The level of perceived efficacy from teachers to access AI-based teaching applications

IF 3.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning Pub Date : 2022-12-05 DOI:10.58459/rptel.2023.18021
C. Chou, Tsu-Chi Shen, Tsu-Chuan Shen, C. Shen
{"title":"The level of perceived efficacy from teachers to access AI-based teaching applications","authors":"C. Chou, Tsu-Chi Shen, Tsu-Chuan Shen, C. Shen","doi":"10.58459/rptel.2023.18021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to develop the ‘Teachers’ Efficacy Perceptions of the AI-based Teaching Applications (TEP-AITA) scale’ and to describe the analysis of the background variables and the differences between six factors in the application of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) teaching efficacy perceptions questionnaire. In total, 714 vocational senior high school teachers participated in random and cluster sampling in Taiwan. The results showed that the internal consistency reliability of the measure was .988 and that the reliability of the six subscales was .975, .971, .981, .976, .972, and .967. The results found that TEP-AITA scale included ‘Resource support’, ‘Innovative teaching’, ‘Cross-disciplinary’, ‘Professional learning’, ‘Learner demand’, and ‘Self-reflection’. ‘Cross-disciplinary’ and ‘Learner demand’ were highly rated, while ’Resource support’ was low. This study analyzed the differences in the perceived efficacy for AI-based teaching applications among teachers according to their background variables, such as their gender, current position, school attributes, teachers’ seniority, and application AI teaching experience. The research results on teacher background factors and the six factors of the TEP-AITA scale could be provided to education units for the active promotion of AI information technology teaching and training.","PeriodicalId":37055,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":"105 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop the ‘Teachers’ Efficacy Perceptions of the AI-based Teaching Applications (TEP-AITA) scale’ and to describe the analysis of the background variables and the differences between six factors in the application of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) teaching efficacy perceptions questionnaire. In total, 714 vocational senior high school teachers participated in random and cluster sampling in Taiwan. The results showed that the internal consistency reliability of the measure was .988 and that the reliability of the six subscales was .975, .971, .981, .976, .972, and .967. The results found that TEP-AITA scale included ‘Resource support’, ‘Innovative teaching’, ‘Cross-disciplinary’, ‘Professional learning’, ‘Learner demand’, and ‘Self-reflection’. ‘Cross-disciplinary’ and ‘Learner demand’ were highly rated, while ’Resource support’ was low. This study analyzed the differences in the perceived efficacy for AI-based teaching applications among teachers according to their background variables, such as their gender, current position, school attributes, teachers’ seniority, and application AI teaching experience. The research results on teacher background factors and the six factors of the TEP-AITA scale could be provided to education units for the active promotion of AI information technology teaching and training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师对使用基于人工智能的教学应用程序的感知效能水平
本研究的目的是编制“教师对人工智能教学应用的效能感量表”,并描述在人工智能教学效能感问卷的应用中对背景变量和六个因素之间差异的分析。共对714名职业高中教师进行随机整群抽样。结果表明,量表的内部一致性信度为0.988,六个分量表的信度分别为0.975、0.971、0.981、0.976、0.972和0.967。结果发现,TEP-AITA量表包括“资源支持”、“创新教学”、“跨学科”、“专业学习”、“学习者需求”和“自我反思”。“跨学科”和“学习者需求”的评价很高,而“资源支持”的评价很低。本研究根据教师的性别、当前职位、学校属性、教师年资、应用AI教学经验等背景变量,分析教师对AI教学应用感知效能的差异。教师背景因素和TEP-AITA量表六个因素的研究结果可提供给教育单位,积极推进人工智能信息技术教学与培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
28
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
An investigation of students and teachers’ new media literacy: the contributing characteristics with the moderator role of gender Classroom implementation of an auxiliary problem presentation system for mechanics adapted to learners’ errors Correlation among game addiction, achievement emotion, and learning motivation: A study of Indonesian youth in the context of e-learning system The influence of gender on STEM career choice: A partial least squares analysis “I felt like I was on campus” creating a situated learning environment through Instagram
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1