV) calculated by equations using age and blood pressure has been suggested as a new marker of mortality and cardiovascular risk. However, the prognostic potential of ePWV during long‐term follow‐up in patients with symptoms of stable angina remains unknown. Methods and Results In this study, ePWV was calculated in 25 066 patients without diabetes, previous myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure, or valvular disease (mean age 63.7±10.5 years, 58% male) with stable angina pectoris undergoing elective coronary angiography during 2003 to 2016. Multivariable Cox models were used to assess the association with incident all‐cause mortality, MI, and stroke. Discrimination was assessed using Harrell´s C‐index. During a median follow‐up period of 8.5 years (interquartile range 5.5–11.3 years), 779 strokes, 1233 MIs, and 4112 deaths were recorded. ePWV was associated with all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] per 1 m/s, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.05–1.21) and MI (HR per 1 m/s 1.23, 95% CI, 1.09–1.39) after adjusting for age, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, smoking, estimated glomerular filtration rate, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, antihypertensive treatment, statins, aspirin, and number of diseased coronary arteries. Compared with traditional risk factors, the adjusted model with ePWV was associated with a minor but likely not clinically relevant increase in discrimination for mortality, 76.63% with ePWV versus 76.56% without ePWV, P<0.05. Conclusions In patients with stable angina pectoris, ePWV was associated with all‐cause mortality and MI beyond traditional risk factors. However, the added prediction of mortality was not improved to a clinically relevant extent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
择期冠状动脉造影患者8.5年随访期间脉搏波速度与全因死亡率相关
背景:利用年龄和血压方程计算出的估计脉搏波速度(ePWV)已被认为是死亡率和心血管风险的新标志。然而,ePWV在稳定型心绞痛患者的长期随访中的预后潜力仍然未知。方法和结果在本研究中,计算了25066例2003年至2016年期间接受择期冠状动脉造影的稳定型心绞痛患者(平均年龄63.7±10.5岁,58%男性)无糖尿病、既往心肌梗死(MI)、卒中、心力衰竭或瓣膜疾病的ePWV。多变量Cox模型用于评估与突发全因死亡率、心肌梗死和卒中的关系。歧视采用Harrell’s C‐index进行评估。在中位8.5年的随访期间(四分位数范围5.5-11.3年),记录了779例中风、1233例心肌梗死和4112例死亡。ePWV与全因死亡率相关(每1米/秒的危险比[HR]为1.13;在调整了年龄、收缩压、体重指数、吸烟、估计肾小球滤过率、Charlson合并症指数评分、降压治疗、他汀类药物、阿司匹林和患病冠状动脉数量后,95% CI, 1.05-1.21)和MI(每1米/秒HR 1.23, 95% CI, 1.09-1.39)。与传统危险因素相比,调整后的模型中有ePWV的患者对死亡率的歧视增加幅度较小,但可能与临床无关,有ePWV的患者对死亡率的歧视增加幅度为76.63%,无ePWV的患者为76.56%,P<0.05。结论:在稳定型心绞痛患者中,ePWV与全因死亡率和心肌梗死相关,超出了传统的危险因素。然而,增加的死亡率预测并没有提高到临床相关的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predictors of Survival in Patients With Ischemic Stroke and Active Cancer: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study Treatment of Slow‐Flow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Flow‐Mediated Hyperemia: The Randomized RAIN‐FLOW Study Predicting Arterial Thrombotic Events Following Peripheral Revascularization Using Objective Viscoelastic Data Safety of Catheter Ablation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Amyloidosis Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With and Without Resheathing and Repositioning: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1