Barriers of Medication Administration Error Reporting in Neonatal and Neonatal Intensive Care Units

M. Nourian, M. Babaie, Fatemeh Heidary, M. Nasiri
{"title":"Barriers of Medication Administration Error Reporting in Neonatal and Neonatal Intensive Care Units","authors":"M. Nourian, M. Babaie, Fatemeh Heidary, M. Nasiri","doi":"10.22038/PSJ.2020.49860.1279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Medication administration error is the most common type of error in the field of medicine which is a risk factor for neonatal safety. These errors should be reported in order to prevent or mitigate their occurrence. In this regard, the present study aimed to determine the barriers of reporting medication administration errors from the point of view of nurses in neonatal and neonatal intensive care units. Materials and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was performed on 157 nurses who were selected using the census sampling method. The participants were nurses of neonatal and neonatal intensive care units in the hospitals affiliated to Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran, Iran. Moreover, the required data were collected using the second part of the Medication Administration Error Reporting Survey whose psychometric properties (content validity, face validity, construct validity, and reliability) were determined beforehand. Results: Results of factor analysis indicated the fitness of the data of the Persian version of the scale with 16 items and four factors. Based on the findings, from the point of view of nurses, “fear” and “administrative response” were the most important barriers to reporting errors, in that order. The most and least common fears of nurses were the fear of negative perceptions and complaints of the family of patients (4.95±1.28) and the fear of reprimand by physicians (3.22±1.43), respectively. Moreover, the most important barrier in reporting the errors concerning the administrative response was the lack of positive feedback regarding the correct medication administration (4.22±1.62). Conclusion: According to the results, it can be concluded that from the viewpoint of nurses, fear and administrative response are barriers to reporting medication administration errors.","PeriodicalId":16681,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and quality improvement","volume":"21 1","pages":"173-181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and quality improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/PSJ.2020.49860.1279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction: Medication administration error is the most common type of error in the field of medicine which is a risk factor for neonatal safety. These errors should be reported in order to prevent or mitigate their occurrence. In this regard, the present study aimed to determine the barriers of reporting medication administration errors from the point of view of nurses in neonatal and neonatal intensive care units. Materials and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was performed on 157 nurses who were selected using the census sampling method. The participants were nurses of neonatal and neonatal intensive care units in the hospitals affiliated to Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran, Iran. Moreover, the required data were collected using the second part of the Medication Administration Error Reporting Survey whose psychometric properties (content validity, face validity, construct validity, and reliability) were determined beforehand. Results: Results of factor analysis indicated the fitness of the data of the Persian version of the scale with 16 items and four factors. Based on the findings, from the point of view of nurses, “fear” and “administrative response” were the most important barriers to reporting errors, in that order. The most and least common fears of nurses were the fear of negative perceptions and complaints of the family of patients (4.95±1.28) and the fear of reprimand by physicians (3.22±1.43), respectively. Moreover, the most important barrier in reporting the errors concerning the administrative response was the lack of positive feedback regarding the correct medication administration (4.22±1.62). Conclusion: According to the results, it can be concluded that from the viewpoint of nurses, fear and administrative response are barriers to reporting medication administration errors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿和新生儿重症监护病房药物管理错误报告的障碍
导读:给药错误是医学领域最常见的错误类型,是新生儿安全的危险因素。应该报告这些错误,以防止或减轻它们的发生。在这方面,本研究旨在从新生儿和新生儿重症监护病房护士的角度确定报告给药错误的障碍。材料与方法:采用人口普查抽样方法对157名护士进行描述性横断面研究。参与者是伊朗德黑兰Shahid Beheshti医科大学附属医院新生儿和新生儿重症监护室的护士。此外,所需要的数据是通过药物管理错误报告调查的第二部分收集的,该调查的心理测量属性(内容效度、面孔效度、结构效度和信度)是预先确定的。结果:因子分析结果表明,波斯语版量表的16个条目和4个因子的数据符合要求。根据调查结果,从护士的角度来看,“恐惧”和“行政反应”是报告错误的最重要障碍,按此顺序排列。护士最害怕的是患者家属的负面看法和抱怨(4.95±1.28),最不害怕的是医生的训斥(3.22±1.43)。此外,报告管理反应错误的最重要障碍是缺乏对正确给药的积极反馈(4.22±1.62)。结论:从护士的角度来看,恐惧和行政反应是报告给药错误的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnosis of Lophomonas blattarum in bronchoalveolar lavage samples comparison of Social adjustment, school satisfaction and mental health in girls with and without precocious puberty A Critical Analysis Study of Pharmacological and Clinical Information Provided in Drug Package Inserts Based on Drugs and Cosmetics Rules Guidelines Evaluation of the Frequency of Stimulant and Opioid Abuse in the Poisoned Cases Referred To Hospitals in Ardabil, Iran Comparing Symptoms of Anxiety Disorders and Related Transdiagnostic Factors in Cancer Patients and Healthy Individuals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1