“A Whole New Take on Indigenous”: Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake as Wild Animal Story

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN STUDIES IN CANADIAN LITERATURE-ETUDES EN LITTERATURE CANADIENNE Pub Date : 2019-07-24 DOI:10.7202/1062362AR
Lee Frew
{"title":"“A Whole New Take on Indigenous”: Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake as Wild Animal Story","authors":"Lee Frew","doi":"10.7202/1062362AR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam trilogy has met with popular acclaim and generated considerable scholarly interest since the 2003 publication of its first volume, Oryx and Crake . The implicit critique of Western capitalism presented in Atwood’s dystopian vision of a post-democratic, post-national, and post-human future seems to offer a wide appeal, particularly at a time of sustained environmental crisis. Instead of evaluating the merits of Atwood’s critique, however, this paper examines the ways in which the speculative future of Oryx and Crake and the warnings it contains are delimited by a problematic Second World paradigm. More specifically, the novel can be read in terms of the wild animal story, a genre first established in late-nineteenth-century Canada that Atwood herself was instrumental in defining as such in her controversial 1972 study Survival: A Thematic Guide to Canadian Literature . In keeping with the conventions of the wild animal story, boundary crossings in Atwood’s novel engage in indigenizing fantasy. Despite its powerful warning of imminent disaster, Oryx and Crake nevertheless obscures ongoing colonializing acts by privileging a settler subject-position conceived as endangered by the forces of modernity","PeriodicalId":42265,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN CANADIAN LITERATURE-ETUDES EN LITTERATURE CANADIENNE","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN CANADIAN LITERATURE-ETUDES EN LITTERATURE CANADIENNE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1062362AR","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam trilogy has met with popular acclaim and generated considerable scholarly interest since the 2003 publication of its first volume, Oryx and Crake . The implicit critique of Western capitalism presented in Atwood’s dystopian vision of a post-democratic, post-national, and post-human future seems to offer a wide appeal, particularly at a time of sustained environmental crisis. Instead of evaluating the merits of Atwood’s critique, however, this paper examines the ways in which the speculative future of Oryx and Crake and the warnings it contains are delimited by a problematic Second World paradigm. More specifically, the novel can be read in terms of the wild animal story, a genre first established in late-nineteenth-century Canada that Atwood herself was instrumental in defining as such in her controversial 1972 study Survival: A Thematic Guide to Canadian Literature . In keeping with the conventions of the wild animal story, boundary crossings in Atwood’s novel engage in indigenizing fantasy. Despite its powerful warning of imminent disaster, Oryx and Crake nevertheless obscures ongoing colonializing acts by privileging a settler subject-position conceived as endangered by the forces of modernity
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“对土著的全新认识”:玛格丽特·阿特伍德的《羚羊和秧鸡的野生动物故事》
玛格丽特·阿特伍德的《疯狂亚当》三部曲自2003年第一卷《羚羊与克雷克》出版以来,广受好评,并引起了相当大的学术兴趣。在阿特伍德对后民主、后民族、后人类未来的反乌托邦愿景中,对西方资本主义的含蓄批判似乎提供了广泛的吸引力,尤其是在持续的环境危机时期。然而,本文并没有评价阿特伍德批判的优点,而是考察了《羚羊与秧鸡》的投机性未来及其所包含的警告是如何被一个有问题的第二世界范式所界定的。更具体地说,这部小说可以从野生动物故事的角度来解读,这种类型最早出现在19世纪晚期的加拿大,阿特伍德自己在1972年有争议的研究《生存:加拿大文学主题指南》中对其进行了定义。为了与野生动物故事的传统保持一致,阿特伍德小说中的边界跨越涉及本土化幻想。尽管它对即将到来的灾难发出了强有力的警告,但《羚羊与秧鸡》仍然通过赋予被现代性力量所威胁的定居者主体地位的特权,掩盖了正在进行的殖民行为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
STUDIES IN CANADIAN LITERATURE-ETUDES EN LITTERATURE CANADIENNE
STUDIES IN CANADIAN LITERATURE-ETUDES EN LITTERATURE CANADIENNE LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
“But How, How to Exist and Not to Belong?”: Hybridity and Trauma in Rawi Hage’s Cockroach Richesse et pauvreté des portraits de Seth en postures de fan Anna Minerva Henderson’s Citadel and Gloria Ann Wesley’s To My Someday Child: A Close Reading of Two Maritime Voices The Work of Reading Sachiko Murakami’s Rebuild: Situating Community-Engaged Learning in the Classroom Hugh MacLennan and the Two Solitudes of Hockey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1