"By communynge is the beste assay": Gossip and the Speech of Reason in Hoccleve's Series

Q4 Arts and Humanities Scripta Mediaevalia Pub Date : 2019-06-11 DOI:10.1353/MDI.2019.0007
Daniel Bradley
{"title":"\"By communynge is the beste assay\": Gossip and the Speech of Reason in Hoccleve's Series","authors":"Daniel Bradley","doi":"10.1353/MDI.2019.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Thomas Hoccleve—if one believes his autobiographical poetry—was a bureaucrat who met trouble at every turn. At the heart of his frustrations was language, namely his own supposedly mad ramblings and the cruel gossip of former colleagues who refused to believe he had recovered from a previous period of mental illness. This paper argues that Hoccleve undoes malicious gossip by countering it with good gossip about himself, which he encourages readers to spread by using a rhetorical strategy that deploys both reported and direct speech. By highlighting Hoccleve's victimization, the autobiographical poems effect a poetic authorization that ensures his name is on everyone's tongue. Hoccleve reclaims his own trustworthiness in \"Dialogue with a Friend,\" not by convincing the friend of his reasoning, as many critics argue, but instead by undermining the rationality of this friend, who—alongside all other malicious gossips—is shown to be illogical. Such judges do not offer Hoccleve a fair \"assay,\" but instead judge based on assumption and faulty logic. Through the theme of madness, Hoccleve comments on the fragility of reputation and of a poet-administrator's solvency in a late-medieval world in which administrators, as professional communicators, are stronger as a group united, not divided, by talk.","PeriodicalId":36685,"journal":{"name":"Scripta Mediaevalia","volume":"45 1","pages":"187 - 217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scripta Mediaevalia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/MDI.2019.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Thomas Hoccleve—if one believes his autobiographical poetry—was a bureaucrat who met trouble at every turn. At the heart of his frustrations was language, namely his own supposedly mad ramblings and the cruel gossip of former colleagues who refused to believe he had recovered from a previous period of mental illness. This paper argues that Hoccleve undoes malicious gossip by countering it with good gossip about himself, which he encourages readers to spread by using a rhetorical strategy that deploys both reported and direct speech. By highlighting Hoccleve's victimization, the autobiographical poems effect a poetic authorization that ensures his name is on everyone's tongue. Hoccleve reclaims his own trustworthiness in "Dialogue with a Friend," not by convincing the friend of his reasoning, as many critics argue, but instead by undermining the rationality of this friend, who—alongside all other malicious gossips—is shown to be illogical. Such judges do not offer Hoccleve a fair "assay," but instead judge based on assumption and faulty logic. Through the theme of madness, Hoccleve comments on the fragility of reputation and of a poet-administrator's solvency in a late-medieval world in which administrators, as professional communicators, are stronger as a group united, not divided, by talk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“通过交流是最好的分析”:《八卦与理性的演讲》,出自霍克克利夫丛书
摘要:托马斯·霍克莱夫——如果你相信他的自传体诗歌的话——是一个处处遇到麻烦的官僚。他沮丧的核心是语言,也就是他自己被认为是疯狂的胡言乱语,以及那些拒绝相信他已经从之前的一段精神疾病中康复的前同事们残酷的八卦。本文认为,Hoccleve通过用关于他自己的好八卦来反击恶意八卦,他鼓励读者通过使用一种修辞策略来传播这些八卦,这种策略同时运用了间接引语和间接引语。通过强调霍克列夫的受害经历,自传体诗歌产生了一种诗意的授权,确保他的名字在每个人的舌头上。在《与朋友的对话》一书中,霍克列夫重新找回了自己的可信度,不是像许多评论家所说的那样,通过说服朋友相信他的推理,而是通过削弱这位朋友的理性,他和所有其他恶意的八卦一起,被证明是不合逻辑的。这样的法官并没有给霍克列夫一个公平的“分析”,而是基于假设和错误的逻辑做出判断。通过疯狂的主题,Hoccleve评论了在中世纪晚期的世界里,声誉的脆弱性和诗人管理者的偿付能力,在这个世界里,管理者作为专业的传播者,作为一个通过谈话团结而不是分裂的群体而更加强大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scripta Mediaevalia
Scripta Mediaevalia Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Medieval Unfreedoms in a Global Context The Elbian Region as Predatory Landscape, 900–1200 CE: Enslavement, Slaughter, and Settler Colonialism Were Concubines "Anti-Wives"? Revisiting the Biographical Narratives of Maria the Copt in Kitāb al-Ṭabaqāt al-Kubra and ʻInān in Kitāb al-Aghānī al-Kabīr Servile Concubinage in Eleventh- and Twelfth-Century Bavaria Performative Subjugation and the Invention of Race: The Danzas de Judios y Moros, Festivals, and Ceremonies in Late Medieval Iberia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1