Protecting Human Rights through a Global Encryption Provision

IF 0.6 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI:10.1017/9781780688909.006
D. Povse
{"title":"Protecting Human Rights through a Global Encryption Provision","authors":"D. Povse","doi":"10.1017/9781780688909.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a global digital economy, data pass through servers, located in diff erent countries with diverse rules on data protection security. Diff erent standards and requirements lead to the problem of the global system only being as strong (or weak) as cyber-security requirements in the “least trusted country”.1 Encryption is oft en put forward by the crypto experts as an eff ective security measure. At its core, encryption transforms text-information into a seemingly random string of words and letters that can only be deciphered by using another bit of information, called the decryption key. Th e rules on use of encryption vary and some countries have adopted regimes that may compromise information and conversations despite use of appropriate encryption techniques.2 Encryption is also an important measure contributing to human rights, especially freedom of expression and the right to privacy. It keeps communications inaccessible and safe from prying eyes, enabling the sharing of opinion, accessing online information and organising with others to counter injustices.3 In data protection, encryption is a privacy preserving technique, that also contributes to security of processing personal data.4","PeriodicalId":43224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780688909.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a global digital economy, data pass through servers, located in diff erent countries with diverse rules on data protection security. Diff erent standards and requirements lead to the problem of the global system only being as strong (or weak) as cyber-security requirements in the “least trusted country”.1 Encryption is oft en put forward by the crypto experts as an eff ective security measure. At its core, encryption transforms text-information into a seemingly random string of words and letters that can only be deciphered by using another bit of information, called the decryption key. Th e rules on use of encryption vary and some countries have adopted regimes that may compromise information and conversations despite use of appropriate encryption techniques.2 Encryption is also an important measure contributing to human rights, especially freedom of expression and the right to privacy. It keeps communications inaccessible and safe from prying eyes, enabling the sharing of opinion, accessing online information and organising with others to counter injustices.3 In data protection, encryption is a privacy preserving technique, that also contributes to security of processing personal data.4
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过全球加密条款保护人权
在全球数字经济中,数据通过位于不同国家的服务器进行传输,这些国家对数据保护安全的规定各不相同。不同的标准和要求导致全球体系的强弱取决于“最不受信任国家”的网络安全要求加密是加密专家经常提出的一种有效的安全措施。加密的核心是将文本信息转换成一串看似随机的单词和字母,只有使用另一个被称为解密密钥的信息才能解密。使用加密的规则各不相同,一些国家采用的制度可能会损害信息和对话,尽管使用了适当的加密技术加密也是促进人权,特别是言论自由和隐私权的重要措施。它使人们无法交流,也不会被窥探,使人们能够分享意见,访问在线信息,并与他人组织起来反对不公正在数据保护中,加密是一种保护隐私的技术,它也有助于处理个人数据的安全性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law
Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A CRITICAL COMPARISON OF BRAVE BROWSER AND GOOGLE CHROME FORENSIC ARTEFACTS Fault Lines In The Application Of International Humanitarian Law To Cyberwarfare To License or Not to License Reexamined: An Updated Report on Licensing of Digital Examiners Under State Private Investigator Statutes Forensic Discoverability of iOS Vault Applications A Combined Approach For Private Indexing Mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1