«THE INTERLOCUTOR YOU DESERVED IT...» (REFLECTIONS ON THE BOOK)

Abstract

The article is devoted to reflections on the problems raised in S. V. Taranov’s book “Should Be”. Critically interpreted author’s concept of the philosophical understanding of God from the point of view of revealing the divine as the horizon of human existence. The correctness and heuristics of the author’s proposed approach to the understanding of such an understanding in the context of the “ontological triad” “Nothing-Being-Existence” is shown, which is interpreted with the help of the “anthropological-hermeneutic” key “Question-Answer-Decision”. From here, according to the critic, a meaningful perspective of the development of “philosophical theodicy” into a kind of anthropodicy opens up. At the same time, the article also contains self-criticism, because any interpretation always includes the interpreter himself, therefore, in the interpretation itself, the problem of choosing a methodological and worldview position arises. hence the problem of responsibility.