A systematic review for netizens’ response to the truth manipulation on social media

IF 2.5 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Knowledge Management & E-Learning-An International Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-10 DOI:10.34105/j.kmel.2023.15.018
Muhammad Akram, A. Nasar, Adeela Arshad-Ayaz
{"title":"A systematic review for netizens’ response to the truth manipulation on social media","authors":"Muhammad Akram, A. Nasar, Adeela Arshad-Ayaz","doi":"10.34105/j.kmel.2023.15.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The manipulated or manufactured truth on social media platforms spreads false information to influence netizens’ cognition, often resulting in fabricated social and political narratives. This study systematically reviews the literature on truth manipulation and its impact on the cognition of social media users. The primary focus is on disinformation, misinformation, fake news, and propaganda. The study appraises 162 peer-reviewed publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection database using the systematic review method. The data was put through a bibliometric analysis to unpack the evolutionary nuances of netizens’ cognitive response to manufactured truth, informativity, and manipulation on social media. The study highlights emerging trends and issues from truth manipulation on social media. The bibliometric analysis reveals since 2017, there has been an increase in the trend of scholarly work about truth manipulation on social media and its effects on the cognition of netizens. The USA seems to be the most prominent node to contribute to the study of truth manipulation. The content analysis shows multiple aspects causing truth manipulation. This study also seeks ways and methods to prevent and counter truth manipulation on social media. It looks at the possibilities of altering netizens’ cognitive abilities by improving their critical social media literacies through fact-checking. The study results show that knowledge gaps persist in truth manipulation on social media and the cognitional aspects in response to fabricated narratives. We emphasize the importance of further investigations in this domain.","PeriodicalId":45327,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Management & E-Learning-An International Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Management & E-Learning-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2023.15.018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The manipulated or manufactured truth on social media platforms spreads false information to influence netizens’ cognition, often resulting in fabricated social and political narratives. This study systematically reviews the literature on truth manipulation and its impact on the cognition of social media users. The primary focus is on disinformation, misinformation, fake news, and propaganda. The study appraises 162 peer-reviewed publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection database using the systematic review method. The data was put through a bibliometric analysis to unpack the evolutionary nuances of netizens’ cognitive response to manufactured truth, informativity, and manipulation on social media. The study highlights emerging trends and issues from truth manipulation on social media. The bibliometric analysis reveals since 2017, there has been an increase in the trend of scholarly work about truth manipulation on social media and its effects on the cognition of netizens. The USA seems to be the most prominent node to contribute to the study of truth manipulation. The content analysis shows multiple aspects causing truth manipulation. This study also seeks ways and methods to prevent and counter truth manipulation on social media. It looks at the possibilities of altering netizens’ cognitive abilities by improving their critical social media literacies through fact-checking. The study results show that knowledge gaps persist in truth manipulation on social media and the cognitional aspects in response to fabricated narratives. We emphasize the importance of further investigations in this domain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对网民对社交媒体上真相操纵的反应进行系统回顾
社交媒体平台上被操纵或制造的真相传播虚假信息,影响网民的认知,往往导致编造的社会和政治叙事。本研究系统回顾了有关真相操纵及其对社交媒体用户认知影响的文献。主要关注的是虚假信息、错误信息、假新闻和宣传。本研究采用系统评价方法,对Web of Science Core Collection数据库中收录的162篇同行评议出版物进行了评价。这些数据通过文献计量分析来揭示网民对社交媒体上制造的真相、信息性和操纵的认知反应的进化细微差别。该研究强调了社交媒体上操纵真相的新趋势和问题。文献计量分析显示,自2017年以来,关于社交媒体上的真相操纵及其对网民认知影响的学术研究呈增加趋势。美国似乎是对真相操纵研究贡献最大的节点。内容分析表明,造成真相操纵的原因是多方面的。本研究还寻求防止和对抗社交媒体上的真相操纵的方法和方法。它着眼于通过事实核查来提高网民对社交媒体的批判性素养,从而改变网民认知能力的可能性。研究结果表明,在社交媒体上的真相操纵和对虚构叙事的认知方面,知识差距仍然存在。我们强调在这一领域进行进一步调查的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
A scoping review comparing different mapping approaches pointing to the need for standardizing concept maps in medical education: A preliminary analysis Analyzing the syntax and salience of causal links embedded within semantic links in concept maps: Implications for temporal flow and learning transfer Concept maps for formative assessment: Creation and implementation of an automatic and intelligent evaluation method Editorial: Concept mapping: Improving learning and understanding Improving learning and understanding through concept mapping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1