Mechanical, Structural, and Physiologic Differences in Human Elastic and Muscular Arteries of Different Ages: Comparison of the Thoracic Aorta to the Superficial Femoral Artery

M. Jadidi, S. A. Razian, Mahmoud Habibnezhad, Eric Anttila, A. Kamenskiy
{"title":"Mechanical, Structural, and Physiologic Differences in Human Elastic and Muscular Arteries of Different Ages: Comparison of the Thoracic Aorta to the Superficial Femoral Artery","authors":"M. Jadidi, S. A. Razian, Mahmoud Habibnezhad, Eric Anttila, A. Kamenskiy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3681037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elastic and muscular arteries differ in structure, function, and mechanical properties, and may adapt differently to aging. We compared the descending thoracic aortas (TA) and the superficial femoral arteries (SFA) of 27 tissue donors (average 41±18 years, range 13-73 years) using planar biaxial testing, constitutive modeling, and bidirectional histology. Both TAs and SFAs increased in size with age, with the outer radius increasing more than the inner radius, but the TAs thickened 6-fold and widened 3-fold faster than the SFAs. The circumferential opening angle did not change in the TA, but increased 2.4-fold in the SFA. Young TAs were relatively isotropic, but the anisotropy increased with age due to longitudinal stiffening. SFAs were 51% more compliant longitudinally irrespective of age. Older TAs and SFAs were stiffer, but the SFA stiffened 5.6-fold faster circumferentially than the TA. Physiologic stresses decreased with age in both arteries, with greater changes occurring longitudinally. TAs had larger circumferential, but smaller longitudinal stresses than the SFAs, larger cardiac cycle stretch, 36% lower circumferential stiffness, and 8-fold more elastic energy available for pulsation. TAs contained elastin sheets separated by smooth muscle cells (SMCs), collagen, and glycosaminoglycans, while the SFAs had SMCs, collagen, and longitudinal elastic fibers. With age, densities of elastin and SMCs decreased, collagen remained constant due to medial thickening, and the glycosaminoglycans increased. Elastic and muscular arteries demonstrate different morphological, mechanical, physiologic, and structural characteristics and adapt differently to aging. While the aortas remodel to preserve the Windkessel function, the SFAs maintain higher longitudinal compliance.","PeriodicalId":11894,"journal":{"name":"EngRN: Biomaterials (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EngRN: Biomaterials (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3681037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Elastic and muscular arteries differ in structure, function, and mechanical properties, and may adapt differently to aging. We compared the descending thoracic aortas (TA) and the superficial femoral arteries (SFA) of 27 tissue donors (average 41±18 years, range 13-73 years) using planar biaxial testing, constitutive modeling, and bidirectional histology. Both TAs and SFAs increased in size with age, with the outer radius increasing more than the inner radius, but the TAs thickened 6-fold and widened 3-fold faster than the SFAs. The circumferential opening angle did not change in the TA, but increased 2.4-fold in the SFA. Young TAs were relatively isotropic, but the anisotropy increased with age due to longitudinal stiffening. SFAs were 51% more compliant longitudinally irrespective of age. Older TAs and SFAs were stiffer, but the SFA stiffened 5.6-fold faster circumferentially than the TA. Physiologic stresses decreased with age in both arteries, with greater changes occurring longitudinally. TAs had larger circumferential, but smaller longitudinal stresses than the SFAs, larger cardiac cycle stretch, 36% lower circumferential stiffness, and 8-fold more elastic energy available for pulsation. TAs contained elastin sheets separated by smooth muscle cells (SMCs), collagen, and glycosaminoglycans, while the SFAs had SMCs, collagen, and longitudinal elastic fibers. With age, densities of elastin and SMCs decreased, collagen remained constant due to medial thickening, and the glycosaminoglycans increased. Elastic and muscular arteries demonstrate different morphological, mechanical, physiologic, and structural characteristics and adapt differently to aging. While the aortas remodel to preserve the Windkessel function, the SFAs maintain higher longitudinal compliance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同年龄人体弹性动脉和肌肉动脉的力学、结构和生理差异:胸主动脉与股浅动脉的比较
弹性动脉和肌肉动脉在结构、功能和机械特性上不同,对衰老的适应也不同。我们通过平面双轴测试、本构模型和双向组织学比较了27例组织供体(平均41±18岁,范围13-73岁)的胸降主动脉(TA)和股浅动脉(SFA)。随着年龄的增长,ta和sfa的大小都在增加,外半径的增加大于内半径,但ta的增厚速度比sfa快6倍,增宽速度快3倍。TA的周向开孔角度没有变化,但SFA的开孔角度增加了2.4倍。年轻ta是相对各向同性的,但由于纵向硬化,各向异性随着年龄的增长而增加。无论年龄大小,sfa的纵向依从性都高出51%。较老的TA和SFA变硬,但SFA的周向变硬速度比TA快5.6倍。两种动脉的生理压力随年龄的增长而下降,纵向变化更大。与sfa相比,ta具有更大的周向应力,但更小的纵向应力,更大的心周期拉伸,低36%的周向刚度和8倍的可用于脉动的弹性能量。TAs含有由平滑肌细胞(SMCs)、胶原蛋白和糖胺聚糖分离的弹性蛋白片,而sfa含有SMCs、胶原蛋白和纵向弹性纤维。随着年龄的增长,弹性蛋白和SMCs的密度下降,胶原蛋白因内侧增厚而保持不变,糖胺聚糖增加。弹性动脉和肌肉动脉表现出不同的形态、力学、生理和结构特征,对衰老的适应也不同。当主动脉重塑以保持Windkessel功能时,SFAs保持较高的纵向顺应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reversible Molecular Motional Switch Based on Circular Photoactive Protein Oligomers: Unexpected Photo-Induced Contraction 3D Bioprinting of Prevascularised Implants for the Repair of Critically Sized Bone Defects Super Absorbent Silk Fibroin Hydrogel Thiophene Donor for NIR-II Fluorescence Imaging Guided Photothermal/Photodynamic/Chemo Combination Therapy Efficient Delivery of Cytosolic Proteins by Protein-Hexahistidine-Metal Co-Assemblies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1