Bibliometric analysis of venture teams of technology-based firms

Ana Lucia Alzate Alvarado, Gabriela Ribes Giner, Ismael Moya Clemente
{"title":"Bibliometric analysis of venture teams of technology-based firms","authors":"Ana Lucia Alzate Alvarado, Gabriela Ribes Giner, Ismael Moya Clemente","doi":"10.4995/bmt2021.2021.13695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to its growing impact on the economic development of countries, research on venture teams in new technology-based firms - TBFs has been increasing in recent years, seeking to identify the success and failure factors of this type of firms, given their high mortality rates. This paper analyzes the changes that have occurred in the intellectual structure of this discipline through the bibliometric analysis of research on the theme of venture teams in the new TBFs. The information collected was extracted from the main collection of the Web of Science (WoS) and SCOPUS databases from 1987 to 2020. The Nvivo and VOSviewer softwares are used to perform the initial analyzesas well as the analysis of citations, co-citations , co-authorship, etc. The advances associated with the main authors, sources and countries, the general citation structure and the development of this field are presented. The results show a growing publication trend as of 2009, seeing a higher production of articles between 2014 and 2019. USA is the most influential country, followed by UK and Italy. The\"Journal of Business Venturing\" and \"Technovation\" are the most influential sources. The main contribution of this work is to show the evolution of this theme, so that researchers can use it in the future in their theoretical and research frameworks","PeriodicalId":20438,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 3rd International Conference. Business Meets Technology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 3rd International Conference. Business Meets Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/bmt2021.2021.13695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to its growing impact on the economic development of countries, research on venture teams in new technology-based firms - TBFs has been increasing in recent years, seeking to identify the success and failure factors of this type of firms, given their high mortality rates. This paper analyzes the changes that have occurred in the intellectual structure of this discipline through the bibliometric analysis of research on the theme of venture teams in the new TBFs. The information collected was extracted from the main collection of the Web of Science (WoS) and SCOPUS databases from 1987 to 2020. The Nvivo and VOSviewer softwares are used to perform the initial analyzesas well as the analysis of citations, co-citations , co-authorship, etc. The advances associated with the main authors, sources and countries, the general citation structure and the development of this field are presented. The results show a growing publication trend as of 2009, seeing a higher production of articles between 2014 and 2019. USA is the most influential country, followed by UK and Italy. The"Journal of Business Venturing" and "Technovation" are the most influential sources. The main contribution of this work is to show the evolution of this theme, so that researchers can use it in the future in their theoretical and research frameworks
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技术型企业风险团队的文献计量分析
由于风险团队对各国经济发展的影响越来越大,近年来,对基于新技术的公司(tbf)的风险团队的研究一直在增加,试图确定这类公司的成功和失败因素,因为它们的死亡率很高。本文通过文献计量学方法对新ttbfs中创业团队主题的研究进行分析,分析了该学科的知识结构发生的变化。所收集的信息摘自Web of Science (WoS)和SCOPUS数据库1987 - 2020年的主要数据集。使用Nvivo和VOSviewer软件进行初步分析,以及对引文、共被引、合著等进行分析。介绍了文献的主要作者、来源和国家、引文结构和研究进展。结果显示,自2009年以来,文章发表的趋势不断增长,2014年至2019年的文章产量更高。美国是最有影响力的国家,其次是英国和意大利。《商业风险投资杂志》和《科技创新》是最有影响力的来源。这项工作的主要贡献是展示了这一主题的演变,以便研究人员可以在未来的理论和研究框架中使用它
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring SMEs crowdfunding solutions that can generate trust Qualitative-Comparative Analysis case study: Integration of water into the business strategy Methodology in 3D laser scanning of a farmhouse The International Wind Band Contest «City of Valencia» as historical and cultural heritage: analysis of the innovative performed repertoire from the tuba chair Evolutionary Process of the “Born Globals” – A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1