Pentecostal or Born Again? The Relevance of Demarcation Practices for the Study of Nigerian Christianity

Judith C. Bachmann
{"title":"Pentecostal or Born Again? The Relevance of Demarcation Practices for the Study of Nigerian Christianity","authors":"Judith C. Bachmann","doi":"10.1558/PENT.37224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the label \"Pentecostal\" has been applied widely and rather unquestioned to churches in Nigeria. Yet, in the 1990s and 2000s, a proposal was issued to study Nigerian Pentecostals in terms of their most common designation on the ground as the \"born again\" movement. Building on this approach based on observations from fieldwork in southwestern Nigeria, the article argues that the identification as \"born again\" was much more common than \"Pentecostal\", which held almost no significance on its own and did thus not really distinguish groups from each other. The emphasis on the \"born again\" experience, however, was widespread but also served to demarcate \"real\" or \"committed\" Christians from \"corrupted\" ones. This demarcation was upheld against mission churches, white garment churches and especially traditional healing practices as the source of the supposed \"corruption\". The article thus contends that even the study of \"born again\" Christianity, though based on field observations more compelling than that of \"Pentecostalism\", needs to consider the concrete and contextual boundaries drawn to establish identities such as \"born again\" and/or \"Pentecostal\".","PeriodicalId":41497,"journal":{"name":"PentecoStudies-An Interdisciplinary Journal for Research on the Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PentecoStudies-An Interdisciplinary Journal for Research on the Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/PENT.37224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In recent years, the label "Pentecostal" has been applied widely and rather unquestioned to churches in Nigeria. Yet, in the 1990s and 2000s, a proposal was issued to study Nigerian Pentecostals in terms of their most common designation on the ground as the "born again" movement. Building on this approach based on observations from fieldwork in southwestern Nigeria, the article argues that the identification as "born again" was much more common than "Pentecostal", which held almost no significance on its own and did thus not really distinguish groups from each other. The emphasis on the "born again" experience, however, was widespread but also served to demarcate "real" or "committed" Christians from "corrupted" ones. This demarcation was upheld against mission churches, white garment churches and especially traditional healing practices as the source of the supposed "corruption". The article thus contends that even the study of "born again" Christianity, though based on field observations more compelling than that of "Pentecostalism", needs to consider the concrete and contextual boundaries drawn to establish identities such as "born again" and/or "Pentecostal".
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
五旬节派还是重生派?划界实践对尼日利亚基督教研究的意义
近年来,“五旬节派”这个标签被广泛应用于尼日利亚的教堂,而且毫无疑问。然而,在20世纪90年代和21世纪初,有人提议研究尼日利亚五旬节派,因为他们在当地最常见的名称是“重生”运动。基于对尼日利亚西南部田野调查的观察,这篇文章认为,“重生”的认同比“五旬节派”更普遍,后者本身几乎没有任何意义,因此并不能真正区分不同的群体。然而,对“重生”经历的强调很普遍,但也被用来区分“真正的”或“委身的”基督徒与“败坏的”基督徒。这种区分被认为是所谓“腐败”的根源,反对传教教会、白衣教会,特别是传统的治疗做法。因此,这篇文章认为,即使是对“重生”基督教的研究,尽管基于比“五旬节派”更有说服力的实地观察,也需要考虑为建立“重生”和/或“五旬节派”等身份而划定的具体和背景界限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: PentecoStudies offers a distinctly interdisciplinary forum for the study of Pentecostal and Charismatic Christianity. Authors from the social sciences, the humanities, cultural studies, religious studies and theology are all welcome to submit research on global expressions of Pentecostalism defined in its broadest sense. The journal invites work that attends to historical, contemporary and regional studies. In particular, it is interested in the global expansion of Pentecostalism, its mutations and impact on society, culture and the media, including its influence on traditional non-Pentecostal churches. Comparative research is encouraged, especially if it is based on different regional studies and contributes to our understanding of globalization and the role of Pentecostalism in post-colonial contexts. Attention to the lived experience of religion is important and studies that include empirical research are welcome, as well as theoretical studies. Theological contributions that assist our understanding of the beliefs and practices of Pentecostal Christians are essential and these are best placed if they engage in a dialogue with the broader traditions of philiosophy and theology, especially ecumenical dialogue. Finally, in this age of many faiths, it is important that the impact of Pentecostalism on other religious traditions is researched and vice versa. Pentecostal and Charismatic Christianity ("Pentecostalisms") cannot be fully appreciated in isolation but must be understood in all its complexity when it is placed in multiple contexts and viewed through multiple lenses. The journal aims to fulfil this important research need.
期刊最新文献
SAHOO, Sarbeswar. Pentecostalism and Politics of Conversion in India All Local Coherences RUTH, Lester and Swee Hong LIM. A History of Contemporary Praise and Worship Review. Understanding the Ideas that Reshaped the Protestant Church WILKINSON, Michael and Linda M. AMBROSE. After the Revival: Pentecostalism and the Making of a Canadian Church NYANNI, Caleb Opoku. Second-Generation African Pentecostals in the West: An Emerging Paradigm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1