Christopher Groves, K. Henwood, N. Pidgeon, C. Cherry, E. Roberts, F. Shirani, G. Thomas
{"title":"Putting visions in their place: responsible research and innovation for energy system decarbonization","authors":"Christopher Groves, K. Henwood, N. Pidgeon, C. Cherry, E. Roberts, F. Shirani, G. Thomas","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2022.2149954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decarbonizing energy systems is an ambitious sociotechnical project, and will have signi fi cant implications for social justice, given the increasing dependence of societies globally on energy services. Eliciting non-expert values and perspectives to help re fl ect on the desirability of visions of socio-technical change has long been promoted within RRI. However, RRI has focused on speci fi c technological proposals and visions, and not encompassed socio-technical systems. Decarbonizing energy requires systemic change involving socio-technical con fi gurations that will vary depending upon geographical constraints and community needs in their host locations. Our case study from Wales, UK shows how fi ndings from interpretative risk research and scholarship on energy and everyday life can help design upstream participatory processes that address simultaneously systems, e ff ects on place, and everyday life. Engaging community residents through community mapping explores these dimensions of energy transition, enriching and enlarging understandings of both local and systemic aspects of the energy transition.","PeriodicalId":46727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2149954","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Decarbonizing energy systems is an ambitious sociotechnical project, and will have signi fi cant implications for social justice, given the increasing dependence of societies globally on energy services. Eliciting non-expert values and perspectives to help re fl ect on the desirability of visions of socio-technical change has long been promoted within RRI. However, RRI has focused on speci fi c technological proposals and visions, and not encompassed socio-technical systems. Decarbonizing energy requires systemic change involving socio-technical con fi gurations that will vary depending upon geographical constraints and community needs in their host locations. Our case study from Wales, UK shows how fi ndings from interpretative risk research and scholarship on energy and everyday life can help design upstream participatory processes that address simultaneously systems, e ff ects on place, and everyday life. Engaging community residents through community mapping explores these dimensions of energy transition, enriching and enlarging understandings of both local and systemic aspects of the energy transition.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Responsible Innovation (JRI) provides a forum for discussions of the normative assessment and governance of knowledge-based innovation. JRI offers humanists, social scientists, policy analysts and legal scholars, and natural scientists and engineers an opportunity to articulate, strengthen, and critique the relations among approaches to responsible innovation, thus giving further shape to a newly emerging community of research and practice. These approaches include ethics, technology assessment, governance, sustainability, socio-technical integration, and others. JRI intends responsible innovation to be inclusive of such terms as responsible development and sustainable development, and the journal invites comparisons and contrasts among such concepts. While issues of risk and environmental health and safety are relevant, JRI especially encourages attention to the assessment of the broader and more subtle human and social dimensions of innovation—including moral, cultural, political, and religious dimensions, social risk, and sustainability addressed in a systemic fashion.