Ruminal Lipid A Analysis by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry

E. Sarmikasoglou, J. Vinyard, Mohamed S. Khan, Treenate Jiranantasak, A. Ravelo, R. Lobo, P. Fan, K. Jeong, A. Tuanyok, A. Faciola
{"title":"Ruminal Lipid A Analysis by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry","authors":"E. Sarmikasoglou, J. Vinyard, Mohamed S. Khan, Treenate Jiranantasak, A. Ravelo, R. Lobo, P. Fan, K. Jeong, A. Tuanyok, A. Faciola","doi":"10.3390/polysaccharides2040049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) are cell wall components from Gram-negative bacteria and are composed of three covalently linked regions: the O-antigen, the core oligosaccharide, and the lipid A moiety, which carries most of their endotoxic activity. The objective of this study was to isolate and compare the lipid A structures from ruminal LPS derived from total mixed ration (TMR)- and pasture-fed cows, by using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Ruminal bacteria were collected from two rumen-cannulated Holstein cows; one fed a TMR (60:40, forage–concentrate) and the other pasture fed. The representativeness of each sample was validated by comparing the rumen microbiome from the cows in our study to the core rumen microbiome from the previous literature. Lipopolysaccharides from each respective sample were extracted with a phenol–water extraction procedure and purified via ultracentrifugation. To isolate lipid A from the core and O-antigen, pure ruminal LPS samples were hydrolyzed with acetic acid. Lipid A derived from the TMR-fed cow potentially exhibited a tetra-acylated structure, whereas lipid A derived from the pasture-fed cow potentially exhibited a penta-acylated lipid A structure. Both samples were quantified using limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay and exhibited low endotoxic activity, consistent with the MALDI-TOF MS observations. Results indicate that the lipid A acylation pattern differs between diets, and that ruminal bacteria express solely under-acylated lipid A structures contrary to hexa-acylated lipid A, typically expressed by bacteria such as E. coli.","PeriodicalId":18775,"journal":{"name":"Natural Polysaccharides in Drug Delivery and Biomedical Applications","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Polysaccharides in Drug Delivery and Biomedical Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/polysaccharides2040049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) are cell wall components from Gram-negative bacteria and are composed of three covalently linked regions: the O-antigen, the core oligosaccharide, and the lipid A moiety, which carries most of their endotoxic activity. The objective of this study was to isolate and compare the lipid A structures from ruminal LPS derived from total mixed ration (TMR)- and pasture-fed cows, by using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Ruminal bacteria were collected from two rumen-cannulated Holstein cows; one fed a TMR (60:40, forage–concentrate) and the other pasture fed. The representativeness of each sample was validated by comparing the rumen microbiome from the cows in our study to the core rumen microbiome from the previous literature. Lipopolysaccharides from each respective sample were extracted with a phenol–water extraction procedure and purified via ultracentrifugation. To isolate lipid A from the core and O-antigen, pure ruminal LPS samples were hydrolyzed with acetic acid. Lipid A derived from the TMR-fed cow potentially exhibited a tetra-acylated structure, whereas lipid A derived from the pasture-fed cow potentially exhibited a penta-acylated lipid A structure. Both samples were quantified using limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay and exhibited low endotoxic activity, consistent with the MALDI-TOF MS observations. Results indicate that the lipid A acylation pattern differs between diets, and that ruminal bacteria express solely under-acylated lipid A structures contrary to hexa-acylated lipid A, typically expressed by bacteria such as E. coli.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱法分析瘤胃脂质A
脂多糖(LPS)是革兰氏阴性菌的细胞壁成分,由三个共价连接的区域组成:o抗原、核心低聚糖和脂质A部分,其中脂质A部分具有大部分内毒活性。本研究的目的是利用基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)分离和比较全混合日粮(TMR)和放牧奶牛瘤胃脂多糖(LPS)的脂质A结构。采集2头荷兰斯坦奶牛瘤胃细菌;一组饲喂TMR(60:40,牧草精料),另一组饲喂牧草。通过将本研究奶牛的瘤胃微生物组与先前文献中的核心瘤胃微生物组进行比较,验证了每个样本的代表性。用苯酚-水萃取法提取各样品中的脂多糖,并进行超离心纯化。为了从核心和o抗原中分离脂质A,用醋酸水解纯瘤胃LPS样品。来自tmr喂养奶牛的脂质A可能表现为四酰化结构,而来自牧场喂养奶牛的脂质A可能表现为五酰化脂质A结构。两种样品均使用鲎试剂(LAL)测定法进行定量,显示出低内毒活性,与MALDI-TOF MS观察结果一致。结果表明,不同饲粮的脂质A酰化模式不同,瘤胃细菌只表达低酰化的脂质A结构,而非六酰化的脂质A,通常由大肠杆菌等细菌表达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficient (Bio)emulsification/Degradation of Crude Oil Using Cellulose Nanocrystals Advancing Paper Industry Applications with Extruded Cationic Wheat Starch as an Environmentally Friendly Biopolymer Algal Polysaccharides-Based Nanomaterials: General Aspects and Potential Applications in Food and Biomedical Fields Enzymatic Treatment of Ferulated Arabinoxylans from Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles: Influence on the Fabrication of Covalent Electro-Sprayed Nanoparticles In Vitro Biological Properties of Cyclodextrin-Based Polymers: Interaction with Human Serum Albumin, Red Blood Cells and Bacteria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1