Use of different spray volumes and hydraulic nozzles in air-assisted electrostatic insecticide application technologies to control coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) populations
R. Zampiróli, Matheus Vilhena Parenti, C. B. Alvarenga, F. J. Celoto, J. P. Cunha, P. C. Rinaldi
{"title":"Use of different spray volumes and hydraulic nozzles in air-assisted electrostatic insecticide application technologies to control coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) populations","authors":"R. Zampiróli, Matheus Vilhena Parenti, C. B. Alvarenga, F. J. Celoto, J. P. Cunha, P. C. Rinaldi","doi":"10.4025/actasciagron.v44i1.53751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chemical control is essential for efficient pest management in coffee crops. Application technologies should safely deliver insecticides to the target whilst protecting the environment, insecticide applicators, and consumers. To achieve these goals, application volumes, hydraulic nozzles, and application techniques should be evaluated. This study assessed the biological efficiency of different spray volumes and spray nozzles used to apply insecticides to control coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) populations. We applied insecticides using a hydropneumatic sprayer with and without an electrostatic spraying system. The experiment followed a randomized block factorial design (2 × 2 + 1) and included two types of spray nozzles [a hollow cone spray nozzle (JA1) and a hollow cone spray nozzle with air induction (TVI)], two spray volumes (200 and 400 L ha-1), one additional treatment (SPE2 nozzle with a 200 system 200 L ha-1), and six replicates. We assessed the control efficiency of the different application methods by evaluating the percentage of fruits damaged 20 and 40 days after the date of application. The spray volume did not affect the biological efficiency of pest control, and the lower spray volume (200 L ha-1) was effective in the control of coffee berry borers. Application of insecticides using coarse droplets was more efficient than the application using very fine and fine droplets. The TVI hydraulic spray nozzle effectively controlled coffee berry borers at 200 and 400 L ha-1. The electrostatic application system performed similarly to the conventional system in terms of the control of the coffee berry borers, and was less efficient than the conventional system under some operational conditions.","PeriodicalId":56373,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy.","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy.","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v44i1.53751","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Chemical control is essential for efficient pest management in coffee crops. Application technologies should safely deliver insecticides to the target whilst protecting the environment, insecticide applicators, and consumers. To achieve these goals, application volumes, hydraulic nozzles, and application techniques should be evaluated. This study assessed the biological efficiency of different spray volumes and spray nozzles used to apply insecticides to control coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) populations. We applied insecticides using a hydropneumatic sprayer with and without an electrostatic spraying system. The experiment followed a randomized block factorial design (2 × 2 + 1) and included two types of spray nozzles [a hollow cone spray nozzle (JA1) and a hollow cone spray nozzle with air induction (TVI)], two spray volumes (200 and 400 L ha-1), one additional treatment (SPE2 nozzle with a 200 system 200 L ha-1), and six replicates. We assessed the control efficiency of the different application methods by evaluating the percentage of fruits damaged 20 and 40 days after the date of application. The spray volume did not affect the biological efficiency of pest control, and the lower spray volume (200 L ha-1) was effective in the control of coffee berry borers. Application of insecticides using coarse droplets was more efficient than the application using very fine and fine droplets. The TVI hydraulic spray nozzle effectively controlled coffee berry borers at 200 and 400 L ha-1. The electrostatic application system performed similarly to the conventional system in terms of the control of the coffee berry borers, and was less efficient than the conventional system under some operational conditions.
化学防治对咖啡作物害虫的有效治理至关重要。应用技术应在保护环境、杀虫剂施用者和消费者的同时,安全地将杀虫剂输送到目标。为了实现这些目标,应该对应用量、液压喷嘴和应用技术进行评估。研究了不同喷雾量和不同喷嘴对咖啡果螟种群的生物防治效果。我们使用带和不带静电喷雾系统的液压气动喷雾器施用杀虫剂。试验采用随机区因子设计(2 × 2 + 1),包括两种类型的喷嘴[空心锥喷嘴(JA1)和空心锥带空气诱导喷嘴(TVI)],两种喷雾量(200和400 L ha-1),一个附加处理(SPE2喷嘴与200系统200 L ha-1), 6个重复。通过对施药后20d和40d的果损率评价不同施药方式的防治效果。喷施量不影响生物防治效果,较低喷施量(200 L ha-1)对咖啡果螟虫的防治效果较好。粗滴施用比细滴施用效果好。TVI液压喷雾器在200和400 L ha-1下对咖啡浆果蛀虫有较好的控制效果。静电应用系统在控制咖啡浆果蛀虫方面的表现与常规系统相似,但在某些操作条件下不如常规系统有效。
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes original articles in all areas of Agronomy, including soil sciences, agricultural entomology, soil fertility and manuring, soil physics, physiology of cultivated plants, phytopathology, phyto-health, phytotechny, genesis, morphology and soil classification, management and conservation of soil, integrated management of plant pests, vegetal improvement, agricultural microbiology, agricultural parasitology, production and processing of seeds.